As confidentially submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2018

This draft registration statement has not been publicly filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and all information herein remains strictly confidential.

 

Registration Statement No. 333-

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

Confidential Draft Submission #2 

  FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

SUMMIT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware   5065   27-3107828

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

Summit Semiconductor, Inc.
6840 Via Del Oro Ste. 280

San Jose, CA 95119

(408)-627-4716

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

Brett Moyer

Chief Executive Officer

Summit Semiconductor, Inc.
6840 Via Del Oro Ste. 280

San Jose, CA 95119

(408)-627-4716

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies to:

 

David E. Danovitch

Stephanie L. Salvatore

Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene
Genovese and Gluck, P.C.

875 3rd Avenue

New York, New York 10022

(212) 603-6391

Brett Moyer
Chief Executive Officer

Summit Semiconductor, Inc.
6840 Via Del Oro Ste. 280

San Jose, CA 95119

 (408)-627-4716

Peter DiChiara
Carmel, Milazzo & DiChiara
261 Madison Avenue
New York, New York
212 - 658 - 0458

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box. ☐

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging Growth Company ☒

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Securities Being Registered Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)(2) Amount of Registration Fee
Common Stock(3) [●] [●]
Representatives’ Warrant to purchase common stock(4)
Common Stock, underlying Representatives’ Warrants(3), (5) [●] [●]
(1) In accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the number of shares being registered and the proposed maximum offering price per share are not included in this table.

(2) Estimated solely for purposes of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act. Includes the offering price of shares of common stock that the underwriter has the option to purchase to cover over-allotments, if any.

(3) Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act, the shares registered hereby also include an indeterminate number of additional shares as may from time to time become issuable by reason of stock splits, distributions, recapitalizations or other similar transactions.

(4)No registration fee is required pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act.

(5) Estimated solely for the purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act. The warrants are exercisable at a per share exercise price equal to 120% of the public offering price. The proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the underwriter’s warrants is $               , which is equal to 120% of $          (   % of $               ).

 

The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment that specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

 

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement related to these securities filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy these securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted. 

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED FEBRUARY 5, 2018

  

Summit Semiconductor 

Common Stock

  

We are offering            shares of common stock on a best efforts basis. This is our initial public offering and no public market currently exists for our common stock. The initial public offering price of our common stock is expected to be between $          and $          per share. We plan to apply to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “WISA.”

 

We are an “emerging growth company” as the term is used in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 and, as such, have elected to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements for this prospectus and future filings. See “Prospectus Summary—Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company.”

 

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 10 of this prospectus for a discussion of the risks that you should consider in connection with an investment in our securities.  

 

    Per Share     Total  
Initial public offering price   $     $  
Underwriting discounts and commissions (1)   $     $  

 

(1) See “Underwriting” beginning on page 69 for additional information regarding underwriting compensation.

 

The underwriter expects to deliver the common stock to the purchasers on or about                  , 2018.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

Alexander Capital, L.P.

 

The date of this prospectus is          , 2018.

  

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  Page
Prospectus Summary 1
Risk Factors 10
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 24
Industry and Market Data 25
Use of Proceeds 26
Dividend Policy 26
Capitalization 27
Dilution 28
Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data 30
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 31
Business 37
Management 46
Executive Compensation 52
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions 54
Principal Stockholders 59
Description of Capital Stock 61
Shares Eligible for Future Sale 64
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations 65
Underwriting 69
Legal Matters 75
Experts 75
Where You Can Find Additional Information 75
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements F-1

 

You should rely only on the information contained in this document and any free writing prospectus we provide to you. We and the underwriter have not authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses we have prepared. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the common stock offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.

 

For investors outside the United States: We and the underwriter have not done anything that would permit this offering, or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.

 

 I

 

  

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. Before investing in shares of our common stock, you should carefully read this entire prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the information set forth under the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in each case included in this prospectus. Unless the context otherwise requires, we use the terms “Summit,” “SS,” “Company,” “our,” “us,” and “we” in this prospectus to refer to, prior to the corporate conversion discussed below, Summit Semiconductor, LLC, and after the corporate conversion, to Summit Semiconductor, Inc. and, where appropriate, in each case our consolidated subsidiaries.

 

Summit Semiconductor, Inc.

 

Overview

 

We believe that the future of audio technology is in wireless devices and that Summit is well positioned to deliver best in class wireless audio technologies to mainstream consumers and audio enthusiasts. According to a June 2017 report by Markets and MarketsTM research firm that can be found at www.marketsandmarkets.com, the wireless audio market is projected to be $31.80 billion by 2023, making it one of the fastest growing consumer segments. The information contained in or accessible through the foregoing website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and is for informational purposes only. We currently sell modules which wirelessly transmit and receive audio directly to speakers, and which are also fully certified and compatible with the Wireless Speaker and Audio (WiSA) Association’s current Compliance Test Specification (CTS), which tests the interoperability and quality of products that offer wireless, interference free, uncompressed High-Definition audio. Additionally, we plan to license our proprietary software technology, currently imbedded in our wireless modules, to other companies who can then embed our technology into other Wi-Fi enabled smart devices. The segment of the wireless audio market that Summit focuses on is comprised of scalable multichannel solutions with levels of latency that are low enough to synchronize with video. The term multichannel refers to the use of multiple audio tracks to reconstruct sound on a multi-speaker sound system.

 

As part of the effort to grow the wireless multichannel home audio segment, Summit was a founding member of the Wireless Speaker and Audio Association (WiSA), an association dedicated to providing industry leadership and consumer choice through interoperability testing between brands. There are currently over 40 brands participating in WiSA. Products certified and marked with a WiSA logo have been tested to interoperate. This preserves consumer choice by enabling consumers to choose different wireless transmitting products across different brands where audio is decoded with speakers that have the WiSA logo displayed. Our marketing strategy focuses on, what we believe, are two emerging wireless audio market needs: better audio quality and lower signal latency. Summit currently sells custom semiconductor chips and wireless modules to a growing list of consumer electronics customers including major brands such as Axiim, Bang & Olufsen, Enclave Audio, Klipsch, LG and Onkyo/Pioneer. We believe that a growing adoption of our technology by leaders in consumer electronics will revolutionize the way people experience media content through their mobile devices, TVs, game consoles and PCs.

  

Our Business Focus

 

Our primary business focus is to enable mainstream consumers and audio enthusiasts to experience high quality audio. We intend to continue selling our semiconductors and wireless modules to consumer electronics companies while also increasing our focus on implementing a software licensing business segment.

 

Industry Background

 

The wireless audio market is expected to grow from $16.13 billion in 2016 to $31.80 billion by 2023 according to a June 2017 report by Markets and MarketsTM research firm. The primary growth segments for in home entertainment have been “Bluetooth” stereo accessories which include single speakers, headsets, and more recently, “multi-room” stereo speakers that use your home’s Wi-Fi network to stream audio throughout the house. According to a September 2017 article available at www.dealerscope.com the recent emergence of the latter component audio system has presented issues in latency and quality among wireless devices, which Summit’s technology aims to fix. The information contained in or accessible through the foregoing website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and is for informational purposes only.

 

1 

 

 

Our Technology

 

Our technology addresses some of the main issues that we perceive are hindering the growth of the home theater: complexity and cost. We believe consumers want to experience theater quality surround sound from the comfort of their homes. However, wired home theater systems often require expensive audio-visual (AV) receivers to decode the audio stream, leaving the consumer with the burden of concealing the wires. Hiring a professional to hide the wires into the walls or floor is invasive, complicated, costly and time consuming. Further, people that rent as opposed to own may not be able to install these systems as the installation construction needed may not be permitted under a lease agreement. Our first-generation wireless technology addresses these problems by transmitting wireless audio to each speaker at Blu-ray quality (uncompressed 24bit audio up to 96k sample rates) and emphasizing ease of setup. To our knowledge, Summit’s custom chip and module technology is one of the only technologies available today that can stream up to eight separate wireless audio channels with low latency, removing lip-sync issues between the audio and video sources. In addition, every speaker within a system that utilizes our technology can be synchronized to less than one micro second, thus eliminating phase distortion between speakers. Summit’s first-generation technology shows that wireless home theater systems are viable home audio solutions for the average consumer and audio enthusiast alike.

 

Summit is currently developing certain proprietary software for which patent applications have been submitted (“Summit second generation technology”) that we believe will provide similar functionality and quality and allow us to enable smart devices, that have Wi-Fi and video media, to deliver surround sound audio. A prototype version of our software technology has been demonstrated to select customers (pursuant to confidentiality agreements) at the recent 2018 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, NV. We plan to use approximately $3 million from this offering to productize our intellectual property through continued invention and robust testing. We believe our software based-solution, which other brands can integrate into their devices, will (i) reduce integration costs for mass market use, (ii) utilize Wi-Fi for wireless connectivity, making the need for complex physical wire installations unnecessary, (iii) provide a low power consumption option to allow for use in battery powered devices, and (iv) provide compatibility with popular consumer electronic operating systems.

 

Additionally, we believe our software based solution will have certain advantages compared to our custom chip and modules we currently have available since our current chips and modules require brands to integrate a separate dedicated Summit transmit module even if a Wi-Fi module is included in the design of the device. Our custom chip and module solution may not be appropriate for integrating into certain devices because it adds to system cost, power consumption, and occupies space. We intend to leverage what we’ve learned from our current products to help us develop a product that can be easily ported to run as software on most any Wi-Fi module and media system on a chip (SOC) combination as opposed to a proprietary wireless audio module. This new approach eliminates the cost of a second radio so there is no additional material cost, assuming there is a Wi-Fi module already integrated into the device.

 

WiSA Association

 

Our wholly owned subsidiary, WiSA, LLC is an association comprised of brands, manufacturers, and influencers within the consumer electronics industry, whom agree that a standardized method of interoperability between wireless audio components should exist and most of whom believe that products should be brought to market with this goal in mind. WiSA creates, maintains and manages specifications for wireless interoperability that are available to all association members. For products with a WiSA Certification, WiSA also creates, maintains and manages testing criteria and specifications for all products to be listed, marketed and sold. WiSA Certification is an industrywide “stamp of approval” certifying that a product is interoperable with other WiSA Certified products and has passed several high-performance tests ensuring low levels of latency and tight channel synchronization. As owners of WiSA, LLC, we certify all WiSA products. We do not actually sell any WiSA-certified products, however, we do distribute the technology to enable products to meet the WiSA certification test specifications.

 

Currently, WiSA Certified products are required to use Summit modules in order to meet the standards set by the association. As a result, WiSA members purchase modules from us in order to build their products.

 

Among WiSA certified products, consumers will be able to outfit their home entertainment system with WiSA certified speakers and components from any participating vendor with the assurance that the devices will interoperate and provide high quality wireless High Definition surround sound.

 

The Association manages logo usage and trademark guidelines, investigates alternative markets, connects brands to manufacturing resources, and provides industry leadership in solving the challenges facing the home theater and commercial markets in the integration of wireless audio technology.

 

2 

 

 

Modules

 

Summit has designed wireless modules that provide high performance wireless audio for our customers to build into their products like a speaker, TV, or dongle for example. These modules include our custom semiconductors with our intellectual property (IP) built in as well as a Wi-Fi radio for communications. By designing and selling these modules we can reduce our customers design expense, accelerate their time-to-market cycle, and reduce the cost of each module. Summit offers both a “TX” module to transmit the audio from a host device like a media hub, TV or dongle to WiSA enabled speakers and an “RX” model for speakers, that receives the wireless audio signal and processes it for audio play out.

 

Modules for Consumer Products

 

Summit’s TX modules are targeted for integration into TVs, AV receivers, media hubs, and small dongles that connect through USB or HDMI ports of these devices. Summit’s transmitter, with its integrated antenna, is designed to support rooms as large as ten meters by ten meters with uncompressed, 24 bit 96 kHz audio. The module supports a simple interface, with Inter-IC Sound (I2S) or USB audio and control.

 

Summit’s receiver interfaces to a digital amplifier and is designed to be integrated directly into a home theater speaker. Integrated antennas support 24 bit, 96 kHz audio anywhere within a 10 meters by 10 meters space. It supports one or two separate audio outputs via I2S. An optional interface on the receiver module can be enabled to configure the speaker type and provide volume/mute control at the speaker. Alternatively, the speaker type can be assigned at the factory for preconfigured Home Theater in a Box (HTiB) applications.

 

Summit Speaker Systems

 

There are speaker systems utilizing Summit’s technology currently in the market with a price range of $1,000 to over $80,000. We believe the technology allows brands and retailers to provide high quality systems to consumers at a multitude of price points. Further, multi-channel systems can be easily expanded, allowing a consumer to start with a basic 2.0 (stereo) or sound-bar system and expand over time.

 

The Summit Opportunity

 

We believe the following attributes: cost, mobility, video support, easy installation and quality create a market opportunity for Summit technologies to be adopted by the consumer electronics industry as described further below.

 

Cost

 

We believe the simplicity and cost structure of our upcoming embedded software solution will make our prices competitive for a wider range of applications, allowing consumer electronics companies to integrate our technology, while also delivering high quality audio.

 

Mobility

 

Mobile devices are popular for streaming video, gaming and using Virtual Reality (VR) applications. We believe this is driving a need for an embedded high fidelity wireless solution in the mobile device that can transmit audio to headsets or speakers within a room. Summit’s technology enables high quality wireless audio transmission from mobile devices.

 

Video Support

 

Wireless audio capable of supporting video has become a priority for consumers across a variety of high volume multimedia platforms, including TV’s, smartphones, game consoles and set-top boxes. Video applications require audio and video to be perfectly synchronized in order to avoid lip-sync and audio phase distortion issues. Summit’s technology prioritizes low latency and synchronization to less than one micro second, thus practically eliminating phase distortion between speakers.

 

3 

 

 

Ease of Installation

 

We believe the home theater market has moved toward simplicity in recent years. The costly and inconvenient home theaters of the past have left consumers with a desire for audio systems that provide a simplified installation process. We believe that new audio systems, including the predominant sound bar system, are unable to provide high levels of performance especially in the surround-sound market. Summit’s technology greatly simplifies the installation process of true surround-sound systems. This allows consumers to install a home theater system with the same amount of effort as a sound bar but enjoy a far superior experience. An overwhelming majority of the content entering our homes through digital TV and streaming services is provided in a multi-channel format, which is why Summit’s goal is to facilitate enjoyment of true surround sound for both the everyday consumer and audio enthusiast.

 

In addition to easy installation, Summit modules provide consumers with a multitude of options, allowing customization of a home theater specific to each consumer, without being forced to stick with one brand of speaker. For example, our hope is that a consumer might start with a Summit enabled sound bar for their television and then add a Summit enabled subwoofer. That same system can be easily upgraded to a variety of surround sound systems by simply adding more speakers. Our technology will allow consumers to upgrade an audio system or just one component of the system without the need to replace the entire system, consumers can keep the original transmitter, sound bar, and subwoofer and integrate them seamlessly into a new system. Being able to outfit a home entertainment system with Summit-enabled speakers and components gives consumers the ability to express their individual preference and needs and provides the assurance that the devices will interoperate, delivering the highest standard in HD wireless surround sound.

 

Dissatisfaction with Bluetooth Performance and Quality

 

We believe consumers want better performance and quality from their Bluetooth audio devices. For example, they may want headsets that stay connected over longer distances or products that offer better audio fidelity. By offering a solution that addresses these needs at a comparable price point to Bluetooth, we believe we can build consumer demand for our technology.

 

Profitability of Audio Component Accessories

 

HDTVs are getting thinner and it is becoming increasingly difficult to incorporate the latest electronic advances into such thin displays. We expect that eventually most of the electronics will be external to the display. We believe the first physical feature to go will be the audio component, since there is very little room for quality speakers in today’s thin displays. We believe HDTV manufacturers know they need to provide an audio alternative. Additionally, since cost is a significant consideration, we believe some manufacturers may offer external sound bars which will satisfy some consumers, but perhaps not the consumers who desire a high-quality audio alternative. We believe these developments are creating an inflection point in the market, and manufacturers are looking to Summit’s technology to create a standard for wireless audio interoperability that will support a long-term product strategy for the successful development of high quality, wireless audio products. By designing speaker systems that incorporate Summit’s technology, consumer electronics companies will be able to sell easy-to-install surround sound audio solutions alongside televisions.

 

Consumers want to enjoy improved audio on existing content

 

We believe the growth in the number of video devices streaming multi-channel audio content coupled with new 3D immersive sound experiences from Dolby ATMOS and DTSx will help propel the demand for wireless speakers well into the future.

 

Consumers want to be able to enjoy wireless audio without interference from other wireless signals

 

Having other devices nearby that also use the 5 GHz band should not affect the performance of a Summit enabled audio system, as Summit’s technology can seamlessly switch to another frequency within the 5 GHz band. The 5 GHz U-NII spectrum utilized by Summit technology has up to 24 channels available that are constantly monitored for interference using the Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) sub-band between 5.2 and 5.8 GHz. When interference is detected, the next channel, having been monitored for over one minute and confirmed for accessibility, is ready to go and Summit enabled devices switch seamlessly to that channel, without the user ever noticing or the audio experience being affected.

 

4 

 

 

What makes Summit unique

 

Both the proprietary technology and the adoption of the technology by leaders in consumer electronics are differentiating factors for Summit. Management believes that Summit is the only company with the technical capabilities of transmitting high resolution, low latency, and speaker synchronization of wireless audio capable of supporting up to 8 channels. Premium consumer brands, like Bang and Olufsen, have begun to adopt our technology as a valued feature in performance products.

 

Category defining wireless audio

 

Our wireless technology delivers 8 channels of uncompressed audio directly to the speakers in 24 bit and up to 96 kHz sample rates. This means that a consumer can experience audio exactly as it was mastered in the studio. Summit’s technology supports surround sound systems up to 7.1(Eight Channel Surround Audio System). Summit’s technology roadmap includes proprietary software, currently in development, that will support 802.11 Wi-Fi protocol while delivering lower cost performance to our first-generation solution. This proprietary software has been designed to scale in audio channel count and sample rates even as Wi-Fi performance or network utilization changes.

 

Summit Customers

 

Well-known consumer electronics brands realize the opportunity to create wireless audio products that are simple to install and perform at high levels. Brands such as Bang and Olufsen and Klipsch have chosen Summit technology to drive their wireless home audio/theater product assortments. We believe their leadership has brought credibility to the technology and paved the way at retail for other brands to follow.

 

Our Strategy

 

Our goal is to establish and maintain a leadership position as the ubiquitous standard for hi-fidelity wireless, multi-channel audio. To obtain and enhance our position as the leading standard in the audio space, we intend to:

 

improve recognition of our Summit brand and WiSA standard brand;

 

provide excellent products and services to our customers and members;

 

make sure our technology is accessible to many consumers by having our technology in consumer electronics devices that sell at a variety of price points;

 

expand market awareness of wireless multi-channel hi-fidelity audio experience availability;

 

reduce hardware costs while moving towards a software licensing business model;

 

enhance and protect our intellectual property portfolio;

 

invest in highly qualified personnel; and

 

build innovative products alongside the world’s leading consumer electronics companies.

 

We currently sell our modules to a customer base that is primarily comprised of companies that sell their electronics in relatively small quantities. As the larger consumer electronics companies whom we are working with begin to sell new Summit enabled products, we expect that orders for our modules will increase proportionally. With larger orders, we believe that we can take advantage of economies of scale and improve our gross margins on our modules.

 

5 

 

 

Interoperability

 

Interoperability is a key aspect of wireless technology. We believe this is especially true in audio, where unique designs, price points, audio quality and capabilities as well as consumer brand loyalties are significant factors for the end consumer. Creating home theater and audio components that all work with an interoperable standard creates a high level of confidence in retailers and consumers and helps drive the entire category. Interoperability also increases the opportunity for specialized brands to create new and innovative products knowing they can focus on their specific part of the market and rely on others to create the necessary cohort components.

 

Proprietary Software

 

A significant amount of our time and resources are being allocated towards launching a software licensing part of our business. Customers will receive a license for our TX software, so that any of their devices with a suitable Wi-Fi radio can transmit audio compliant with our standard without having to purchase and integrate our TX module. We believe that this software will be well positioned for use by major consumer electronics companies in many devices including televisions, handsets, gaming consoles, and computers. Patent applications have been submitted for key technology innovations in this software.

 

Speaker companies under this new model would purchase Wi-Fi modules with our RX software pre-installed from an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”), rather than buying modules directly from us. The OEM would pay a royalty to us based on how many modules with our software that it sold.

 

Risks Affecting Our Business

 

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this prospectus summary. These risks include, among others, the following:

 

Our success depends on maintaining and increasing our sales, which depends on factors we cannot control, including the viability and reputation of our customers and their products.

 

If we are unable to sell our modules into new markets or to new consumer electronics companies, our revenue may not grow.

 

If our business does not grow as we expect, or if we fail to manage our growth effectively, our operating results and business prospects would suffer.

 

Our business is dependent upon our ability to deploy and deliver our solutions, and the failure to meet our customers’ expectations could harm our reputation, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

We have not been profitable historically and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

 

We may require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, and our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

 

Corporate Information

 

We were formed as Summit Semiconductor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on July 23, 2010. We converted to a Delaware corporation, effective December 31, 2017, at which time we changed our name to Summit Semiconductor, Inc. We run our operations through Summit Semiconductor, Inc., as well as through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Summit Semiconductor K.K., a Japanese corporation and WiSA, LLC, a California limited liability company.

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 6840 Via Del Oro, Ste. 280, San Jose, CA 95119 and our telephone number is (408) 627-4716. Our website address is www.summitwireless.com. The website for WiSA is http://www.wisaassociation.org. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our websites is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and is intended for informational purposes only.

 

6 

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, Summit WirelessTM, the Summit Semiconductor logo and other trade names, trademarks or service marks of Summit Semiconductor appearing in this prospectus are the property of Summit Semiconductor, Inc. Trade names, trademarks and service marks of other companies appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective holders.

 

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

 

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). For as long as we are an emerging growth company, unlike public companies that are not emerging growth companies under the JOBS Act, we will not be required to:

 

provide an auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;

provide more than two years of audited financial statements and related management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations;

comply with any new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer;

provide certain disclosure regarding executive compensation required of larger public companies or hold shareholder advisory votes on the executive compensation required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”); or

obtain shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

 

We will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of the:

 

last day of the fiscal year in which we have $1.07 billion or more in annual revenues;

date on which we become a “large accelerated filer” (the fiscal year-end on which the total market value of our common equity securities held by non-affiliates is $700 million or more as of June 30);

date on which we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period; or

last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering.

 

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for complying with new or revised accounting standards, but we intend to irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period and, as a result, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates in which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies.

 

We have elected to adopt certain of the reduced disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies. As a result of these elections, the information that we provide in this prospectus may be different than the information you may receive from other public companies in which you hold equity interests. In addition, it is possible that some investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result of these elections, which may result in a less active trading market for our common stock and higher volatility in our stock price.

 

7 

 

  

The Offering

 

Shares of common stock offered by us              shares
     
Total shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering              shares
     
Use of proceeds   We estimate that we will receive net proceeds of approximately $          million, assuming an initial public offering price of $          per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The principal purposes of this offering are to increase our financial flexibility, create a public market for shares of our common stock, and facilitate our future access to the capital markets. We expect to use the net proceeds of this offering for product development, sales and marketing, working capital, debt servicing and other general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the proceeds from this offering for acquisitions or strategic investments in complementary businesses or technologies, although we do not currently have any plans for any such acquisitions or investments. These expectations are subject to change. See “Use of Proceeds” for additional information.
     
Risk factors   See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 10 and the other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common stock.
     
Proposed NASDAQ symbol   “WISA”

 

Shares of our common stock that will be outstanding after this offering is based on 7,826,527 shares outstanding as of January 30, 2018 and assumes both (i) the conversion of all outstanding convertible promissory notes and (ii) preferred stock to common stock but excludes all warrants outstanding or issuable in connection with this offering.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, this prospectus reflects and assumes the following:

 

  the conversion of both (i) all outstanding convertible promissory notes and (ii) preferred stock to common stock;

 

  no exercise of warrants outstanding or issuable in connection with this offering; and

 

  no exercise by the underwriter of their option to purchase any shares of common stock.

 

8 

 

   

Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Data

 

The following summary consolidated financial information should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes, as well as the information found under the sections titled “Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

We derived the summary consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the selected statements of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2017, and the selected balance sheet data as of September 30, 2017, from our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have prepared the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and have included, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair statement of the financial information set forth in those statements. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future.

 

    Year ended December 31,     Nine months ended September 30,  
    2015     2016     2016     2017  
Revenue, net   $ 2,111,995     $ 1,273,113     $ 990,915     $ 901,454  
Cost of revenue     2,206,751       1,533,790       1,222,092       1,028,871  
Gross profit     (94,756 )     (260,677 )     (231,177 )     (127,417 )
                                 
Operating Expenses:                                
Research and development     5,748,282       5,218,958       4,280,693       2,783,064  
Sales and marketing     2,168,383       2,049,265       1,582,628       1,251,887  
General and administrative     809,205       967,690       723,992       856,697  
Total operating expenses     8,725,870       8,235,913       6,587,313       4,891,648  
Loss from operations     (8,820,626 )     (8,496,590 )     (6,818,490 )     (5,019,065 )
Interest expense     (392,284 )     (1,863,746 )     (1,134,469 )     (7,654,750 )
Change in fair value of warrant liability           568,103       51,142       3,203,468  
Other income (expense), net     125,727       93,399       (5,061 )     (7,630 )
Loss before provision for income taxes     (9,087,183 )     (9,698,834 )     (7,906,878 )     (9,477,977 )
Provision for income taxes     9,922       9,435       3,622       2,950  
Net loss   $ (9,097,105 )   $ (9,708,269 )   $ (7,910,500 )   $ (9,480,927 )
Net loss per common unit - basic and diluted   $ (0.40 )   $ (0.49 )   $ (0.32 )   $ (1.85 )
Weighted average number of common units used in computing net loss per common unit     22,604,551       19,785,238       24,779,040       5,122,221  
Pro forma net loss per common share - basic and diluted (1)   $ (6.04 )   $ (7.36 )   $ (4.79 )   $ (27.76 )
Pro forma weighted average number of common shares used in computing pro forma net loss per common share (1)     1,506,970       1,319,016       1,651,936       341,481  
Pro forma as adjusted net loss per common share - basic and diluted (2)                           $ (3.05 )
Pro forma as adjusted weighted average number of common shares used in computing pro forma as adjusted net loss per common share (2)                             3,104,043  

 

 

(1) Pro forma shows the reclassification of preferred and common units to preferred and common stock in connection with the Company’s conversion from an LLC to a C Corporation.

(2) Pro forma as adjusted shows both the conversion of the Company from an LLC to a C Corporation as well as the conversion of all preferred stock to common stock in connection with the Company’s initial public offering.

 

9 

 

  

RISK FACTORS

 

Investing in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before deciding whether to purchase shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks is realized, our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

 

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

 

Loss of key customer.

 

A small number of our customers may represent a significant percentage of our revenue. Although we may have agreements with these customers, these agreements typically do not require any minimum purchases and do not prohibit customers from using competing technologies or customers from purchasing products and services from competitors. Because many of our markets are rapidly evolving, customer demand for our technologies and products can shift quickly. Our largest customer, Bang and Olufsen represented 50% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 while one other customer represented 31% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

 

10 

 

 

Reliance on semiconductor and module manufacturers.

 

Our revenue from the sale of modules to consumer electronics and speaker companies depends in large part upon the availability of our modules that implement our technologies. Our manufacturers incorporate our technologies into these modules, which are then incorporated in consumer entertainment products. We do not manufacture these modules, but rather depend on manufacturers to produce the modules which we then sell to our customers. We do not control the manufacturers. While we have a longstanding relationship with our manufacturer(s), there can be no assurance that our manufacturers will continue to timely produce our modules. Change in management of our manufacturer or a change in their operations could negatively affect our production and cause us to seek other manufacturers which we may not be able to obtain on the same or similar terms as our current manufacturers. This could have a negative effect on our operations.

 

Declines in or Problems with WiSA Association Membership could negatively affect our reputation.

 

We rely significantly on the members of our subsidiary, WiSA, LLC (the “Association”) to uphold the standards and criteria of interoperable audio products. If we lose members or new technology is developed that is easier to incorporate than ours, the Association may fail to maintain its active status and the sales of our modules could diminish as well. In addition, failure of our members to adhere to our policies designed to interoperability between audio systems could undermine the integrity of our brand.

 

Failure to stay on top of technology innovation could harm our business model.

 

Our revenue growth will depend upon our success in new and existing markets for our technologies. The markets for our technologies and products are defined by:

 

Rapid technological change;

 

New and improved technology and frequent product introductions;

 

Changing consumer demands;

 

Evolving industry standards; and

 

Technology and product obsolescence.

 

Our future success depends on our ability to enhance our technologies and products and to develop new technologies and products that address the market needs in a timely manner. Technology development is a complex, uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation, highly-skilled engineering and development personnel, and the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. We may not be able to identify, develop, acquire, market, or support new or enhanced technologies or products on a timely basis, if at all.

 

Economic uncertainties or downturns, or political changes, could limit the availability of funds available to our customers and potential customers, which could materially adversely affect our business.

 

Current or future economic uncertainties or downturns could adversely affect our business and operating results. Negative conditions in the general economy both in the United States and abroad, including conditions resulting from changes in gross domestic product growth, financial and credit market fluctuations, political deadlock, natural catastrophes, warfare and terrorist attacks on the United States, Europe, the Asia Pacific region or elsewhere, could cause a decrease in funds available to our customers and potential customers and negatively affect the rate of growth of our business.

 

General worldwide economic uncertainty and political changes in the United States and elsewhere could impact our business. Such conditions may make it extremely difficult for our customers and us to forecast and plan future budgetary decisions or business activities accurately, and they could cause our customers to reevaluate their decisions to purchase our solutions, which could delay and lengthen our sales cycles or result in cancellations of planned purchases. Furthermore, during challenging economic times or as a result of political changes, our customers may tighten their budgets and face constraints in gaining timely access to sufficient funding or other credit, which could result in an impairment of their ability to make timely payments to us. In turn, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, which would adversely affect our financial results.

 

11 

 

 

We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic slowdown, instability or recovery, generally or within any particular industry, or the impact of political changes. If the economic conditions of the general economy or industries in which we operate worsen from present levels, or if recent political changes result in less funding being available to purchase our solutions, our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.

 

Consumer spending weakness could impact our revenue.

 

Weakness in general economic conditions may suppress consumer demand in our markets. Many of the products in which our technologies are incorporated are discretionary goods, such as home-theater systems and speaker systems for commercial use. Weakness in general economic conditions may also lead to customers becoming delinquent on their obligations to us or being unable to pay, resulting in a higher level of write-offs. Economic conditions may impact the amount businesses spend on their speaker systems. Weakness in economic conditions could lessen demand for our products and negatively affect our revenue.

 

We have not been profitable historically and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

 

We have posted a net loss in each year since inception, including net losses of ($9,097,105) and ($9,708,269) in the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively, and a net loss of ($9,480,927) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. As of September 30, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of ($92,112,137). While we expect to experience stronger revenue growth in future periods, we are not certain whether or when we will obtain a high enough volume of sales of our solutions to sustain or increase our growth or achieve or maintain profitability in the future. We also expect our costs to increase in future periods, which could negatively affect our future operating results if our revenue does not increase. In particular, we expect to continue to expend substantial financial and other resources on:

 

  sales and marketing, including a significant expansion of our sales organization, both domestically and internationally;

 

  research and development related to our solutions, including investments in our engineering and technical teams;

 

  continued international expansion of our business; and

 

  general and administrative expenses, including legal and accounting expenses preparing for and related to being a public company.

 

These investments may not result in increased revenue or growth in our business. If we are unable to increase our revenue at a rate sufficient to offset the expected increase in our costs, our business, operating results and financial position may be harmed, and we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability over the long term. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen operating expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may result in losses in future periods. If our revenue growth does not meet our expectations in future periods, our financial performance may be harmed, and we may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

 

12 

 

 

We may require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, and our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

 

We intend to continue to make substantial investments to fund our business and support our growth. In addition, we may require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new features or enhance our solutions, improve our operating infrastructure or acquire or develop complementary businesses and technologies. As a result, in addition to the revenues we generate from our business and the proceeds from this offering, we may need to engage in additional equity or debt financings to provide the funds required for these and other business endeavors. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing that we may secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. We may not be able to obtain such additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be adversely affected. In addition, our inability to generate or obtain the financial resources needed may require us to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

 

We face intense competition in our industry, and we may not be able to compete successfully in our target markets.

 

The digital audio, consumer electronics and entertainment markets are characterized by intense competition, subject to rapid change, and are significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. Our competitors include many large domestic and international companies that have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution and other resources, greater name recognition, a longer operating history, broader product lines, lower cost structures and longer-standing relationships with customers and suppliers than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond better to new or emerging technologies or standards and to changes in customer requirements.

 

Further, some of our competitors are in a better financial and marketing position from which to influence industry acceptance of a particular product standard or a competing technology than we are. Our competitors may also be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of products, and may be in a position to deliver competitive products at a lower price than we can, along with the potential to conduct strategic acquisitions, joint ventures, subsidies and lobbying industry and government standards, hire more experienced technicians, engineers and research and development teams than we can. As a result, we may not be able to compete effectively against any of these organizations.

 

Our ability to compete in our current target markets and future markets will depend in large part on our ability to successfully develop, introduce and sell new and enhanced products or technologies on a timely and cost-effective basis and to respond to changing market requirements. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and potentially reduce their prices. In addition, our competitors may develop future generations and enhancements of competitive products or new or enhanced technologies that may offer greater performance and improved pricing or render our technologies obsolete. If we are unable to match or exceed the improvements made by our competitors, our market position and prospects could deteriorate and our net product sales could decline.

 

13 

 

 

Failure to effectively develop and expand our sales and marketing capabilities could harm our ability to increase our customer base and achieve broader market acceptance of our modules.

 

To increase total customers and customer recognition of WiSA Association products and to achieve broader market acceptance of our technology, we will need to expand our sales and marketing organization and increase our business development resources, including the vertical and geographic distribution of our sales force and our teams of account executives focused on new accounts and responsible for renewal and growth of existing accounts.

 

Our business requires that our sales personnel have particular expertise and experience in interoperability of audio systems, and the latest wireless audio technology. We may not achieve revenue growth from expanding our sales force if we are unable to hire, develop and retain talented sales personnel with appropriate experience, if our new sales personnel are unable to achieve desired productivity levels in a reasonable period of time or if our sales and marketing programs are not effective.

 

Interruptions or performance problems associated with technology and wireless technology outside of our control may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

We may in the future experience performance issues due to a variety of factors, including wireless technology disruptions, human or software errors. If a wireless connection is compromised, our products will not work as designed and our business could be negatively affected. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these performance problems within an acceptable period of time or a connection problem may be out of our control and could deter customers from purchasing wireless audio components.

 

We expect to continue to make significant investments to maintain and improve the performance of our modules. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed and continually develop our technology to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.

 

Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in our modules could adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects.

 

Because our modules are complex, undetected errors, failures or bugs may occur. Our module is installed and used in numerous audio systems of different brands with different operating systems, system management software, and equipment and networking configurations, which may cause errors or failures of our technology. Despite our testing, errors, failures or bugs may not be found in our modules until it is released to our customers. Moreover, our customers could incorrectly implement or inadvertently misuse our modules, which could result in customer dissatisfaction and adversely impact the perceived quality or utility of our products as well as our brand.

 

Any of these real or perceived errors, compatibility issues, failures or bugs in our modules could result in negative publicity, reputational harm, loss of competitive position or claims by customers for losses sustained by them. In such an event, we may be required, or may choose, for customer relations or other reasons, to expend additional resources in order to correct the problem. Alleviating any of these problems could require significant expenditures of our capital and other resources and could cause interruptions or delays in the use of our solutions, which could cause us to lose existing or potential customers and could adversely affect our operating results and growth prospects.

 

We rely on the cooperation of our customers to install our modules in their audio products.

 

Our modules are sold to our customers who are consumer electronics companies. Our customers install the modules into their products. Our customers’ audio products are sold to the general public who must then install the audio system into their homes or businesses. We do not oversee installation of our products and therefor have no control over the end result. If a module is not installed correctly in a customer product or an end consumer does not install their audio system correctly, our technology may not work properly, which could result in customer dissatisfaction or have a material adverse impact on our reputation, our business and our financial results.

 

14 

 

 

If we do not or cannot maintain cutting edge technology and compatibility of our modules with products that our customers use, our business could suffer.

 

Our customers integrate our modules into their products. The functionality and popularity of our technology depends, in part, on our ability to produce modules that integrate into our customers’ products. Our customers may change the features of their technologies and audio systems as a whole may advance technologically. Such changes could functionally limit or terminate the utility of our product, which could negatively impact our customer service and harm our business. If we fail to maintain cutting edge technology and compatibility with the products our customers produce, we may not be able to offer the functionality that our customers need, and our customers may not purchase our modules, which would negatively impact our ability to generate revenue and adversely impact our business.

 

Our future quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly due to a wide range of factors, which makes our future results difficult to predict.

 

Our revenues and results of operations could vary significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of various factors, many of which are outside of our control, including:

 

  the expansion of our customer base;

 

  the renewal of agreements with, and expansion of coverage by, existing customers;

 

  the size, timing and terms of our sales to both existing and new customers;

 

  the introduction of products or services that may compete with us for the limited funds available to our customers, and changes in the cost of such products or services;

 

  changes in our customers’ and potential customers’ budgets;

 

  our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses;

 

  our ability to hire, train and maintain our direct sales force, engineers, and marketing employees;

 

  the timing of satisfying revenue recognition criteria in connection with initial deployment and renewals; and

 

  general economic and political conditions, both domestically and internationally.

 

Any one of these or other factors discussed elsewhere in this prospectus may result in fluctuations in our revenues and operating results, meaning that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenues, results of operations and cash flows may not necessarily be indicative of our future performance.

 

Because of the fluctuations described above, our ability to forecast revenues is limited and we may not be able to accurately predict our future revenues or results of operations. In addition, we base our current and future expense levels on our operating plans and sales forecasts, and our operating expenses are expected to be relatively fixed in the short term. Accordingly, we may not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for an unexpected shortfall in revenues, and even a small shortfall in revenues could disproportionately and adversely affect our financial results for that quarter. The variability and unpredictability of these and other factors could result in our failing to meet or exceed financial expectations for a given period.

 

15 

 

  

We conduct international operations, which exposes us to significant risks.

 

Our main office is in Oregon, but we also have employees in Japan and Taiwan and representatives in China and the Republic of Korea. Operating in international markets requires significant resources and management attention and subjects us to regulatory, economic and political risks in addition to those we already face in the United States. In addition, we invest time and resources in understanding the regulatory framework and political environments of our customers overseas in order to focus our sales efforts. Because such regulatory and political considerations are likely to vary across jurisdictions, this effort requires additional time and attention from our sales team and could lead to a sales cycle that is longer than our typical process for sales in the United States. We also may need to hire additional employees and otherwise invest in our international operations in order to reach new customers. Because of our limited experience with international operations as well as developing and managing sales in international markets, our international efforts may not be successful.

 

In addition, we will face risks in doing business internationally that could adversely affect our business, including:

 

  the potential impact of currency exchange fluctuations;

 

  the difficulty of staffing and managing international operations and the increased operations, travel, shipping and compliance costs associated with having customers in numerous international locations;

 

  potentially greater difficulty collecting accounts receivable and longer payment cycles;

 

  the availability of coverage by wireless and internet carriers in international markets;

 

  higher or more variable costs associated with wireless and internet carriers and other service providers;

 

  the need to offer customer support in various languages;

 

  challenges in understanding and complying with local laws, regulations and customs in foreign jurisdictions;

 

  export controls and economic sanctions administered by the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security and the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control;

 

  compliance with various anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and United Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010;

 

  tariffs and other non-tariff barriers, such as quotas and local content rules;

 

  more limited protection for our intellectual property in some countries;

 

  adverse or uncertain tax consequences as a result of international operations;

 

  currency control regulations, which might restrict or prohibit our conversion of other currencies into U.S. dollars;

 

  restrictions on the transfer of funds;

 

  deterioration of political relations between the United States and other countries; and

 

  political or social unrest or economic instability in a specific country or region in which we operate, which could have an adverse impact on our operations in that location.

 

Also, we expect that due to costs related to our international efforts and the increased cost of doing business internationally, we will incur higher costs to secure sales to international customers than the comparable costs for domestic customers. As a result, our financial results may fluctuate as we expand our operations and customer base worldwide.

 

Our failure to manage any of these risks successfully could harm our international operations, and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

16 

 

 

We are dependent on the continued services and performance of our senior management and other key personnel, the loss of any of whom could adversely affect our business.

 

Our future success depends in large part on the continued contributions of our senior management and other key personnel. In particular, the leadership of key management personnel is critical to the successful management of our company, the development of our products, and our strategic direction. We also depend on the contributions of key technical personnel.

 

We do not maintain “key person” insurance for any member of our senior management team or any of our other key employees. Our senior management and key personnel are all employed on an at-will basis, which means that they could terminate their employment with us at any time, for any reason and without notice. The loss of any of our key management personnel could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our development and strategic objectives and adversely affect our business.

 

If we are unable to attract, integrate and retain additional qualified personnel, including top technical talent, our business could be adversely affected.

 

Our future success depends in part on our ability to identify, attract, integrate and retain highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and other personnel. We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous other companies, including other software and technology companies, many of whom have greater financial and other resources than we do. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high-quality candidates than those we have to offer. In addition, new hires often require significant training and, in many cases, take significant time before they achieve full productivity. We may incur significant costs to attract and retain qualified personnel, including significant expenditures related to salaries and benefits and compensation expenses related to equity awards, and we may lose new employees to our competitors or other companies before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them. Moreover, new employees may not be or become as productive as we expect, as we may face challenges in adequately or appropriately integrating them into our workforce and culture. If we are unable to attract, integrate and retain suitably qualified individuals who are capable of meeting our growing technical, operational and managerial requirements, on a timely basis or at all, our business will be adversely affected.

 

Volatility or lack of positive performance in our share price may also affect our ability to attract and retain our key employees. Many of our senior management personnel and other key employees have become, or will soon become, vested in a substantial amount of common stock or warrants to purchase common stock. Employees may be more likely to leave us if the shares they own or the shares underlying their vested warrants have significantly appreciated in value relative to the original purchase prices of the shares or the exercise prices of the warrants, or, conversely, if the exercise prices of the warrants that they hold are significantly above the market price of our common stock. If we are unable to appropriately incentivize and retain our employees through equity compensation, or if we need to increase our compensation expenses in order to appropriately incentivize and retain our employees, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

 

MARCorp Signal, LLC and its parent, MARCorp Financial LLC (collectively, “MARCorp”), have not released a lien on our assets in connection with a May 2017 original issue discount convertible promissory note issued to MARCorp. 

 

On May 17, 2017, we issued MARCorp a $5,882,353 original issue discount convertible promissory note (the “Series E Convertible Note”) in consideration for gross proceeds of $5,000,000. On November 2, 2017, we received a default notice from MARCorp alleging that we were in default under the Series E Convertible Note and on November 30, 2017, we received a payoff letter from MARCorp requesting, in addition to default interest, penalties and other fees, including additional warrants to purchase 487,864 shares of common stock due as a result of such default payments due, that we agree to fully release all future claims against them. Notwithstanding the fact that we have repaid MARCorp, they have refused to release the liens on our assets. In the event we are unsuccessful in having MARCorp’s liens removed, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, we are disputing MARCorp’s claim to the additional 487,864 warrants.  Any legal proceedings initiated in connection with this dispute could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve and could divert management’s attention and resources.  Furthermore, if we were to lose our argument that we do not owe MARCorp the additional 487,864, you will suffer additional dilution beyond the fully diluted calculation that we have included in the financial statements in this prospectus.

  

We may be subject to litigation for a variety of claims, which could adversely affect our results of operations, harm our reputation or otherwise negatively impact our business.

 

We may be subject to litigation for a variety of claims arising from our normal business activities. These may include claims, suits, and proceedings involving labor and employment, wage and hour, commercial and other matters. The outcome of any litigation, regardless of its merits, is inherently uncertain. Any claims and lawsuits, and the disposition of such claims and lawsuits, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, divert management attention and resources, and lead to attempts on the part of other parties to pursue similar claims. Any adverse determination related to litigation could adversely affect our results of operations, harm our reputation or otherwise negatively impact our business. In addition, depending on the nature and timing of any such dispute, a resolution of a legal matter could materially affect our future operating results, our cash flows or both.

 

17 

 

 

Changes in financial accounting standards may cause adverse and unexpected revenue fluctuations and impact our reported results of operations.

 

A change in accounting standards or practices could harm our operating results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may harm our operating results or the way we conduct our business.

 

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

 

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

 

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect proprietary methods and technologies that we develop or license under patent and other intellectual property laws of the United States, so that we can prevent others from using our inventions and proprietary information. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technology, and our business might be adversely affected. However, defending our intellectual property rights might entail significant expenses. Any of our patent rights, copyrights, trademarks or other intellectual property rights may be challenged by others, weakened or invalidated through administrative process or litigation.

 

As of January 19, 2018, we had eight issued and two pending U.S. patents covering our technology. We have patent applications pending for examination in one other jurisdictions around the world. We also license issued U.S. patents from others. The patents that we own or license from others (including those that may be issued in the future) may not provide us with any competitive advantages or may be challenged by third parties, and our patent applications may never be granted.

 

Additionally, the process of obtaining patent protection is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Even if issued, there can be no assurance that these patents will adequately protect our intellectual property, as the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of patent and other intellectual property rights are uncertain.

 

Any patents that are issued may subsequently be invalidated or otherwise limited, allowing other companies to develop offerings that compete with ours, which could adversely affect our competitive business position, business prospects and financial condition. In addition, issuance of a patent does not guarantee that we have a right to practice the patented invention. Patent applications in the United States are typically not published until 18 months after filing or, in some cases, not at all, and publications of discoveries in industry-related literature lag behind actual discoveries. We cannot be certain that third parties do not have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from marketing or practicing our patented software or technology.

 

Effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available to us in every country in which our software is available. The laws of some foreign countries may not be as protective of intellectual property rights as those in the United States (in particular, some foreign jurisdictions do not permit patent protection for software), and mechanisms for enforcement of intellectual property rights may be inadequate. Additional uncertainty may result from changes to intellectual property legislation enacted in the United States, including the recent America Invents Act, and other national governments and from interpretations of the intellectual property laws of the United States and other countries by applicable courts and agencies. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may be unable to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property.

 

We rely in part on trade secrets, proprietary know-how and other confidential information to maintain our competitive position. Although we endeavor to enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees, licensees and others who may have access to this information, we cannot assure you that these agreements or other steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use, disclosure or reverse engineering of our technology. Moreover, third parties may independently develop technologies or products that compete with ours, and we may be unable to prevent this competition.

 

18 

 

 

We might be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights. We may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our proprietary rights. Litigation also puts our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Additionally, we may provoke third parties to assert counterclaims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially viable. Any litigation, whether or not resolved in our favor, could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, which may adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

 

We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims by third parties, which are extremely costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies.

 

Companies in the software and technology industries, including some of our current and potential competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, many of these companies have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that may be brought against them. The litigation may involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners that have no relevant product revenues and against which our patents may therefore provide little or no deterrence. We have received, and may in the future receive, notices that claim we have misappropriated, misused, or infringed other parties’ intellectual property rights, and, to the extent we gain greater market visibility, we face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims.

 

There may be third-party intellectual property rights, including issued or pending patents that cover significant aspects of our technologies or business methods. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be very time-consuming, could be expensive to settle or litigate and could divert our management’s attention and other resources. These claims could also subject us to significant liability for damages, potentially including treble damages if we are found to have willfully infringed patents or copyrights. These claims could also result in our having to stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We might be required to seek a license for the intellectual property, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Even if a license were available, we could be required to pay significant royalties, which would increase our operating expenses. As a result, we may be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for any infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit or stop sales of our software and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results would adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

 

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, or if we infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, our business may be harmed.

 

Our success depends in part on intellectual property rights to the products that we develop. We rely on a combination of contractual rights, including non-disclosure agreements, trade secrets, copyrights and trademarks, to establish and protect our intellectual property rights in our names, services, methodologies and related technologies. If we lose intellectual property protection or the ability to secure intellectual property protection on any of our names, confidential information or technology, this could harm our business. Our intellectual property rights may not prevent competitors from independently developing services and methodologies similar to ours, and the steps we take might be inadequate to deter infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property by competitors, former employees or other third parties, any of which could harm our business. We own registered trademarks in the United States that have various expiration dates unless renewed through customary processes. Our trademark registrations may be unenforceable or ineffective in protecting our trademarks. Our trademarks may be unenforceable in countries outside of the United States, which may adversely affect our ability to build our brand outside of the United States.

 

Although we believe that our conduct of our business does not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, third parties may nevertheless assert infringement claims against us in the future. We may be required to modify our products, services, internal systems or technologies, or obtain a license to permit our continued use of those rights. We may be unable to do so in a timely manner, or upon reasonable terms and conditions, which could harm our business. In addition, future litigation over these matters could result in substantial costs and resource diversion. Adverse determinations in any litigation or proceedings of this type could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties and could prevent us from using some of our services, internal systems or technologies.

 

19 

 

 

Risks Related to this Offering and Ownership of Our Common Stock

 

There has been no prior market for our common stock. An active market may not develop or be sustainable and investors may not be able to resell their common stock at or above the initial public offering price.

 

There has been no public market for shares of our common stock prior to this offering. The initial public offering price for our common stock will be determined through negotiations between the underwriter and us and may vary from the market price of our common stock following the completion of this offering. If you purchase shares of common stock in this offering, you may not be able to resell those shares at or above the initial public offering price. An active or liquid market in our common stock may not develop upon completion of this offering or, if it does develop, it may not be sustainable.

 

The share price of our common stock may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, resulting in substantial losses for investors purchasing shares of common stock in this offering.

 

The initial public offering price for shares of common stock sold in this offering will be determined by negotiation between the representatives of the underwriter and us. This price may not reflect the market price of our common stock following the completion of this offering. In addition, we expect the market price of our common stock may be volatile for the foreseeable future. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the factors listed below and other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section:

 

  actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

 

  the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections;

 

  failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our company, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;

 

  ratings changes by any securities analysts who follow our company;

 

  announcements by us of significant technical innovations, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

 

  changes in operating performance and common stock market valuations of other software companies generally;

 

  price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the economy as a whole;

 

  changes in our board of directors or management;

 

  sales of large blocks of our common stock, including sales by our executive officers, directors and significant stockholders;

 

  lawsuits threatened or filed against us;

 

  short sales, hedging and other derivative transactions involving our common stock;

 

  general economic conditions in the United States and abroad; and

 

  other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism or responses to these events.

 

In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many software companies. Stock prices of many software companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

 

20 

 

 

Substantial future sales of shares of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

 

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market following the completion of this offering, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that such sales may have on the prevailing market price of our common stock.

 

All of our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock are subject to lock-up agreements that restrict the stockholders’ ability to transfer shares for 180 days from the date of this prospectus. Subject to certain exceptions, the lock-up agreements limit the amount of common stock that may be sold immediately following this initial public offering. Subject to certain limitations, as of January 30, 2018, approximately 18,370 shares of common stock, 3,725,014 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, 4,739,527 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible promissory notes and 2,114,118 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding shares of preferred stock will become eligible for sale upon expiration of the 180-day lock-up period. The underwriter of this offering may, in their sole discretion, permit our stockholders who are subject to these lock-up agreements to sell common stock prior to the expiration of the lock-up agreements.

 

Purchasers in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the book value of their investment.

 

The initial public offering price of our common stock will be substantially higher than the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock outstanding immediately following the completion of this offering. Therefore, if you purchase shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ ______ per share, you will experience immediate dilution of $          per share, the difference between the price per share you pay for our common stock and its pro forma net tangible book value per share as of _______, 2018, after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock in this offering. This dilution is due in large part to the fact that our earlier investors paid substantially less than the initial public offering price when they purchased shares of common stock.

 

In addition, we have issued warrants to acquire common stock at prices significantly below the initial public offering price. To the extent outstanding warrants are ultimately exercised, there will be further dilution to investors purchasing our common stock in this offering. In addition, if we issue additional equity securities, there is a vesting of employee stock grants, or there are any exercises of future stock options, you will experience additional dilution.

 

If we are not able to comply with the applicable continued listing requirements or standards of the NASDAQ Capital Market, NASDAQ could delist our common stock.

 

In conjunction with this offering we will apply to list our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market. Should our common stock be listed on NASDAQ, in order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other continued listing requirements and standards, including those regarding director independence and independent committee requirements, minimum stockholders’ equity, minimum share price, and certain corporate governance requirements. There can be no assurances that we will be able to comply with the applicable listing standards.

 

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

 

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business, our market and our competitors. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our common stock or change their opinion of our common stock, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

 

21 

 

 

We may invest or spend the proceeds of this offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways that may not yield a return.

 

We currently intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering primarily for research and development, debt repayment and general corporate purposes, including working capital, sales and marketing activities, general and administrative matters and capital expenditures. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering for the acquisition of, or strategic investment in, technologies, solutions or businesses that complement our business, although we have no present commitments or agreements to enter into any such acquisition or investment. Our management will have considerable discretion in the application of the net proceeds, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. The net proceeds may be used for purposes that do not increase the value of our business, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

 

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

 

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although we will cease to be an “emerging growth company” upon the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of this offering, (ii) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues are $1.07 billion or more, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous rolling three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities or (iv) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. We cannot predict if investors will find shares of our common stock less attractive or our company less comparable to certain other public companies because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

 

We will incur substantial increased costs as a result of being a public company.

 

As a public company, we will incur significant levels of legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. We will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the NASDAQ (should our common stock be listed on NASDAQ), and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and operating results. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. Although we have already hired additional corporate employees to comply with these requirements, we may need to hire more corporate employees in the future or engage outside consultants, which would increase our costs and expenses.

 

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time-consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.

 

22 

 

 

We also expect that being a public company and these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

 

As a result of disclosure of information in this prospectus and in the filings that we will be required to make as a public company, our business, operating results and financial condition will become more visible, which may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If any such claims are successful, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

If we fail to make necessary improvements to address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by our independent registered public accounting firm, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately and timely or prevent fraud, any of which could cause our reported financial results to be materially misstated and result in the loss of investor confidence or delisting and cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

 

Our independent registered public accounting firm has not conducted an audit of our internal control over financial reporting. However, in connection with the audits of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, our independent registered public accounting firm identified in their report to our audit committee that we had material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 due to (i) inadequate segregation of duties; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP, and SEC guidelines. A material weakness is defined in the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management and independent registered public accounting firm did not and were not required to perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 in accordance with the provisions of the JOBS Act.

 

We are in the process of taking steps intended to remedy these material weaknesses, and we will not be able to fully address these material weaknesses until these steps have been completed. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” for information regarding our remediation efforts. If we fail to further increase and maintain the number and expertise of our staff for our accounting and finance functions and to improve and maintain internal control over financial reporting adequate to meet the demands that will be placed upon us as a public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may be unable to report our financial results accurately and prevent fraud. In addition, we cannot be certain that any such steps we undertake will successfully remediate the material weaknesses or that other material weaknesses and control deficiencies will not be discovered in the future. If our remediation efforts are not successful or other material weaknesses or control deficiencies occur in the future, we may be unable to report our financial results accurately or on a timely basis, which could cause our reported financial results to be materially misstated and result in the loss of investor confidence or delisting and cause our stock price to decline. As a result of such failures, we could also become subject to investigations by the NASDAQ Stock Market (should our common stock be listed on NASDAQ), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, or other regulatory authorities, and become subject to litigation from investors and stockholders, any of which could harm our reputation and financial condition, and divert financial and management resources. Even if we are able to report our consolidated financial statements accurately and timely, if we do not make all the necessary improvements to address the material weaknesses, continued disclosure of our material weaknesses will be required in future filings with the SEC, which could reduce investor confidence in our reported results and our cause our stock price to decline.

 

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments.

 

23 

 

 

Our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders own a significant percentage of our common stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

 

Following this offering, our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, some of whom are represented on our board of directors, together with their affiliates will beneficially own ____% of the voting power of our outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, these stockholders will, immediately following this offering, be able to determine the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval. This ownership could affect the value of your shares of common stock by, for example, these stockholders electing to delay, defer or prevent a change in corporate control, merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination. This concentration of ownership may also adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, and further provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or stockholders.

 

Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for: (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (ii) any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law; (iv) any action regarding our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws; or (v) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the “internal affairs doctrine” as that term is defined in Section 115 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Our certificate of incorporation further provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.  Therefore, any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision that will be contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections of this prospectus entitled “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business,” but are also contained elsewhere in this prospectus. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “objective,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” or “would,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology intended to identify statements about the future. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that we have a reasonable basis for each forward-looking statement contained in this prospectus, we caution you that these statements are based on a combination of facts and factors currently known by us and our expectations of the future, about which we cannot be certain. Forward-looking statements include statements about:

 

  our ability to continue to increase revenue, secure new consumer electronics customers and maintain existing customers;

 

  our ability to continue to add new customers for our public safety and security solutions;

 

  the effects of increased competition as well as innovations by new and existing competitors in our market;

 

  our ability to effectively manage or sustain our growth;

 

24 

 

 

  our ability to maintain, or strengthen awareness of, our solutions and our reputation;

 

  potential acquisitions and integration of complementary business and technologies;

 

  our expected use of proceeds;

 

  perceived or actual integrity, reliability, quality or compatibility problems with our solutions, including related to unscheduled downtime or outages;

 

  statements regarding future revenue, hiring plans, expenses, capital expenditures, capital requirements and stock performance;

 

  our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key personnel and further expand our overall headcount;

 

  our ability to grow both domestically and internationally;

 

  our ability to stay abreast of new or modified laws and regulations that currently apply or become applicable to our business both in the United States and internationally;

 

  our ability to maintain, protect and enhance our intellectual property;

 

  costs associated with defending intellectual property infringement and other claims; and

 

  the future trading prices of our common stock and the impact of securities analysts’ reports on these prices.

 

We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this prospectus.

 

You should refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this prospectus will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame or at all. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, do not protect any forward-looking statements that we make in connection with this offering. In addition, statements that state “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this prospectus, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these statements.

 

You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

 

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

 

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning our industry and the market in which we operate, including our market position, market opportunity and market size, is based on information from various sources, on assumptions that we have made based on such data and other similar sources and on our knowledge of the markets for our products. These data sources involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates.

 

25 

 

 

Neither we nor the underwriter have independently verified any third-party information. While we believe the market position, market opportunity and market size information included in this prospectus is generally reliable, such information is inherently imprecise. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the industry in which we operate is necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties and by us.

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We estimate that the net proceeds from our issuance and sale of ______shares of our common stock in this offering will be approximately $ __________ million, based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $          per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $          per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $          million, assuming that the amount of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us. We may also increase or decrease the number of shares of common stock we are offering. A 1,000,000 share increase or decrease in the number of shares of common stock offered by us would increase or decrease the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $          million, assuming that the assumed initial price to the public remains the same, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us. We do not expect that a change by these amounts in the initial offering price to the public or the common stock offered by us would have a material effect on our uses of the proceeds from this offering, although it may accelerate the time at which we will need to seek additional capital.

 

The principal purposes of this offering are to increase our financial flexibility, create a public market for our common stock and facilitate our future access to the capital markets. Although we have not yet determined with certainty the manner in which we will allocate the net proceeds of this offering, we expect to use the net proceeds from this offering for product development, sales and marketing, working capital and other general corporate purposes, including investments in sales and marketing in the United States and internationally and in research and development. We may also use a portion of the proceeds from this offering for acquisitions or strategic investments in complementary businesses or technologies, although we do not currently have any plans for any such acquisitions or investments. We have not allocated specific amounts of net proceeds for any of these purposes.

 

The expected use of net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our present plans and business conditions. We cannot predict with certainty all of the particular uses for the proceeds of this offering or the amounts that we will actually spend on the uses set forth above. Accordingly, our management will have significant flexibility in applying the net proceeds of this offering. The timing and amount of our actual expenditures will be based on many factors, including cash flows from operations and the anticipated growth of our business. Pending their use, we intend to invest the net proceeds of this offering in a variety of capital-preservation investments, including short- and intermediate-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities.

 

DISTRIBUTION POLICY

 

We have never declared or paid any distributions on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, we do not anticipate declaring or paying cash distributions in the foreseeable future. The payment of distributions will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our results of operations, capital requirements, financial condition, prospects, contractual arrangements, any limitations on payment of distributions present in our current and future debt agreements, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. We are subject to covenants under our debt arrangement that place restrictions on our ability to pay distributions.

 

26 

 

 

CAPITALIZATION

 

The following table sets forth our cash and capitalization as of September 30, 2017:

 

  on an actual basis;

 

 

on a pro forma basis, giving effect to the conversion of the Company to a C Corporation from an LLC and the automatic conversion of all outstanding convertible promissory notes and all outstanding preferred stock into an aggregate of 6,606,271 shares of common stock immediately prior to the completion of this offering; and

 

  on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect the sale by us of _______ shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $____ per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and after using ______ of the net proceeds to pay a portion of the outstanding principal under our debt facility.

 

You should read the information in this table together with the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

    As of September 30, 2017        
                Pro Forma  
(unaudited)   Actual     Pro Forma     As Adjusted  
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 436,404     $ 436,404          
Convertible notes payable     5,867,747              
Preferred units, no par value, 41,438,818, zero and zero units authorized and outstanding - actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted (liquidation preference of $12,432,000 as of September 30, 2017)     64,734,841              
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001, 20,000,000 shares authorized and zero shares issued and outstanding - actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted                  
Members’ Deficit:                        
Common units, no par value, 5,122,221, zero and zero units authorized and outstanding - actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted     13,064,875              
Common stock, par value $0.0001, 200,000,000 shares authorized and zero, 3,104,075 and __ shares issued and outstanding - actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted           310          
Additional paid-in capital           77,799,406          
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (40,750 )     (40,750 )        
Accumulated deficit     (92,112,137 )     (92,112,137 )        
Total members’ deficit     (79,088,012 )     (1,435,171 )        
Total liabilities, preferred units and members’ deficit   $ 1,238,929     $ 1,238,929     $    

 

27 

 

 

DILUTION

 

If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after the completion of this offering.

 

Our historical net tangible book value as of September 30, 2017 was ($14,353,171), or ($2.80) per share of common unit. Our historical net tangible book value per share represents our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the common units outstanding as of September 30, 2017.

 

Our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2017 was ($14,353,171), or ($____) per share of common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value per share represents our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2017, after giving effect to the conversion of the Company to a C Corporation from an LLC and the conversion of all outstanding convertible promissory notes and all shares of our outstanding preferred stock into an aggregate of 6,606,271 shares of common stock immediately prior to the closing of this offering.

 

Our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value represents our pro forma net tangible book value, plus the effect of (1) the sale of _______ shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and (2) the use of $________ in net proceeds to repay our debt. Our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2017 was $ _______, or $ per share of common stock. This amount represents an immediate increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $ _____ per share to our existing stockholders.

 

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis to new investors:

 

Assumed initial public offering price per share           $    
Historical net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2017   $ (2.80 )        
Increase per share attributable to the pro forma transactions described above   $          
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2017   $          
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributed to new investors purchasing share from us in this offering   $            
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering           $    
Dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share to new investors in this offering           $    

   

The dilution information discussed above is illustrative only and will change based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering to be determined at pricing. Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $__ per share would increase (decrease) the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share by approximately $ ___ , assuming the number of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions. Assuming an initial public offering price of $___ per share (the midpoint of the range), an additional ___warrants could be exercised which would result in the increase to the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $___ per share.

 

28 

 

 

The following table summarizes as of September 30, 2017, on the pro forma as adjusted basis described above, the number of shares of our common stock, the total consideration and the average price per share (1) paid to us by our existing stockholders and (2) to be paid by investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $_____ per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

            Weighted-
Average Price
Per Share
 
    Shares Purchased     Total Consideration      
    Number     Percent     Amount     Percent      
Existing stockholders               %   $           %   $        
New investors                                            
Total             100.0 %   $         100.0 %   $        

 

The outstanding share information in the table above is based on 6,606,271 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2017, and excludes as of such date all warrants outstanding.

 

As of September 30, 2017, there were 2,862,970 warrants outstanding for the purchase of shares of common stock. To the extent that warrants are exercised, new options or other securities are issued under our equity incentive plans, or we issue additional shares of common stock in the future, there will be further dilution to investors participating in this offering. In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital because of market conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.

 

29 

 

 

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

 

The following tables set forth a summary of our historical financial data as of and for the periods indicated. We have derived the selected statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the selected statements of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2017, and the selected balance sheet data as of September 30, 2017, from our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have prepared the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and have included, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair statement of the financial information set forth in those statements. You should read this data together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and the information under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The summary financial data included in this section are not intended to replace the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future results, and our interim results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2017, or any other period.

 

                 
    Year ended December 31,     Nine months ended September 30,  
    2015     2016     2016     2017  
Revenue, net   $ 2,111,995     $ 1,273,113     $ 990,915     $ 901,454  
Cost of revenue     2,206,751       1,533,790       1,222,092       1,028,871  
Gross profit     (94,756 )     (260,677 )     (231,177 )     (127,417 )
                                 
Operating Expenses:                                
Research and development     5,748,282       5,218,958       4,280,693       2,783,064  
Sales and marketing     2,168,383       2,049,265       1,582,628       1,251,887  
General and administrative     809,205       967,690       723,992       856,697  
Total operating expenses     8,725,870       8,235,913       6,587,313       4,891,648  
                                 
Loss from operations     (8,820,626 )     (8,496,590 )     (6,818,490 )     (5,019,065 )
Interest expense     (392,284 )     (1,863,746 )     (1,134,469 )     (7,654,750 )
Change in fair value of warrant liability           568,103       51,142       3,203,468  
Other income (expense), net     125,727       93,399       (5,061 )     (7,630 )
Loss before provision for income taxes     (9,087,183 )     (9,698,834 )     (7,906,878 )     (9,477,977 )
Provision for income taxes     9,922       9,435       3,622       2,950  
Net loss   $ (9,097,105 )   $ (9,708,269 )   $ (7,910,500 )   $ (9,480,927 )
Net loss per common unit - basic and diluted   $ (0.40 )   $ (0.49 )   $ (0.32 )   $ (1.85 )
Weighted average number of common units used in computing net loss per common unit     22,604,551       19,785,238       24,779,040       5,122,221  
Pro forma net loss per common share - basic and diluted (1)   $ (6.04 )   $ (7.36 )   $ (4.79 )   $ (27.76 )
Pro forma weighted average number of common shares used in computing                                
 pro forma net loss per common share (1)     1,506,970       1,319,016       1,651,936       341,481  
Pro forma as adjusted net loss per common share - basic and diluted (2)                           $ (3.05 )
Pro forma as adjusted weighted average number of common shares used in computing pro forma as adjusted net loss per common share (2)                             3,104,043  

 

   December 31,   September 30, 
   2015   2016   2017 
Consolidated balance sheet data:               
Cash and cash equivalents  $25,438   $92,262   $436,404 
Working capital   (2,951,772)   (6,557,078)   (8,528,874)
Total assets   1,071,575    942,639    1,238,929 
Total debt   1,782,533    3,855,100    5,867,747 
Total members’ deficit   (2,663,776)   (72,755,396)   (79,088,012)

 

 

(1)Pro forma shows the reclassification of preferred and common units to preferred and common stock in connection with the Company’s conversion from an LLC to a C Corporation.

(2)Pro forma as adjusted shows both the conversion of the Company from an LLC to a C Corporation as well as the conversion of all preferred stock to common stock in connection with the Company’s initial public offering.

 

30 

 

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

 

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operation should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and information relating to our business that reflect our current views and assumptions with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the risks in the section entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 10, that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

 

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this prospectus. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any update or revisions of any of the forward-looking statements to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or to conform these statements to actual results.

 

Overview

 

We were formed as Summit Semiconductor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on July 23, 2010. We converted to a Delaware corporation, effective December 31, 2017, at which time we changed our name to Summit Semiconductor, Inc. We run our operations through Summit Semiconductor, Inc., as well as through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Summit Semiconductor K.K., a Japanese corporation and WiSA, LLC, a California limited liability company. The address of our corporate headquarters is 6840 Via Del Oro, Ste. 280, San Jose, CA 95119. Our website address is www.summitwireless.com. The information contained in or accessible through our website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and is intended for informational purposes only.

 

We are an early stage technology company and our primary business focus is to enable mainstream consumers and audio enthusiasts to experience high quality audio. We intend to continue selling our semiconductors and wireless modules to consumer electronics companies while also increasing our focus on implementing a software licensing business segment.

 

Our plan also anticipates that our technology will address some of the main issues that we perceive are hindering the growth of the home theater: complexity and cost. We believe consumers want to experience theater quality surround sound from the comfort of their homes. However, wired home theater systems often require expensive audio-visual (AV) receivers to decode the audio stream, leaving the consumer with the burden of concealing the wires. Hiring a professional to hide the wires into the walls or floor is invasive, complicated, costly and time consuming. Further, people that rent as opposed to own may not be able to install these systems as the installation construction needed may not be permitted under a lease agreement. Our first-generation wireless technology addresses these problems by transmitting wireless audio to each speaker at Blu-ray quality (uncompressed 24bit audio up to 96k sample rates) and emphasizing ease of setup. To our knowledge, Summit’s custom chip and module technology is one of the only technologies available today that can stream up to eight separate wireless audio channels with low latency, removing lip-sync issues between the audio and video sources. In addition, every speaker within a system that utilizes our technology can be synchronized to less than one micro second, thus eliminating phase distortion between speakers. Summit’s first-generation technology shows that wireless home theater systems are viable home audio solutions for the average consumer and audio enthusiast alike.

 

We are currently developing certain proprietary software that we believe will provide similar functionality and quality and allow us to enable smart devices, that have Wi-Fi and video media, to deliver surround sound audio. We believe our software based-solution which other brands can integrate into their devices and will (i) reduce integration costs for mass market use, (ii) utilize Wi-Fi for wireless connectivity, making the need for complex physical wire installations unnecessary (iii) provide a low power consumption option to allow for use in battery powered devices, and (iv) provide compatibility with Linux, iOS or Android operating systems.

 

To date, our operations have been funded through sales of our common equity, debt instruments, and revenue from the sale of our products. Our consolidated financial statements contemplate the continuation of our business as a going concern. However, we are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with an emerging business, as noted above we have no established source of capital, and we have incurred recurring losses from operations since inception. These matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. 

 

31 

 

 

Plan of Operation

 

Our plan of operation is to focus our efforts in offering a suite of technologies that will enable mainstream consumers and audio enthusiasts to experience high quality audio. We intend to continue selling our semiconductors and wireless modules to consumer electronics companies while also increasing our focus on implementing a software licensing business segment.

 

We have designed wireless modules that provide high performance wireless audio for our customers to build into their products like a speaker, TV, or dongle for example. These modules include our custom semiconductors with our IP built in as well as a Wi-Fi radio for communications. By designing and selling these modules we can reduce our customers design expense, accelerate their time-to-market cycle, and reduce the cost of each module. Summit offers both a “TX” module to transmit the audio from a host device like a media hub, TV or dongle to WiSA enabled speakers and an “RX” model for speakers, that receives the wireless audio signal and processes it for audio play out.

 

Industry Background

 

The wireless audio market is expected to grow from $16.13 billion in 2016 to $31.80 billion by 2023 according to a June 2017 report by Markets and MarketsTM research firm available at www.marketsandmarkets.com. The information contained in or accessible through the foregoing website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and is intended for informational purposes only. The primary growth segments for in home entertainment have been “Bluetooth” stereo accessories which include single speakers, headsets, and more recently, “multi-room” stereo speakers that use your home’s Wi-Fi network to stream audio throughout the house. The recent emergence of the latter component audio system has presented issues in latency and quality among wireless devices, which Summit’s technology aims to fix.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain accounting policies and estimates are particularly important to the understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management or can be materially affected by changes from period to period in economic factors or conditions that are outside of our control. As a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, our management uses their judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on our historical operations, our future business plans and projected financial results, our observance of trends in the industry and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for a more complete description of our significant accounting policies.

 

Upon the filing of our initial registration statement, we intend to utilize the extended transition period provided in Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(B) as allowed by Section 107(b)(1) of the JOBS Act for the adoption of new or revised accounting standards as applicable to emerging growth companies. As part of the election, we will not be required to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standard until such time that a company that does not qualify as an “issuer” (as defined under Section 2(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) is required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

 

As an emerging growth company within the meaning of the rules under the Securities Act, and we will utilize certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not emerging growth companies. For example, we will not have to provide an auditor’s attestation report on our internal control in future annual reports on Form 10-K as otherwise required by Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can utilize the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to utilize this extended transition period. Our consolidated financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards as they become applicable to public companies.

 

32 

 

 

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2017

 

Revenue

 

Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $901,000, a decrease of ($89,000) or 9%, compared to the same period of 2016. The decrease in revenue was attributable to slightly lower module sales and WISA membership renewals.

 

Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses 

 

Cost of Revenue 

 

Cost of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $1,029,000, a decrease of ($193,000) compared to the same period of 2016. Cost of revenue decreased $135,000 as a direct result of the reduced revenue between comparable time periods, decreased salary and benefit expense of $94,000 and decreased warrant compensation charges of approximately $41,000, partially offset by inventory obsolescence charges of $69,000. 

 

Research and development 

 

Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $2,783,000, a decrease of ($1,498,000) compared to the same period of 2016. The decrease in research and development expenses is primarily related to reduced salary and benefit expense of $1,013,000, as we reduced our average headcount by seven employees, reduced consulting expenses of $79,000 and reduced warrant compensation charges of approximately $358,000.

 

Sales and marketing 

 

Sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $1,252,000, a decrease of ($331,000) compared to the same period of 2016. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses is primarily related to reduced salary and benefit expense of $143,000, as we reduced our average headcount by two employees, reduced warrant compensation charges of approximately $143,000, and reduced consulting expenses of $35,000.

 

General and Administrative 

 

General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $857,000, an increase of $133,000 compared to the same period of 2016. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily related to increased salary and benefit expenses of $76,000, as we increased our headcount by one employee, increased consulting and accounting expenses of $66,000 and $30,000 respectively, as we prepare for an initial public offering (“IPO”), increased legal expenses of $25,000, partially offset by reduced warrant compensation charges of approximately $61,000. Over time, we expect our administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars due to continued growth in headcount to support our business and operations as a public company.

 

Interest Expense 

 

Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $7,655,000, an increase of $6,520,000 compared to the same period of 2016. Interest expense increased primarily due to increased amortization of debt discount charges of $5,256,000 as well as an increase in total debt of $9,170,000 between the comparison periods.

 

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

 

Change in fair value of warrant liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $3,203,000, an increase of $3,152,000 compared to the same period of 2016. Warrant liability increased due to the issuance of warrants in connection with the additional $7,519,000 of convertible note financings between comparison periods.

 

33 

 

 

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2016

 

Revenue

 

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,273,000, a decrease of ($839,000) or 40%, compared to the same period of 2015. Our largest three customers in 2015 purchased our modules to launch new products in late 2015 and early 2016. Two of the three aforementioned customers overestimated customer demand requiring them to reduce their purchases in 2016 or not purchase at all. The third customer had technical difficulties, not related to our module, and did not begin shipments until late 2016 and thus did not make any purchases from us in 2016.

 

Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses 

 

Cost of Revenue 

 

Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,534,000, a decrease of ($673,000) compared to the same period of 2015. Cost of revenue decreased as a direct result of the reduced revenue between comparable time periods partially offset by increased warrant compensation charges of approximately $41,000. 

 

Research and development 

 

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $5,219,000, a decrease of ($529,000) compared to the same period of 2015. The decrease in research and development expenses is primarily related to reduced salary and benefit expense of $307,000, as we reduced our average headcount by two employees, reduced consulting expenses of $433,000 as we completed development of our first-generation product, partially offset by increased warrant compensation charges of approximately $358,000.

 

Sales and marketing 

 

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $2,049,000, a decrease of ($119,000) compared to the same period of 2015. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses is primarily related to reduced salary and benefit expense of $233,000, as we reduced our headcount by two employees, a decrease in travel and tradeshow expenses of $139,000 as we reduced costs to offset our reduced revenue, offset in part by increased warrant compensation charges of approximately $143,000 and an increase in consulting expenses of $126,000 as we expanded our sales efforts in Korea.

 

General and Administrative 

 

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $968,000, an increase of $158,000 compared to the same period of 2015. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily related to increased warrant compensation charges of approximately $61,000, increased accounting fees of $44,000 as we completed an audit of our 2015 and 2016 consolidated financial statements and increased legal fees of $35,000 associated with the various secured debt offerings. Over time, we expect our administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars due to continued growth in headcount to support our business and operations as a public company.

 

Interest Expense 

 

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,864,000, an increase of $1,471,000 compared to the same period of 2015. Interest expense increased primarily due to an increase in total debt of $2,073,000 and a significant increase in interest rates.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2017 were $436,000 compared to $92,000 as of December 31, 2016. The increase in cash and cash equivalents during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was directly related to the receipt of $675,000 pursuant to the Series E Convertible Notes on September 26, 2017.

 

34 

 

  

We incurred a net loss of ($9,481,000) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and used net cash in operating activities of ($7,111,000). For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 we incurred a net loss of ($7,911,000) and used net cash in operating activities of ($4,963,000). Excluding non-cash adjustments, the primary reasons for the increased use of net cash from operating activities in September 30, 2017 is related to the use of cash to pay down accounts payable and accrued liabilities by ($196,000) and ($1,131,000), respectively, compared to increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $219,000 and $1,106,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The receipt of the Series E Convertible Note funding beginning in May 2017 allowed the Company to pay down its obligations which had been delayed due to limited funding.

 

We are an early stage company and have generated losses from operations since inception. In order to execute our long-term strategic plan to further develop and fully commercialize our core products, we will need to raise additional funds, through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, or other means. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company borrowed an additional $7,519,000 from secured lenders.

 

During the next 12 months we anticipate the need to raise a net amount of approximately $7,000,000 of which $3,000,000 is allocated to product development, $2,000,000 to sales and marketing and $2,000,000 for general administrative and corporate purposes. We anticipate that the net proceeds raised in this offering, $_____, will adequately address these capital needs. In the event that we fail to raise at least $7,000,000 in net proceeds from this offering, our business prospects may be significantly hindered. We will need to raise additional funds on terms that may not be attractive, if we are able to raise any additional funding at all. If this offering falls short of meeting our capital needs outlined above, there is no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or an amount of capital necessary to achieve our stated objectives.

 

We can give no assurance that our cash on hand or the additional cash raised in the intended offering will be sufficient to achieve our business plan or that additional financing will be available on reasonable terms, or available at all, or that it will generate sufficient revenue to alleviate the going concern. Should we be unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary financing, or generate sufficient revenue to fund our operations, we would need to curtail our operational activities.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements. 

 

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Prior to this offering we were a private company and have had limited accounting and financial reporting personnel and other resources with which to address our internal controls and procedures. In connection with the audits of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The identified material weaknesses related to (i) inadequate segregation of duties; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP, and SEC guidelines.

 

Our management and independent registered public accounting firm did not and were not required to perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 in accordance with the provisions of the JOBS Act.

 

35 

 

 

We are in the process of taking steps intended to remedy these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by our independent registered public accounting firm. Since the material weaknesses relates at least in part to inadequate staffing, we plan to address it through the hiring of additional personnel in addition to other steps approved by our audit committee. We will not be able to assess whether the steps we are taking will fully remedy the material weaknesses until we have fully implemented them and a sufficient time passes in order to evaluate their effectiveness. If we fail to further increase and maintain the number and expertise of our staff for our accounting and finance functions and to improve and maintain internal control over financial reporting adequate to meet the demands that will be placed upon us as a public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may be unable to report our financial results accurately and prevent fraud. In addition, we cannot be certain that any such measures we undertake will successfully remediate the material weaknesses or that other material weaknesses and control deficiencies will not be discovered in the future. If our remediation efforts are not successful or other material weaknesses or control deficiencies occur in the future, we may be unable to report our financial results accurately or on a timely basis, which could cause our reported financial results to be materially misstated and result in the loss of investor confidence or delisting and cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. As a result of such failures, we could also become subject to investigations by the NASDAQ Stock Market (should we be listed on NADSAQ), the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, and become subject to litigation from investors and stockholders, which could harm our reputation, financial condition or divert financial and management resources. See “Risk Factors—If we fail to make necessary improvements to address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by our independent registered public accounting firm, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately and timely or prevent fraud, any of which could cause our reported financial results to be materially misstated and result in the loss of investor confidence or delisting and cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.”

 

36 

 

  

BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

We believe that the future of audio technology is in wireless devices and that Summit is well positioned to deliver best in class wireless audio technologies to mainstream consumers and audio enthusiasts. According to a report by Markets and MarketsTM research firm4, the wireless audio market is projected to be $31.80 billion by 2023, making it one of the fastest growing consumer segments. We currently sell modules which wirelessly transmit and receive audio directly to speakers, and which are also fully certified and compatible with the Wireless Speaker and Audio (WiSA) Association’s current Compliance Test Specification (CTS), which tests the interoperability and quality of products that offer wireless, interference free, uncompressed High-Definition audio. Additionally, we plan to license our proprietary software technology, currently imbedded in our wireless modules, to other companies who can then embed our technology into other Wi-Fi enabled smart devices. The segment of the wireless audio market that Summit focuses on is comprised of scalable multichannel solutions with levels of latency that are low enough to synchronize with video. The term multichannel refers to the use of multiple audio tracks to reconstruct sound on a multi-speaker sound system.

 

As part of the effort to grow the wireless multichannel home audio segment, Summit was a founding member of the Wireless Speaker and Audio Association (WiSA), an association dedicated to providing industry leadership and consumer choice through interoperability testing between brands. There are currently over 40 brands participating in WiSA. Products certified and marked with a WiSA logo have been tested to interoperate. This preserves consumer choice by enabling consumers to choose different wireless transmitting products across different brands where audio is decoded with speakers that have the WiSA logo displayed. Our marketing strategy focuses on, what we believe, are two emerging wireless audio market needs: better audio quality and lower signal latency. Summit currently sells custom semiconductor chips and wireless modules to a growing list of consumer electronics customers including major brands such as Axiim, Bang & Olufsen, Enclave, Klipsch, LG and Onkyo/Pioneer. We believe that a growing adoption of our technology by leaders in consumer electronics will revolutionize the way people experience media content through their mobile devices, TVs, game consoles and PCs.

 

Our Business Focus

 

Our primary business focus is to enable mainstream consumers and audio enthusiasts to experience high quality audio. We intend to continue selling our semiconductors and wireless modules to consumer electronics companies while also increasing our focus on implementing a software licensing business segment.

 

Industry Background

 

The wireless audio market is expected to grow from $16.13 billion in 2016 to $31.80 billion by 2023 according to a June 2017 report by Markets and MarketsTM research firm available at www.marketsandmarkets.com. The information contained in or accessible through the foregoing website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and is intended for informational purposes only. The primary growth segments for in home entertainment have been “Bluetooth” stereo accessories which include single speakers, headsets, and more recently, “multi-room” stereo speakers that use your home’s Wi-Fi network to stream audio throughout the house. According to a September 2017 article available at www.dealerscope.com the recent emergence of the latter component audio system has presented issues in latency and quality among wireless devices, which Summit’s technology aims to fix. The information contained in or accessible through the foregoing website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and is intended for informational purposes only.

 

37 

 

 

Our Technology

 

Our technology addresses some of the main issues that we perceive are hindering the growth of the home theater: complexity and cost. We believe consumers want to experience theater quality surround sound from the comfort of their homes. However, wired home theater systems often require expensive audio-visual (AV) receivers to decode the audio stream, leaving the consumer with the burden of concealing the wires. Hiring a professional to hide the wires into the walls or floor is invasive, complicated, costly and time consuming. Further, people that rent as opposed to own may not be able to install these systems as the installation construction needed may not be permitted under a lease agreement. Our first-generation wireless technology addresses these problems by transmitting wireless audio to each speaker at Blu-ray quality (uncompressed 24bit audio up to 96k sample rates) and emphasizing ease of setup. To our knowledge, Summit’s custom chip and module technology is one of the only technologies available today that can stream up to eight separate wireless audio channels with low latency, removing lip-sync issues between the audio and video sources. In addition, every speaker within a system that utilizes our technology can be synchronized to less than one micro second, thus eliminating phase distortion between speakers. Summit’s first-generation technology shows that wireless home theater systems are viable home audio solutions for the average consumer and audio enthusiast alike.

 

Summit is currently developing certain proprietary software for which patent applications have been submitted (“Summit second generation technology”) that we believe will provide similar functionality and quality and allow us to enable smart devices, that have Wi-Fi and video media, to deliver surround sound audio. A prototype version of our software technology has been demonstrated to select customers (pursuant to confidentiality agreements) at the recent 2018 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, NV. We plan to use approximately $3 million from this offering to productize our intellectual property through continued invention and robust testing. We believe our software based-solution, which other brands can integrate into their devices, will (i) reduce integration costs for mass market use, (ii) utilize Wi-Fi for wireless connectivity, making the need for complex physical wire installations unnecessary, (iii) provide a low power consumption option to allow for use in battery powered devices, and (iv) provide compatibility with popular consumer electronic operating systems.

 

Additionally, we believe our software based solution will have certain advantages compared to our custom chip and modules we currently have available since our current chips and modules require brands to integrate a separate dedicated Summit transmit module even if a Wi-Fi module is included in the design of the device. Our custom chip and module solution may not be appropriate for integrating into certain devices because it adds to system cost, power consumption, and occupies space. We intend to leverage what we’ve learned from our current products to help us develop a product that can be easily ported to run as software on most any Wi-Fi module and media system on chip (SOC) combination as opposed to a proprietary wireless audio module. This new approach eliminates the cost of a second radio so there is no additional material cost, assuming there is a Wi-Fi module already integrated into the device.

 

WiSA Association

 

Our wholly owned subsidiary, WiSA, LLC is an association comprised of brands, manufacturers, and influencers within the consumer electronics industry, whom agree that a standardized method of interoperability between wireless audio components should exist and most of whom believe that products should be brought to market with this goal in mind. WiSA creates, maintains and manages specifications for wireless interoperability that are available to all association members. For products with a WiSA Certification, WiSA also creates, maintains and manages testing criteria and specifications for all products to be listed, marketed and sold. WiSA Certification is an industrywide “stamp of approval” certifying that a product is interoperable with other WiSA Certified products and has passed several high-performance tests ensuring low levels of latency and tight channel synchronization.

 

Currently, WiSA Certified products are required to use Summit modules in order to meet the standards set by the association. As a result, WiSA members purchase modules from us in order to build their products.

 

Among WiSA-certified products, consumers will be able to outfit their home entertainment system with WiSA certified speakers and components from any participating vendor with the assurance that the devices will interoperate and provide high quality wireless High Definition surround sound.

 

The Association manages logo usage and trademark guidelines, investigates alternative markets, connects brands to manufacturing resources, and provides industry leadership in solving the challenges facing the home theater and commercial markets in the integration of wireless audio technology.

 

38 

 

  

Modules

  

We have designed wireless modules that provide high performance wireless audio for our customers to build into their products like a speaker, TV, or dongle for example. These modules include our custom semiconductors with our IP built in as well as a Wi-Fi radio for communications. By designing and selling these modules we can reduce our customers design expense, accelerate their time-to-market cycle, and reduce the cost of each module. Summit offers both a “TX” module to transmit the audio from a host device like a media hub, TV or dongle to WiSA enabled speakers and an “RX” model for speakers that receive the wireless audio signal and processes it for audio play out.

 

Modules for Consumer Products

 

Summit’s TX modules are targeted for integration into TVs, AV receivers, media hubs, small dongles and connect through USB or HDMI ports of these devices. Summit’s transmitter, with its integrated antenna, is designed to support rooms as large as ten meters by ten meters with uncompressed, 24 bit 96 kHz audio. The module supports a simple interface, with Inter-IC Sound (I2S) or USB audio and control.

 

Summit’s receiver interfaces to a digital amplifier and is designed to be integrated directly into a home theater speaker. Integrated antennas support 24 bit, 96 kHz audio anywhere within a 10 meters by 10 meters space. It supports one or two separate audio outputs via I2S. An optional interface on the receiver module can be enabled to configure the speaker type and provide volume/mute control at the speaker. Alternatively, the speaker type can be assigned at the factory for preconfigured Home Theater in a Box (HTiB) applications.

 

Summit Speaker Systems

 

There are speaker systems utilizing Summit’s technology currently in the market with a price range of $1,000 to over $80,000. We believe the technology allows brands and retailers to provide high quality systems to consumers at a multitude of price points. Further, multi-channel systems can be easily expanded, allowing a consumer to start with a basic 2.0 (stereo) or sound-bar system and expand over time.

 

The Summit Opportunity

 

We believe the following attributes: cost, mobility, video support, easy installation and quality create a market opportunity for Summit technologies to be adopted by the consumer electronics industry as described further below.

 

Cost

 

We believe the simplicity and cost structure of our upcoming embedded software solution will make our prices competitive for a wider range of applications, allowing consumer electronics companies to integrate our technology, while also delivering high quality audio.

 

Mobility

 

Mobile devices are popular for streaming video, gaming and using Virtual Reality (VR) applications. We believe this is driving a need for an embedded high fidelity wireless solution in the mobile device that can transmit audio to headsets or speakers within a room. Summit’s technology enables high quality wireless audio transmission from mobile devices.

 

Video Support

 

Wireless audio capable of supporting video has become a priority for consumers across a variety of high volume multimedia platforms, including TV’s, smartphones, game consoles and set-top boxes. Video applications require audio and video to be perfectly synchronized in order to avoid lip-sync and audio phase distortion issues. Summit’s technology prioritizes low latency and synchronization to less than one micro second, thus practically eliminating phase distortion between speakers.

 

39 

 

  

Ease of Installation

 

We believe the home theater market has moved toward simplicity in recent years. The costly and inconvenient home theaters of the past have left consumers with a desire for audio systems that provide a simplified installation process. We believe that new audio systems, including the predominant sound bar system, are unable to provide high levels of performance especially in the surround-sound market. Summit’s technology greatly simplifies the installation process of true surround-sound systems. This allows consumers to install a home theater system with the same amount of effort as a sound bar but enjoy a far superior experience. An overwhelming majority of the content entering our homes through digital TV and streaming services is provided in a multi-channel format, which is why Summit’s goal is to facilitate enjoyment of true surround sound for both the everyday consumer and audio enthusiast.

 

In addition to easy installation, Summit modules provide consumers with a multitude of options, allowing customization of a home theater specific to each consumer, without being forced to stick with one brand of speaker. For example, our hope is that a consumer might start with a Summit enabled sound bar for their television and then add a Summit enabled subwoofer. That same system can be easily upgraded to a variety of surround sound systems by simply adding more speakers. Our technology will allow consumers to upgrade an audio system or just one component of the system without the need to replace the entire system, consumers can keep the original transmitter, sound bar, and subwoofer and integrate them seamlessly into a new system. Being able to outfit a home entertainment system with Summit-enabled speakers and components gives consumers the ability to express their individual preference and needs and provides the assurance that the devices will interoperate, delivering the highest standard in HD wireless surround sound.

 

Dissatisfaction with Bluetooth Performance and Quality

 

We believe consumers want better performance and quality from their Bluetooth audio devices. For example, they may want headsets that stay connected over longer distances or products that offer better audio fidelity. By offering a solution that addresses these needs at a comparable price point to Bluetooth, we believe we can build consumer demand for our technology.

 

Electronics companies continue to make profits off of accessories

 

 

HDTVs are getting thinner and it is becoming increasingly difficult to incorporate the latest electronic advances into such thin displays. We expect that eventually most of the electronics will be external to the display. We believe the first physical feature to go will be the audio component, since there is very little room for quality speakers in today’s thin displays. We believe HDTV manufacturers know they need to provide an audio alternative. Additionally, since cost is a significant consideration, we believe some manufacturers may offer external sound bars which will satisfy some consumers, but perhaps not the consumers who desire a high-quality audio alternative. We believe these developments are creating an inflection point in the market, and manufacturers are looking to Summit’s technology to create a standard for wireless audio interoperability that will support a long-term product strategy for the successful development of high quality, wireless audio products. By designing speaker systems that incorporate Summit’s technology, consumer electronics companies will be able to sell easy-to-install surround sound audio solutions alongside televisions.

 

Consumers want to enjoy improved audio on existing content

 

We believe the growth in the number of video devices streaming multi-channel audio content coupled with new 3D immersive sound experiences from Dolby ATMOS and DTSx will help propel the demand for wireless speakers well into the future.

 

Consumers want to be able to enjoy wireless audio without interference from other wireless signals

 

Having other devices nearby that also use the 5 GHz band should not affect the performance of a Summit enabled audio system, as Summit’s technology can seamlessly switch to another frequency within the 5 GHz band. The 5 GHz U-NII spectrum utilized by Summit technology has up to 24 channels available that are constantly monitored for interference using the Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) sub-band between 5.2 and 5.8 GHz. When interference is detected, the next channel, having been monitored for over one minute and confirmed for accessibility, is ready to go and Summit enabled devices switch seamlessly to that channel, without the user ever noticing or the audio experience being affected.

 

40 

 

  

What makes Summit Unique

 

Both the proprietary technology and the adoption of the technology by leaders in consumer electronics are differentiating factors for Summit. Management believes that Summit is the only company with the capabilities of transmitting high resolution, low latency, synchronized wireless audio capable of supporting up to 8 channels. Premium consumer brands, like Bang and Olufsen, have begun to adopt our technology as a valued feature in performance products.

 

Category Defining Wireless Audio

 

Our wireless technology delivers 8 channels of uncompressed audio directly to the speakers in 24-bit and up to 96 kHz sample rates. This means that a consumer can experience audio exactly as it was mastered in the studio. Summit’s technology supports surround sound systems up to 7.1 or 5.1.2 for Dolby ATMOS configurations. There are three wireless platforms: WiSA, standard Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. Low latency is critical for home theater and gaming markets. WiSA’s latency is a fixed latency less than 10ms (milliseconds), Wi-Fi and Bluetooth have a variable latency greater than 50ms. In a multi-speaker environment, speaker synchronization is important for keeping each speaker on the same audio sound bit. WiSA keeps speakers synchronized within 5 microseconds. Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are greater than 50 microseconds. Finally, channel count is critical for multi-channel content. WiSA supports 8 channels, Bluetooth supports up to two, and standard Wi-Fi supports up to 4 channels.

 

Summit’s technology roadmap includes proprietary software, currently in development, that will support 802.11 Wi-Fi protocol. This proprietary software has been designed to scale in audio channel count and sample rates even as Wi-Fi performance or network utilization changes.

 

Summit Customers

 

Leading consumer electronics brands realize the opportunity to create wireless audio products that are simple to install and perform at high levels. Brands such as Bang and Olufsen and Klipsch have chosen Summit technology to drive their wireless home audio/theater product assortments. We believe their leadership has brought credibility to the technology and paved the way at retail for other brands to follow.

 

Our Strategy

 

Our goal is to establish and maintain a leadership position as the ubiquitous standard for hi-fidelity wireless, multi-channel audio. To obtain and enhance our position as the leading standard in the audio space, we intend to:

 

  improve recognition of our Summit brand and WiSA standard brand;

 

  provide excellent products and services to our customers and members;

 

  make sure our technology is accessible to many consumers by having our technology in consumer electronics devices that sell at a variety of price points;

 

  expand market awareness of wireless multi-channel hi-fidelity audio experience availability;

 

  reduce hardware costs while moving towards a software licensing business model;

 

  enhance and protect our intellectual property portfolio;

 

  invest in highly qualified personnel; and

 

  build innovative products alongside the world’s leading consumer electronics companies.

 

We currently sell our modules to a customer base that is primarily comprised of companies that sell their electronics in relatively small quantities. As the larger consumer electronics companies whom we are working with begin to sell new Summit enabled products, we expect that orders for our modules will increase proportionally. With larger orders, we believe that we can take advantage of economies of scale and improve our gross margins on our modules.

 

41 

 

  

Interoperability

 

Interoperability is a key aspect of wireless technology. We believe this is especially true in audio, where unique designs, price points, audio quality and capabilities as well as consumer brand loyalties are significant factors for the end consumer. Creating home theater and audio components that all work with an interoperable standard creates a high level of confidence in retailers and consumers and helps drive the entire category. Interoperability also increases the opportunity for specialized brands to create new and innovative products knowing they can focus on their specific part of the market and rely on others to create the necessary cohort components.

 

Proprietary Software

 

A significant amount of our time and resources are being allocated towards launching a software licensing part of our business. Customers will receive a license for our TX software, so that any of their devices with a suitable Wi-Fi radio can transmit audio compliant with our standard without having to purchase and integrate our TX module. We believe that this software will be well positioned for use by major consumer electronics companies in many devices including televisions, handsets, gaming consoles, and computers. Patent applications have been submitted for key technology innovations in this software.

 

Speaker companies under this new model would purchase Wi-Fi modules with our RX software pre-installed from an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”), rather than buying modules directly from us. The OEM would pay a royalty to us based on how many modules with our software that it sold.

 

Research and Development

 

As of January 30, 2018, our research and development department consisted of 23 dedicated employees. Summit’s engineering team has a wide range of expertise, capable of developing all levels of product design, from Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC) to modules to finished products. Summit research and development has and will continue developing trade secrets for Digital Signal Processing (DSP), RF design and testing of Summit technologies.

 

Summit has developed multiple ASICs and certified modules for integration into multiple designs by ODMs which are currently shipping to consumers. The hardware solution uses a high performance proprietary network for transmission of multi-channel audio.

 

Summit is currently developing a Wi-Fi compliant Software (SW) solution that will enable multi-channel audio capabilities on most Google Cast modules and Linux/Android based multimedia systems. The software solution uses a Wi-Fi compliant network for transmission of multi-channel audio. Summit has demonstrated the core SW only technology to key tier one companies and is currently working on productizing the solution for evaluation and implementation. We plan to use a portion of the proceeds of this offering to expand our research and development efforts, especially in the SW technology.

 

Manufacturing, Logistics and Fulfillment

 

Our modules are designed and developed in Oregon, and our manufacturing is outsourced to contract manufacturers located in China. Our manufacturing facilities have been ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certified. We purchase components and fabricated parts from multiple suppliers; however, we rely on sole source suppliers for certain components used to manufacture our modules. Several key strategic parts are purchased from suppliers by us and then consigned to our manufacturers, while the vast majority of parts are procured directly by our contract manufacturers. Our Operations team manages the pricing and supply of the key components of our modules and seeks to achieve competitive pricing on the largest value-add components, while leveraging our contract manufacturers’ volume purchases for best pricing on common parts. We have strong relationships with our manufacturers, helping us meet our supply and support requirements. Our manufacturing partners procure components and assemble our devices to demand forecasts we establish based upon historical trends and analysis from our sales and product management functions. We believe that our manufacturing capabilities are essential to maintaining and improving product quality and performance, and that using outsourced manufacturing enables greater scale and flexibility than establishing our own manufacturing facilities.

 

While some modules are delivered from our production facility in Oregon, we have a third-party warehouse and fulfillment center in Hong Kong that delivers the majority our modules.

 

42 

 

 

Sales Channels and Customers

 

Summit sells modules and ICs (integrated circuits) directly to OEM brands worldwide which in turn, sell their system level products to end customers through a vast channel of retailers and dealer networks. Internationally known brands such as Bang & Olufsen, Harman, LG, Onkyo Pioneer, Klipsch, Hansong, GGEC, Axiim, Enclave and many others are among our current Summit Semiconductor customers with products aimed at the wireless home theater market. Most of these brands sell thru big box retail and online e-tail including Bestbuy.com, Frys.com, Amazon.com, as well as through traditional home theater dealer channels.

 

Marketing and Advertising

 

Effective and consistent marketing and advertising is critical as we grow our wireless audio solutions. We have worked with multiple PR agencies on establishing effective messaging to face all segments within our category including press, brands, reviewers, retailers and consumers. Our focuses are ease of set-up, high quality performance, expandability and the benefits of a true multi-channel surround sound audio solutions.

 

Competition

 

The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and has been characterized by price erosion and rapid technological change. We compete with major domestic and international semiconductor companies, many of which have greater market recognition and greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution and other resources than we have with which to pursue engineering, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of their products.

 

Microchip, Inc.

 

Microchip develops, manufactures and sells specialized semiconductor products used by their customers for a wide variety of embedded control applications. One of their offerings, KleerNet, is in direct competition with our technology. Microchip markets their KleerNet technology as resistant to interference, low latency, long-range, and able to stream uncompressed audio. Summit’s technology differentiates itself from KleerNet because we do not rely on a retransmission protocol. A retransmission protocol resends audio packets that have been either damaged or lost. We believe retransmission of audio data is an inferior solution since it increases latency in congested networks and makes it difficult to synchronize audio with video. Summit transmits audio packets with fixed latency in a manner well-suited for multi-channel audio networks and video applications.

 

Avnera Corporation

 

Avnera is a fabless semiconductor firm making highly-integrated application targeted integrated circuits (ICs) for consumer audio and voice applications. Avnera IC’s integrate RF, power management, audio data converters, host interfaces, & programmable DSPs onto low-cost CMOS, enabling very high performance at low total system cost. Avnera IC products target applications in PC accessory audio, iPod accessory audio, home theater, and consumer & enterprise voice. Avnera’s list of customers includes Logitech, Creative, Rocketfish, Panasonic, iHome, Vizio, Sanyo, Onkyo, Acoustic Research, Audioengine, and Polycom.

 

Bluetooth SIG, Inc.

 

Bluetooth is a globally recognized technology that has applications to wireless audio. We believe Bluetooth technology currently cannot match the technical capabilities of our modules. However, Bluetooth is still a very inexpensive and widely used technology for wireless audio. We believe our technological advantages over Bluetooth include our ability to do surround sound, more reliable connection, higher fidelity, fixed low latency, tight speaker to speaker synchronization, and uncompressed audio.

 

In addition to these companies that compete with our custom chip and module business, we believe that Blackfire Research Corporation would be a competitor for our upcoming software IP business segment.

 

43 

 

 

Intellectual Property

 

We have key intellectual property (“IP”) assets, including patents and trade secrets developed based on our technical expertise. As of January 30, 2018, we had 8 issued patents and 2 pending patent applications in the United States and one application outside the United States. The patents cover several areas of a multi-channel system. Our currently issued patents expire at various times from December 31, 2029 through February 21, 2034.

 

Intellectual property is an important aspect of our business, and our practice is to seek protection for our intellectual property as appropriate. A multi-channel audio for surround sound system has technical requirements not required by simple stereo only systems. Multi-channel systems require each audio channel to be precisely played in time to create a sound field that correlates to video being viewed by a consumer. Summit has developed hardware and software core technologies that manage system network latency and speaker phase. Summit’s patents are based on protecting our low latency network algorithms and multi receiver synchronization.

 

We pursue a general practice of filing patent applications for our technologies in the U.S. and foreign countries where our customers manufacture, distribute, or sell licensed products. We actively pursue new applications to expand our patent portfolio to address new technological innovations. We have multiple patents covering aspects and improvements for many of our technologies.

 

Our trademarks cover our various products, technologies, improvements, and features, as well as the services that we provide. These trademarks are an integral part of our technology licensing program, and licensees typically elect to place our trademarks on their products to inform consumers that their products incorporate our technology and meet our quality specifications.

 

We protect our IP rights both domestically and internationally. From time to time, we may experience problems with OEMs of consumer entertainment products in emerging economies. We have taken steps in the past to enforce our IP rights and expect to do so in the future.

 

Moreover, we have relatively few or no issued patents in certain countries. For example, in China, Taiwan, and India, we have only limited patent protection for our technologies. Consequently, we may realize less revenue for technologies from those regions in the future. Maintaining or growing our licensing revenue in developing countries such as China, Taiwan, and India will depend in part, on our ability to obtain patent rights in these countries, which is uncertain. Further, because of the limitations of the legal systems in many countries, the effectiveness of patents obtained or that may in the future be obtained, if any, is uncertain.

 

Employees

 

As of January 30, 2018, we had a total 34 employees working in the United States and internationally. In the United States, we had 32 employees, including 22 in research and development, two in sales and marketing, five in manufacturing/logistics/fulfillment and three in general and administrative. Additionally, we had one sales employee in Japan and one logistics employee in Taiwan. None of our employees are currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we have experienced no work stoppages. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

 

44 

 

 

Facilities

 

Our executive and finance office is located in San Jose, California where we lease approximately 1,500 square feet for approximately $1,500 per month on a month to month basis. Our research and development, production, sales and marketing personnel occupy office space in Beaverton, Oregon, where we lease approximately 17,500 square feet for approximately $28,500 per month pursuant to a lease that expires in October 2018.

 

We lease our facilities and do not own any real property. We may procure additional space as we add employees and expand geographically. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the immediate future and that should it be needed, suitable additional space will be available to accommodate expansion of our operations.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

At the present time, we are not involved in any material litigation. However, from time to time we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business.

 

45 

 

 

MANAGEMENT

 

Executive Officers, Other Executive Management and Directors

 

Our executive officers and directors and their respective ages and positions as of January 30, 2018 are as follows:

 

Name    Age    Positions
Executive Officers        
Brett Moyer   59   President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Gary Williams   51   Chief Financial Officer. Secretary, VP of Finance
         
Non-Employee Directors        
Michael A. Fazio   56   Director
Jonathan Gazdak   45   Director (2)(3)
Dr. Jeffrey M. Gilbert   46   Director (1)(2)
Helge Kristensen   57   Director (1)(3)
Sam Runco   69   Director (1)(2)(3)

 

(1) Member of the audit committee.
(2) Member of the compensation committee.
(3) Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

 

Executive Officers

 

Brett Moyer, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director and Chairman. Brett Moyer is a founding member of the Company and has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as a member of its board of directors since August 2010. From August 2002 to July 2010, Mr. Moyer served as president and chief executive officer of Focus Enhancements, Inc., a developer and marketer of proprietary video technology. From February 1986 to May 1997, Mr. Moyer worked at Zenith Electronics Inc. a consumer electronic company, where he had most recently been the vice president and general manager of its Commercial Products Division. Since June 2016, Mr. Moyer has also served as a member of the board of directors of Alliant International University, a private university offering graduate study in psychology, education, business management, law and forensic studies, and bachelor’s degree programs in several fields. From 2003 to December 2015, he served on the board of directors of HotChalk, Inc., a developer of software for the educational market, and from March 2007 to September 2008, he was a member of the board of directors of NeoMagic Corporation, a developer of semiconductor chips and software that enable multimedia applications for handheld devices. Mr. Moyer received a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Beloit College in Wisconsin and a Master’s of Business Administration with a concentration in finance and accounting from Thunderbird School of Global Management.

 

Gary Williams, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Vice President of Finance. Gary Williams has served as Secretary, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer since the Company’s founding in August 2010. In addition, Mr. Williams served as the Chief Financial Officer of Quantum3D, Inc., a training and simulation technology company, from November 2012 to September 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Williams served as secretary, vice president of finance and chief financial officer of Focus Enhancements Inc., a developer and marketer of proprietary video technology, from January 2001 to July 2010, when the videography and semiconductor businesses of the company were purchased by VITEC Multimedia, Inc. and the Company, respectively. Mr. Williams served as controller, vice president of finance, chief financial officer and secretary of Videonics Inc., a publicly traded company in the consumer electronics business, from February 1995 to January 2001, when Videonics merged with Focus Enhancements, Inc. From July 1994 to January 1995, Mr. Williams served as controller for Western Micro Technology, a publicly traded company in the electronics distribution business. From January 1990 to June 1994, Mr. Williams worked in public accounting for Coopers & Lybrand LLP. Mr. Williams is a Certified Public Accountant and received a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration, with an emphasis in Accounting, from San Diego State University.

 

46

 

 

Non-Employee Directors

 

Michael A. Fazio. Michael A. Fazio has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since May 2017. Since its inception in August 2012, Michael A. Fazio has served as the chairman of MARCorp Financial LLC, a private equity firm located in Illinois. Mr. Fazio was granted a seat on the Company’s board of directors pursuant to a securities purchase agreement, dated as of May 17, 2017, between the Company and MARCorp Signal, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of MARCorp Financial LLC, pursuant to which the Company issued MARCorp Signal, LLC a $5,882,353 senior secured original issue discount convertible note and a warrant to purchase 19,607,843 of our common units. Previously, from 2003 to December 2016, Mr. Fazio held various senior management roles at Houlihan Lokey, a global investment banking firm, most recently serving as managing director and co-head of the European Financial Institutions Group. Mr. Fazio also served as president, chief operating officer and chief executive officer of Europe at Comdisco, Inc. a multibillion equipment leasing company, from 2001 to 2002. Prior to Comdisco, Inc. from 1999 to 2000, Mr. Fazio served as executive vice president and chief operating officer of Deutsche Bank of the Americas, a global banking and financial services company, and from 1983 to 1999, he was employed at Arthur Andersen and served in various leadership roles there, including as Partner in Charge of the Financial Institutions Industry program in New York. The Company believes that Mr. Fazio is qualified to serve on its board of directors because of his over 30 years of experience in advisory services in connection with acquisitions, divestitures, corporate strategy, operational oversight and restructurings. Mr. Fazio received a joint BBA/MBA, with honors, in accounting from Pace University.

 

Jonathan Gazdak. Jonathan Gazdak has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since June 2015. Mr. Gazdak has served as managing director and the head of investment banking at Alexander Capital LP, an investment banking firm based in New York, since April 2014, concentrating in the technology, digital media, media and entertainment industries, as well as specialty finance vehicles. He has worked on a broad range of transactions, including public equity and debt financings, restructurings, mergers and acquisitions and special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) transactions. Prior to Alexander Capital LP, Mr. Gazdak served as head of the technology group at Aegis Capital Corp., a mid-sized broker-dealer firm, from November 2011 to April 2014. While at Aegis Capital Corp., he helped complete over 40 public and private financings and merger and acquisition transactions. Prior to Aegis Capital Corp., from June 2009 to October 20011, Mr. Gazdak worked in the media and entertainment group at Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., an investment banking and financial services firm. Prior to his career in investment banking, Mr. Gazdak was an entrepreneur who owned and managed an international IT consulting and services firm for 10 years, selling it in 2005. From May 1996 to May 2006, Mr. Gazdak was a national board member and regional president of the TechServe Alliance, which promotes the growth of hundreds of IT-related business around the nation. Mr. Gazdak received his MBA from Columbia Business School with Beta Gamma Sigma honors and received a degree with honors in mechanical engineering from the University of Florida. The Company believes that Mr. Gazdak is qualified to serve on its board of directors because based on his deep experience as an entrepreneur as well as his broad experience in the finance and technology industries.

 

Dr. Jeffrey M. Gilbert. Dr. Jeff Gilbert has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since April 2015. Dr. Gilbert has been working in the Research and Machine Intelligence and Project Loon teams at Google, Inc. since March 2014, and from January 2014 to March 2014, Dr. Gilbert worked for Transformational Technology Insights LLC, a consulting company, where he served as the sole principal. Previously, from May 2011 to December 2013, Dr. Gilbert was chief technology officer of Silicon Image, Inc., a leading provider of wired and wireless connectivity solutions. Dr. Gilbert was responsible for Silicon Image Inc.’s technology vision, advanced technology, and standards initiatives. Prior to joining Silicon Image Inc., Dr. Gilbert was chief technology officer of SiBEAM Inc., a fabless semiconductor company pioneering the development of intelligent millimeter wave silicon solutions for wireless communications, from May 2005 to May 2011 Before SiBEAM Inc., Dr. Gilbert served as director of algorithms and architecture and other engineering and management positions at Atheros Communications, a semiconductor developer, from May 2000 to May 2005, where he led the development of that company’s 802.11n, 802.11g, eXtended Range (XR), and Smart Antenna technologies. Dr. Gilbert received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of California Berkeley, an M.Phil. in Computer Speech and Language Processing from Cambridge University, and a B.A. in Computer Science from Harvard College. The Company believes that Dr. Gilbert is qualified to serve on its board of directors to advise the company on technology developments and management based on his long-standing experience in the wireless and technology industries.

 

47

 

 

Helge Kristensen. Helge Kristensen has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since August 2010. Mr. Kristensen has held high level management positions in technology companies for the last 25 years and for the last 18 years, he has served as vice president of Hansong Technology, an original device manufacturer of audio products based in China, and as president of Platin Gate Technology (Nanjing) Co. Ltd, a company with focus on service-branding in lifestyle products as well as pro line products based in China. Since August 2015, Mr. Kristensen has served as co-founder and director of Inizio Capital, an investment company based in the Cayman Islands. Mr. Kristensen has been involved in the audio and technology industries for more than 25 years. His expertise is centered on understanding and applying new and innovative technologies. He holds a master’s degree in Engineering and an HD-R, a graduate diploma, in Business Administration (Financial and Management Accounting) from Alborg University in Denmark. The Company believes that Mr. Kristensen is qualified to serve on its board of directors because of his technology and managerial experience as well has his knowledge of the audio industry.

 

Sam Runco. Sam Runco has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since its inception. Mr. Runco co-founded Runco International, Inc. in 1987 and served as its chief executive officer until 2007. He also served as a director of Focus Enhancements Inc. from August 2004 to September 2008 and a director of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) and CEA’s video division from 1996 to 2005. In addition, he played a leadership role in the consumer electronics industry as a member of numerous organizations and associations. From 1997 through 2001, Mr. Runco served as a member of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (Emmy) Technical/Engineering Awards Nominating Committee, the Academy of Digital Television Pioneers. He served as member of the Board of Directors/Governors from 1998 through 2000 and again from 2003 through 2005, then as a member of the Board of Industry Leaders of the CEA from 2006 to 2008.  He also served as a member of Board of Governors of the Electronic Industries Alliance from 1998 through 2000, and as a member of the Board of the Academy for the Advancement of High End Audio and Video. Mr. Runco is the recipient of the Consumer Electronic Design and Installation Association peer-selected Lifetime Achievement Award and elected to Dealerscope magazine’s Hall of Fame. The Sound & Visionary from S&V Magazine selected him as one of the 10 Most Influential Leaders in the custom installation industry by CE Pro magazine. He was number 1 on the Most Influential Leader list in the custom installation audio/video industry, which was voted on by his peers six years after Mr. Runco sold Runco International, Inc. The Company believes that Mr. Runco is qualified to serve on its board of directors due to his solid reputation with the audio video dealer network and his ability to understand consumer desires and provide guidance on product development. The Company believes that his industry experience, including his knowledge base on dealers and their consumers, will be an excellent resource for the Company.

  

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

In August 2008, Focus Enhancements Inc., (“Focus”) a Nasdaq-traded company of which Mr. Moyer and Mr. Williams had been serving as chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, filed for Chapter 11 (reorganization), under the bankruptcy code, due to an inability to raise sufficient financing during the financial crisis of 2007-2008. Mr. Moyer and Mr. Williams remained with Focus as its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively, through Focus’ reorganization and ultimate sale of its business segments over the following two years.

 

In 2015, Quantum3D, Inc., (“Quantum3D”) a company of which Mr. Williams had been serving as chief financial officer, as a result of his prior experience in corporate restructuring, was placed into an assignment for the benefit of creditors. Mr. Williams continued to serve as chief financial officer during Quantum3D’s restructuring and negotiated sale in September 2016.

 

Other than the foregoing, no officer, director, or persons nominated for such positions, promoter or significant employee of the Company has been involved in the last ten years in any of the following:

 

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

having any government agency, administrative agency, or administrative court impose an administrative finding, order, decree, or sanction against them as a result of their involvement in any type of business, securities, or banking activity;

being the subject of a pending administrative proceeding related to their involvement in any type of business, securities, or banking activity; or

having any administrative proceeding been threatened against you related to their involvement in any type of business, securities, or banking activity.

  

48

 

 

Board Composition

 

Our board of directors may establish the authorized number of directors from time to time by resolution and currently consists of six members. Each director serves until the expiration of the term for which such director was elected or appointed, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the next annual meeting following election.

 

Director Independence

 

Upon the completion of this offering, we anticipate that our common stock will be listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market. Under the listing requirements and rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, independent directors must compose a majority of a listed company’s board of directors within 12 months after its initial public offering. In addition, the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market require that, subject to specified exceptions and phase in periods following its initial public offering, each member of a listed company’s audit and compensation committees be independent. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Rule 10A-3. Under the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. 

 

To be considered to be independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his capacity as a member of our audit committee, our board of directors, or any other committee of our board of directors: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

 

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors has determined that all members of our board of directors except Mr. Brett Moyer and Mr. Michael Fazio do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each non-employee director. Our board of directors has also determined that Messrs. Gilbert, Kristensen, and Runco satisfy the independence standards for the audit committee established by the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market and Rule 10A-3. Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Gazdak, Gilbert, and Runco satisfy the independence standards for the compensation committee established by the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, are “independent directors” for committee purposes (as determined under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market). Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Fazio does not satisfy the independence standards for the established by the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market and Rule 10A-3 as a result of his role as the chairman of MARCorp Financial LLC, the parent of MARCorp Signal, LLC. 

 

Board Committees 

 

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. Our board of directors may establish other committees to facilitate the management of our business. The composition and functions of each committee are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors. 

 

Audit Committee

 

Our audit committee consists of three directors, Messrs. Gilbert, Kristensen and Runco. Our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Gilbert, Kristensen and Runco satisfies the independence requirements for audit committee members under the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Each member of our audit committee meets the financial literacy requirements of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. Kristensen is the chairman of the audit committee and our board of directors has determined that Mr. Kristensen is an audit committee “financial expert” as defined by Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee include, among other things:

 

selecting a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;

 

helping to ensure the independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;

 

discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, our interim and year-end operating results;

 

developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or audit matters;

 

reviewing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;

 

reviewing related party transactions;

 

obtaining and reviewing a report by the independent registered public accounting firm at least annually, that describes our internal control procedures, any material weaknesses with such procedures, and any steps taken to deal with such material weaknesses when required by applicable law; and

  

49

 

 

approving (or, as permitted, pre-approving) all audit and all permissible non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Our audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. 

 

Compensation Committee

 

Our compensation committee consists of three directors, Messrs. Gazdak, Gilbert and Runco. Our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Gazdak, Gilbert and Runco satisfies the independence requirements for compensation committee members under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, is a non-employee director as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and is an independent director as determined under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Mr. Gazdak is the chairman of the compensation committee. The composition of our compensation committee meets the requirements for independence under current listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market and current SEC rules and regulations. The principal duties and responsibilities of our compensation committee include, among other things:

 

reviewing and approving, or recommending that our board of directors approve, the compensation of our executive officers;

 

reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation of our directors;

 

reviewing and approving, or recommending that our board of directors approve, the terms of compensatory arrangements with our executive officers;

 

administering our stock and equity incentive plans;

 

reviewing and approving, or recommending that our board of directors approve, incentive compensation and equity plans; and

 

reviewing and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees and reviewing our overall compensation philosophy.

 

Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. 

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of three directors, Messrs. Gazdak, Kristensen and Runco. Our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Gazdak, Kristensen and Runco is an independent director under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. Kristensen is the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

identifying, evaluating and selecting, or recommending that our board of directors approve, nominees for election to our board of directors and its committees;

 

evaluating the performance of our board of directors and of individual directors;

 

considering and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition of our board of directors and its committees;

 

reviewing developments in corporate governance practices;

 

evaluating the adequacy of our corporate governance practices and reporting;

  

50

 

 

developing and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters; and

 

overseeing an annual evaluation of the board’s performance.

 

Our nominating and corporate committee operates under a written charter. 

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

 

In connection with this offering, we plan to adopt a code of business conduct and ethics that will apply to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. Upon completion of this offering, our code of business conduct and ethics will be available on our website at http://www.summitwireless.com/. The information contained in or accessible through the foregoing website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and is intended for informational purposes only. We intend to disclose any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, on our website to the extent required by the applicable rules and exchange requirements. The inclusion of our website address in this prospectus does not include or incorporate by reference into this prospectus the information on or accessible through our website.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation  

 

None of the members of the compensation committee is currently or has been at any time one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.

 

Non-Employee Director Compensation  

 

Our directors were not compensated nor granted any equity incentive for their services in 2016.

  

51

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation awarded to or earned by the executive officers listed below during the year ended December 31, 2016. As an emerging growth company, we have opted to comply with the reduced executive compensation disclosure rules applicable to “smaller reporting companies,” as such term is defined in the rules promulgated under the Securities Act, which require compensation disclosure for only our principal executive officer and the two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer. Throughout this prospectus, these two officers are referred to as our “named executive officers.”

 

Name and Principal Position  Year   Salary ($)   Bonus ($)   Warrant
Awards ($)(1) 
   Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)   All Other Compensation ($)   Total ($) 
Brett Moyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
  2016   $200,976       $36,664           $237,640 
Gary Williams
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and VP of Finance
  2016   $175,677       $24,297           $199,974 

 

(1) Amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our named executive officers. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of each warrant to purchase share of common stock accordance with FASB ASC 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our named executive officers will only realize compensation to the extent the trading price of our common stock is greater than the exercise price of such warrant to purchase common stock.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2016

 

The following table provides information regarding each unexercised warrants to purchase common stock held by our named executive officers:

 

    As of December 31, 2016  
    Warrants     Average  
Name   Outstanding     Exercise Price  
Brett Moyer     788,428     $ 0.33  
Gary Williams     61,666     $ 0.30  

 

Executive Employment Agreements and Arrangements

 

Brett Moyer is party to an employment contract which we assumed on or about August 1, 2010, which was amended in 2011. Pursuant to this employment contract, Mr. Moyer serves as our Chief Executive Officer and President at an annual salary of $335,000 as of December 31, 2016. This employment contract provides for payment of 12 months of salary and accelerated vesting of all options held by Mr. Moyer so as to be immediately exercisable if Mr. Moyer is terminated “without cause,” as defined in the employment contract. Additionally, in the event Mr. Moyer’s contract is not renewed, Mr. Moyer shall receive 12 months of his then current salary. The employment contract provides for incentive bonuses as determined by our Board of Directors, and employee benefits, including health and disability insurance, in accordance with our policies. Mr. Moyer’s employment contract with us automatically renews for successive one-year terms, unless terminated by either party 30 days prior to the end of the then current term. 

 

52

 

 

Gary Williams is party to an employment contract which we assumed on or about August 1, 2010, which was amended in 2011. Pursuant to this employment contract, Mr. Williams serves as our Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer at an annual salary of $222,000 as of December 31, 2016. Mr. Williams’ contract automatically renews for a one-year term unless terminated by either party 90 days prior to the end of the then current term. This employment contract provides for payment of 12 months of salary, payment of prorated bonus amounts if Mr. Williams is terminated either “without cause” or in the event of a “change in control,” as defined in the employment contract during the term of the contract. Mr. Williams’ employment contract with us provides for bonuses, as determined by our Board of Directors, and employee benefits, including health and disability insurance, in accordance with our policies.

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plans

 

On January 30, 2018, the Company’s board of directors approved the establishment of our 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) subject to stockholder ratification and approval. The LTIP is intended to enable the Company to continue to attract able directors, employees, and consultants and to provide a means whereby those individuals upon whom the responsibilities rest for successful administration and management of the Company, and whose present and potential contributions are of importance, can acquire and maintain Common Stock ownership, thereby strengthening their concern for the Company’s welfare.  The aggregate maximum number of shares of Common Stock (including shares underlying options) that may be issued under the LTIP pursuant to awards of Restricted Shares or Options will be limited to 15% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, which calculation shall be made on the first (1st) business day of each new fiscal year; provided that for fiscal year 2018, upon approval of the LTIP by our shareholders, up to 300,000 shares of Common Stock will initially be available for participants under the LTIP. Thereafter, the 15% evergreen provision shall govern the LTIP. The number of shares of Common Stock that are the subject of awards under the LTIP which are forfeited or terminated, are settled in cash in lieu of shares of Common Stock or in a manner such that all or some of the shares covered by an award are not issued to a participant or are exchanged for awards that do not involve shares will again immediately become available to be issued pursuant to awards granted under the LTIP. If shares of Common Stock are withheld from payment of an award to satisfy tax obligations with respect to the award, those shares of Common Stock will be treated as shares that have been issued under the LTIP and will not again be available for issuance under the LTIP.

 

On January 30, 2018, the Company terminated the Company’s Carve-Out Plan (the “Carve-Out Plan”) (described in Note 8 of our consolidated financial statements). Prior to its cancellation, our employees, consultants, and directors of the Company were entitled to participate in the Carve-Out Plan at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. Each Carve-Out Plan participant was awarded points which entitled that participant to a portion of the proceeds payable to the Company and/or its members upon a sale of the Company. The proceeds payable to a Carve-Out Plan participant were equal an amount determined in accordance with the following formula: (number of points held by participant /total points outstanding)*18% of Net Sale Price. For this purpose, “Net Sale Price” equaled the aggregate amount payable to the Company and/or its members in connection with a sale of the Company less all amounts payable to creditors of the Company. In connection with the termination of the Carve-Out Plan, the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of an aggregate of 1,437,596 shares of common stock to the participants that had vested in the Carve-Out Plan, subject to stockholder ratification and approval. 

 

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters

 

Our certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the liability of our current and former directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

 

●          any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;

 

●          any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

 

●          unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or

 

●          any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

 

This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

 

53

 

 

Our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws to be in effect upon the completion of this offering, or our bylaws, will provide that we are required to indemnify our directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our bylaws will also provide that, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, we are required to advance expenses incurred by a director in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under the provisions of Delaware law. Our bylaws will also provide our board of directors with discretion to indemnify our officers and employees when determined appropriate by our board of directors. We have entered and expect to continue to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers and other employees as determined by the board of directors. With certain exceptions, these agreements provide for indemnification for related expenses including, among other things, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any action or proceeding. We believe that these provisions and agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain customary directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

 

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as required by these indemnification provisions. At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification. 

 

Rule 10b5-1 Sales Plans

 

Our directors and executive officers may adopt written plans, known as Rule 10b5-1 plans, in which they will contract with a broker to buy or sell shares of common stock on a periodic basis. Under a Rule 10b5-1 plan, a broker executes trades pursuant to parameters established by the director or executive officer when entering into the plan, without further direction from such director or executive officer once such director or executive officer’s plan is in place. The director or executive officer may amend a Rule 10b5-1 plan in some circumstances and may terminate a plan at any time. Our directors and executive officers also may buy or sell additional shares outside of a Rule 10b5-1 plan when they are not in possession of material nonpublic information subject to compliance with the terms of our insider trading policy. Prior to 180 days after the date of this offering, subject to early termination, the sale of any common stock under such plan would be subject to the lock-up agreement that the director or executive officer has entered into with the underwriter.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS 

 

Other than compensation arrangements for our directors and executive officers, the following is a summary of transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 to which we have been a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any of our then directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of any class of our stock at the time of such transaction, or any members of their immediate family, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

 

Brett Moyer

 

Mr. Moyer has served as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and a board member since the Company’s founding in August 2010.

 

In February 2015, Mr. Moyer participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing by investing $197,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, Mr. Moyer’s Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $208,032. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, Mr. Moyer’s convertible note was extinguished and converted into 866,800 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price.

 

54

 

 

In 2016, Mr. Moyer loaned the Company $185,704 via the issuance of various notes described in Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements as the Moyer 2016 Notes ($135,704) and as one of the participants in the Five February 2016 Notes ($50,000). In July 2016, Mr. Moyer participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $87,000 by extinguishing $87,000 of reimbursable expenses. In connection with this preferred unit financing, Mr. Moyer’s $87,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 290,000 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, Mr. Moyer’s 866,801 common units, immediately outstanding prior to his participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 866,801 preferred units. In December 2016, Mr. Moyer extinguished the Moyer 2016 Notes, his portion of the Five February 2016 Note and $69,290 of reimbursable expense reports, and invested the aggregate sum of $269,091 in the Series D Convertible Notes financing. As of September 30, 2017, Mr. Moyer was owed $269,091 of principal under convertible promissory notes.

 

Michael Fazio

 

Mr. Fazio is the chairman of MARCorp Financial LLC, a private equity firm located in Illinois. Mr. Fazio has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since May 2017. On May 17, 2017, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with MARCorp Signal, LLC, pursuant to which the Company could borrow a total of $5,000,000. MARCorp Signal, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MARCorp Financial LLC. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had borrowed $4,375,000 and issued a $5,147,059 Series E Convertible Note to MARCorp Signal, LLC. In connection with such borrowings, MARCorp Signal, LLC was also issued a warrant to purchase 17,156,863 common units, which warrant was exercisable at $0.30 per unit and had a five-year life. As of September 30, 2017, MARCorp Signal, LLC was owed $5,147,059 of principal under convertible promissory notes.

   

Jonathan Gazdak

 

Mr. Gazdak works as Managing Director – Head of Investment Banking for Alexander Capital, L.P. an investment banking firm based in New York. Mr. Gazdak has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since June 2015. Alexander Capital has acted as the lead investment bank in a number of the Company’s private financings.

 

In February 2015, Mr. Gazdak participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing by investing $25,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, Mr. Gazdak’s Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $26,133. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, Mr. Gazdak’s Series B Convertible Note was extinguished and converted into 108,889 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price. In June 2015, Mr. Gazdak participated in the Company’s common unit financing by investing $50,000. In connection with this common unit financing, Mr. Gazdak’s $50,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 166,667 common units.

 

In 2017, Mr. Gazdak participated in the Company’s Series D Convertible Notes financing by extinguishing $12,000 of reimbursable expenses. As of September 30, 2017, Mr. Gazdak was owed $14,118 of principal under convertible promissory notes.

 

Additionally, Alexander Capital, L.P. is acting as an underwriter in this offering, and as such, is receiving underwriter discounts and commissions.

 

The Company has signed an engagement letter with Alexander Capital under which Alexander Capital earns a fee on total investments by their clients. Alexander Capital has earned fees of $248,175, $359,311 and 504,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition, as of September 30, 2017, Alexander Capital had been issued a total of 4,494,106 common unit warrants that are exercisable at $0.36 per unit and have a five-year life.

 

Helge Kristensen

 

Mr. Kristensen has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2010. Mr. Kristensen is a managing member of Inizio Capital, an investment company based in China and Hansong Technology LTD, an original device manufacture of audio products based in China.

 

55

 

 

In February 2015, Inizio Capital participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing by investing $300,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, Inizio Capital’s Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $314,800. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, Inizio Capital’s Series B Convertible Note was extinguished and converted into 1,311,667 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price. In December 2015, Hansong Technology loaned the Company $353,475 under a promissory note (See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the December 2015 Note). As of December 31, 2015, affiliates of Mr. Kristensen were owed $353,475 of principal under promissory notes.

 

In February 2016, Inizio Capital invested $50,000 as one the participants in the Five February 2016 Notes (see Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements). In April of 2016, the Company shipped finished inventory valued at $75,750 to Hansong Technology, which the parties agreed would be a principal reduction payment of the December 2015 Note. In May 2016, Inizio Capital participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $131,696. In connection with this preferred unit financing, Inizio Capital’s $131,696 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 438,987 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, Inizio Capital’s 1,311,667 common units, immediately outstanding prior to its participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 1,311,667 preferred units.

 

In 2017, the Company shipped additional finished inventory valued at $277,725 to Hansong Technology, in further reduction of the December 2015 Note. As of September 30, 2017, affiliates of Mr. Kristensen were owed $50,000 of principal under convertible promissory notes.

 

Significant Stockholders

 

As of December 31, 2014, Carl E. Berg owned 90% of the outstanding units of the Company and was owed $775,000 under a promissory note (see Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the December 2014 Advance).

 

In 2015, Mr. Berg participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing in the amount of $1,490,800 by investing $475,000 in February 2015, $240,800 in August 2015 and by including his December 2014 Advance of $775,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, Mr. Berg’s Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $1,564,332. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, Mr. Berg’s convertible notes were extinguished and converted into 6,518,049 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price. Additionally, in 2015, the significant unitholder loaned the Company $650,000 in two tranches identified in Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements as the April 2015 Note ($450,000) and the September 2015 Note ($250,000). As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Berg was owed $650,000 of principal under promissory notes.

 

In 2016, Mr. Berg loaned the Company an additional $600,000 in two tranches identified in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements as the February 2016 Note ($300,000) and the May 2016 Advance ($300,000). In July 2016, Mr. Berg participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $500,878 by investing an additional $200,878 in July 2016 and including his May 2016 Advance of $300,000. In connection with this preferred unit financing, Mr. Berg’s $500,878 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 1,669,595 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, Mr. Berg’s 15,468,049 common units, immediately outstanding prior to his participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 15,468,049 preferred units. As of September 30, 2017, Mr. Berg was owed $1,303,000 of principal under convertible promissory notes.

 

Lisa Walsh, a client of Alexander Capital began investing in the Company in 2015. In 2015, Ms. Walsh participated in the Company’s common unit financing by investing a total of $3,000,000. In connection with this common unit financing, Ms. Walsh’s $3,000,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 10,000,000 common units.

 

In July 2016, Ms. Walsh participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $500,000. In connection with this preferred unit financing, Ms. Walsh’s $500,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 1,666,667 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, Ms. Walsh’s 10,000,000 common units, immediately outstanding prior to her participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 10,000,000 preferred units. In November 2016, Ms. Walsh invested $500,000 in the Series D Convertible Note financing.

 

56

 

 

In July 2017, Ms. Walsh invested an additional $360,000 in the Series D Convertible Note financing. As of September 30, 2017, Ms. Walsh was owed $1,012,000 of principal under convertible promissory notes.

 

Employment Arrangements and Separation Agreements

 

We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers. For more information regarding these agreements with our named executive officers, see “Executive Compensation—Employment Arrangements.”

 

Outstanding Equity Grants to Directors and Executive Officers

 

We have granted warrants and restricted shares to our certain of our directors and executive officers. For more information regarding the stock options and stock awards granted to our directors and named executive officers see “Executive and Director Compensation.”

 

Indemnification Agreements

 

We plan to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers in connection with this offering. The indemnification agreements and our operating agreement, as amended, require us to indemnify our directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. For more information regarding these agreements, see “Executive and Director Compensation—Limitations on Liability and Indemnification Matters.”

 

Related Person Transaction Policy

 

Prior to this offering, we have not had a formal policy regarding approval of transactions with related parties. Prior to the completion of this offering, we expect to adopt a related person transaction policy that sets forth our procedures for the identification, review, consideration and approval or ratification of related person transactions. The policy will become effective immediately upon the execution of the underwriting agreement for this offering. For purposes of our policy only, a related person transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which we and any related person are, were or will be participants in which the amount involves exceeds $100,000. Transactions involving compensation for services provided to us as an employee or director are not covered by this policy. A related person is any executive officer, director or beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, including any of their immediate family members and any entity owned or controlled by such persons.

 

Under the policy we are implementing, if a transaction has been identified as a related person transaction, including any transaction that was not a related person transaction when originally consummated or any transaction that was not initially identified as a related person transaction prior to consummation, our management must present information regarding the related person transaction to our audit committee, or, if audit committee approval would be inappropriate, to another independent body of our board of directors, for review, consideration and approval or ratification. The presentation must include a description of, among other things, the material facts, the interests, direct and indirect, of the related persons, the benefits to us of the transaction and whether the transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to or from, as the case may be, an unrelated third party or to or from employees generally. Under the policy, we will collect information that we deem reasonably necessary from each director, executive officer and, to the extent feasible, significant stockholders to enable us to identify any existing or potential related-person transactions and to effectuate the terms of the policy.

 

In addition, under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which we intend to adopt in connection with this offering, our employees and directors have an affirmative responsibility to disclose any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest.

 

57

 

 

In considering related person transactions, our audit committee, or other independent body of our board of directors, will take into account the relevant available facts and circumstances including, but not limited to:

 

  the risks, costs and benefits to us;

 

  the impact on a director’s independence in the event that the related person is a director, immediate family member of a director or an entity with which a director is affiliated;

 

  the availability of other sources for comparable services or products; and

 

  the terms available to or from, as the case may be, unrelated third parties or to or from employees generally.

 

The policy requires that, in determining whether to approve, ratify or reject a related person transaction, our audit committee, or other independent body of our board of directors, must consider, in light of known circumstances, whether the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, our best interests and those of stockholders, as our audit committee or other independent body of our board of directors, determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion.

 

All of the transactions described above were entered into prior to the adoption of the written policy, but all were approved by our board of directors considering similar factors to those described above.

 

58

 

 

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

 

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 30, 2018, as adjusted to reflect the sale of shares of common stock offered by us in this offering, for:

 

  each person, or group of affiliated persons, who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;

 

  each of our named executive officers;

 

  each of our directors; and

 

  all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

 

The percentage ownership information shown in the table prior to this offering is based upon 7,826,527 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 30, 2018, after giving effect to both (i) the conversion of all outstanding convertible promissory notes into an aggregate of 4,739,125 shares of common stock and (ii) the conversion of all outstanding preferred stock into an aggregate of 2,762,594 shares of common stock. The percentage ownership information shown in the table after this offering is based upon shares outstanding, assuming the sale of ___________ shares of common stock by us in the offering but excludes all warrants outstanding or issuable in connection with this offering.

 

Except as otherwise noted below, the address for persons listed in the table is c/o Summit Semiconductor 6840 Via Del Oro, Ste. 280, San Jose, CA 95119.

 

59

 

 

    Number of shares                 Number of shares    
    beneficially owned     % of Total           beneficially owned    
    before this offering     Voting           after this offering   % of Total
    Common     Power     Number     Common   Voting
                Before     Of Shares               Power After
    Shares     %     Offering     Offered     Shares   %     Offering
5% or greater stockholders                                                
Carl E. Berg (3)     1,551,440       11.5 %     11.5 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
Lisa Walsh (4)     3,317,910       24.6 %     24.6 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
MARCorp Signal, LLC (5)     2,614,379       19.4 %     19.4 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
                                                 
Directors & executive officers (1)(2)                                                
Brett Moyer (6)     200,033       1.5 %     1.5 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
Helge Kristensen (7)     161,666       1.2 %     1.2 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
Jonathan Gazdak (8)     140,095       1.0 %     1.0 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
Dr. Jeffrey M. Gilbert (9)           0.0 %     0.0 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
Michael A. Fazio (10)           0.0 %     0.0 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
Sam Runco (11)           0.0 %     0.0 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
Gary Williams (12)     11,267       0.1 %     0.1 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
All executive officers and directors as a group (7 persons)     513,060       3.8 %     3.8 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]
                                                 
5% or greater, directors and executive officers as a group     7,996,789       59.3 %     59.3 %          [_____]      [_____]       [_____]

 

 

 

(1) Includes 204,638 warrants that are fully vested and are exercisable at prices of $4.50 – 5.40 per share.

(2) Does not include 552,300 shares of restricted common stock that was issued in satisfaction of the termination of the Carve-Out Plan, which will be released to recipients in three equal tranches at September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019, and September 1, 2019.

(3) Includes fully vested warrants to purchase 72,549 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.40 per share.

(4) Includes fully vested warrants to purchase 834,641 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.40 per share.

(5) Includes fully vested warrants to purchase 2,614,379 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. Excluded are 487,864 additional warrants that MARCorp Signal believes it is due as a result of default penalties and interest due on the Series E Convertible Notes the Company repaid on November 30, 2017.

(6) Includes fully vested warrants to purchase 52,562 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $4.50 to $5.40 per share. Excludes 270,023 shares of restricted common stock which will be released in three equal tranches on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019.

(7) Includes fully vested warrants to purchase 22,222 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. Excludes 25,000 shares of restricted common stock which will be released in three equal tranches on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019.

(8) Includes fully vested warrants to purchase 118,587 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.40 per share. Excludes 25,000 shares of restricted common stock which will be released in three equal tranches on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019.

(9) Excludes 25,000 shares of restricted common stock which will be released in three equal tranches on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019.

(10) Excludes 7,292 shares of restricted common stock which will be released in three equal tranches on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019.

(11) Excludes 25,000 shares of restricted common stock which will be released in three equal tranches on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019.

(12) Includes fully vested warrants to purchase 11,267 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging from $4.50 to $5.40 per share. Excludes 174,986 shares of restricted common stock which will be released in three equal tranches on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019.

 

60

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK

 

The following description of our common stock, certain provisions of our bylaws and certain provisions of Delaware law are summaries. You should also refer to our bylaws, which are filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is part.

 

General 

 

Our board of directors may establish the rights and preferences of the preferred stock from time to time. As of January 30, 2018, after giving effect to the conversion of all outstanding convertible promissory notes and the conversion of all outstanding preferred stock into common stock in connection with the completion of the offering, there would have been an aggregate of 7,826,527 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, held of record by 85 stockholders.

 

Common Stock

 

Voting Rights

 

Upon the completion of this offering, each holder of our common stock will be entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors. Under our bylaws, our stockholders will not have cumulative voting rights. Because of this, the holders of a majority of the common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors will be able elect all of the directors standing for election, if they should so choose. 

 

Dividends

 

Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any then-outstanding preferred stock, holders of common stock will be entitled to receive ratably those dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors out of legally available funds.

 

Liquidation

 

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of common stock will be entitled to share ratably in the net assets legally available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all of our debts and other liabilities and the satisfaction of any liquidation preference granted to the holders of any then-outstanding preferred stock.

 

Rights and Preferences

 

Holders of common stock have no preemptive, conversion or subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock that we may designate in the future.

 

Preferred Stock 

 

All currently outstanding preferred stock will be converted to common stock upon the completion of this offering.

 

Following the completion of this offering, our board of directors will have the authority, without further action by our stockholders, to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereon, and to increase or decrease the number of shares any such series, but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding.

 

61

 

 

Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock. The purpose of authorizing our board of directors to issue preferred stock and determine its rights and preferences is to eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on specific issuances. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any preferred stock on the rights of holders of common stock until the board of directors determines the specific rights attached to that class of preferred stock.

 

We have no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock. However, in the event that we issue preferred stock after the date of the offering, the investors in this offering will be diluted.

 

Warrants

 

As of January 30, 2018, warrants for the purchase of shares of common stock outstanding were 5,667,485 of which 5,563,379 were immediately exercisable while an additional 104,106, issued to employees, would be exercisable in the event of a change of control of the Company.

 

Registration Rights 

 

Certain investors in our company (“Initiating Holders”) have registration rights which, upon notice from an Initiating Holder, will require us to file a registration statement to register the shares owned by said Initiating Holder. The Company must also provide notice to all other Initiating Holders and register the shares of any other Initiating Holder that joins such request. However, an Initiating Holder cannot submit a notice prior to the earlier of five years from the date such holder executed a Registration Rights Agreement or one hundred eighty days following the effective date of the first registration statement filed by the Company covering an underwritten offering of its securities.

 

Anti-Takeover Provisions

 

Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

 

Anti-Takeover Statute

 

We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years after the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, with the following exceptions:

 

●           before such date, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;

 

●           upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction began, excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock outstanding, but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested stockholder, those shares owned (1) by persons who are directors and also officers and (2) employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or

 

●           on or after such date, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2⁄3% of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.

 

In general, Section 203 defines a “business combination” to include the following:

 

●           any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder;

 

62

 

 

●           any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more of the assets of the corporation involving the interested stockholder;

 

●           subject to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder;

 

●           any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the stock or any class or series of the corporation beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or

 

●           the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits by or through the corporation.

 

In general, Section 203 defines an “interested stockholder” as an entity or person who, together with the person’s affiliates and associates, beneficially owns, or within three years prior to the time of determination of interested stockholder status did own, 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation.

 

Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to be in Effect Upon the Completion of this Offering

 

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws will provide that directors may be removed by the stockholders only for cause upon the vote of a majority of our outstanding common stock. Furthermore, the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors, and vacancies and newly created directorships on the board of directors may, except as otherwise required by law or determined by the board, only be filled by a majority vote of the directors then serving on the board, even though less than a quorum.

 

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws will also provide that all stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called meeting of stockholders and will eliminate the right of stockholders to act by written consent without a meeting. Our bylaws will also provide that only our chairman of the board, chief executive officer or the board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors may call a special meeting of stockholders.

 

Our bylaws will also provide that stockholders seeking to present proposals before our annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at a meeting of stockholders must provide timely advance notice in writing, and, subject to applicable law, will specify requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder’s notice.

 

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws will provide that the stockholders cannot amend many of the provisions described above except by a vote of a majority of our outstanding common stock.

 

The combination of these provisions will make it more difficult for our existing stockholders to replace our board of directors as well as for another party to obtain control of us by replacing our board of directors. Since our board of directors has the power to retain and discharge our officers, these provisions could also make it more difficult for existing stockholders or another party to effect a change in management. In addition, the authorization of undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change our control.

 

These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continued stability in the composition of our board of directors and its policies and to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to reduce our vulnerability to hostile takeovers and to discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights. However, such provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares and may have the effect of delaying changes in our control or management. As a consequence, these provisions may also inhibit fluctuations in the market price of our stock that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts. We believe that the benefits of these provisions, including increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure our company, outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging takeover proposals, because negotiation of takeover proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

 

63

 

 

Choice of Forum

 

Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for: (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (ii) any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law; (iv) any action regarding our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws; or (v) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the “internal affairs doctrine” as that term is defined in Section 115 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Our certificate of incorporation further provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.  Therefore, any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders.

 

Transfer Agent and Registrar

 

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is ____________.

 

Listing

 

We will apply for listing of our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the trading symbol “WISA.”

 

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE 

 

Prior to this offering, no public market existed for our common stock, and although we expect that our common stock will be approved for listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market, we cannot assure investors that there will be an active public market for our common stock following this offering. We cannot predict what effect, if any, sales of our shares of common stock in the public market or the availability of shares for sale will have on the market price of our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of shares of common stock in the public market, including shares issued upon exercise of outstanding options or warrants, or the perception that such sales may occur, however, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and also could adversely affect our future ability to raise capital through the sale of our common stock or other equity-related securities at times and prices we believe appropriate.

 

Based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of _______, 2018, upon completion of this offering,                shares of common stock will be outstanding, assuming no exercise of the underwriter’s warrants and no exercise of outstanding options or warrants.

 

All of the shares of common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act, except for any share sold to our “affiliates,” as that term is defined under Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The remaining ____________ outstanding shares of common stock held by existing stockholders are “restricted securities,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if the offer and sale is registered under the Securities Act or if the offer and sale of those securities qualifies for exemption from registration, including exemptions provided by Rules 144 and 701 promulgated under the Securities Act.

 

As a result of lock-up agreements and market standoff provisions described below and the provisions of Rules 144 and 701, the restricted securities will be available for sale in the public market as follows:

 

● no shares will be eligible for immediate sale upon the completion of this offering; and  

● approximately ___________ shares will be eligible for sale upon expiration of lock-up agreements and market standoff provisions described below, beginning 181 days after the date of this prospectus, subject in certain circumstances to the volume, manner of sale and other limitations under Rule 144 and Rule 701.

 

64

 

 

We may issue shares of common stock from time to time for a variety of corporate purposes, including in capital-raising activities through future public offerings or private placements, in connection with exercise of options and warrants, vesting of restricted shares and other issuances relating to our employee benefit plans and as consideration for future acquisitions, investments or other purposes. The number of shares of common stock that we may issue may be significant, depending on the events surrounding such issuances. In some cases, the shares we issue may be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act; in other cases, we may grant registration rights covering the shares issued in connection with these issuances, in which case the holders of the shares of common stock will have the right, under certain circumstances, to cause us to register any resale of such shares to the public.

 

Lock-Up Agreements

 

In connection with this offering, we, our directors and officers and holders of more than 5% of our equity securities outstanding immediately prior to this offering, have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to offer, sell or transfer any shares of common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock for 180 days after the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Alexander Capital, L.P.

 

In addition to the restrictions contained in the lock-up agreements described above, we have entered into agreements with certain of our security holders, including our investors’ rights agreement and agreements governing our equity awards, that contain market stand-off provisions imposing restrictions on the ability of such security holders to offer, sell or transfer our equity securities for a period of 180 days following the date of this prospectus.

 

Registration Rights

 

Upon the completion of this offering, the holders of _____ shares of our common stock, or their transferees, will be entitled to specified rights with respect to the registration of the offer and sale of their shares under the Securities Act. Registration of the offer and sale of these shares under the Securities Act would result in the shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration. See “Description of Capital Stock—Registration Rights” for additional information.

 

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX AND ESTATE TAX CONSIDERATIONS

 

FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS

 

The following is a general discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to non-U.S. holders (as defined herein) with respect to their ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock issued pursuant to this offering. All prospective non-U.S. holders of our common stock should consult their tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock. In general, a non-U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of our common stock (other than a partnership or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

●           an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

 

●           a corporation, or an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

●           an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

 

65

 

 

●           a trust if (1) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of the trust’s substantial decisions or (2) the trust has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

 

This discussion is based on current provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, existing U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, published administrative pronouncements and rulings of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, and judicial decisions, all as in effect as of the date of this prospectus. These authorities are subject to change and to differing interpretation, possibly with retroactive effect. Any change or differing interpretation could alter the tax consequences to non-U.S. holders described in this prospectus.

 

We assume in this discussion that a non-U.S. holder holds shares of our common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, for investment). This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to a particular non-U.S. holder in light of that non-U.S. holder’s individual circumstances, nor does it address any alternative minimum, Medicare contribution, estate or gift tax consequences, or any aspects of U.S. state, local or non-U.S. taxes. This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may apply to a non-U.S. holder and does not address the special tax rules applicable to particular non-U.S. holders, such as holders that own, or are deemed to own, more than 5% of our capital stock (except to the extent specifically set forth below), corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, tax-exempt organizations, banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax-qualified retirement plans, holders who hold or receive our common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, holders holding our common stock as part of a hedge, straddle or other risk reduction strategy, conversion transaction or other integrated investment, holders deemed to sell our common stock under the constructive sale provisions of the Code, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies and certain former U.S. citizens or long-term residents.

 

In addition, this discussion does not address the tax treatment of partnerships (or entities or arrangements that are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes) or persons that hold their common stock through such partnerships. If a partnership, including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holds shares of our common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such partners and partnerships should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock.

 

There can be no assurance that a court or the IRS will not challenge one or more of the tax consequences described herein, and we have not obtained, nor do we intend to obtain, a ruling with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a non-U.S. holder of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common stock.

 

Distributions on Our Common Stock

 

Distributions, if any, on our common stock generally will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. If a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated as a tax-free return of the non-U.S. holder’s investment, up to such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as capital gain from the sale or exchange of such common stock, subject to the tax treatment described below in “Gain on Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common Stock.” Any such distribution will also be subject to the discussion below under the heading “Foreign Accounts.”

 

Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder will generally be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty between the United States and such holder’s country of residence.

 

66

 

 

Dividends that are treated as effectively connected with a trade or business conducted by a non-U.S. holder within the United States and, if an applicable income tax treaty so provides, that are attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base maintained by the non-U.S. holder within the United States, are generally exempt from the 30% withholding tax if the non-U.S. holder satisfies applicable certification and disclosure requirements. However, such U.S. effectively connected income, net of specified deductions and credits, is taxed at the same graduated U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to U.S. persons (as defined in the Code). Any U.S. effectively connected income received by a non-U.S. holder that is a corporation may also, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty between the United States and such holder’s country of residence.

 

To claim a reduction or exemption from withholding, a non-U.S. holder of our common stock generally will be required to provide (a) a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or successor form) and satisfy applicable certification and other requirements to claim the benefit of an applicable income tax treaty between the United States and such holder’s country of residence, or (b) a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI stating that dividends are not subject to withholding because they are effectively connected with such non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Non-U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding their entitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty.

 

A non-U.S. holder that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax under an income tax treaty may obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.

 

Gain on Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common Stock

 

Subject to the discussion below regarding backup withholding and foreign accounts, in general, a non-U.S. holder will not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon such holder’s sale, exchange or other disposition of shares of our common stock unless:

 

●           the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. holder and, if an applicable income tax treaty so provides, is attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base maintained in the United States by such non-U.S. holder, in which case the non-U.S. holder generally will be taxed at the graduated U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to U.S. persons (as defined in the Code) and, if the non-U.S. holder is a foreign corporation, the branch profits tax described above in “Distributions on Our Common Stock” also may apply;

 

●           the non-U.S. holder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition and certain other conditions are met, in which case the non-U.S. holder will be subject to a 30% tax (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty) on the net gain derived from the disposition, which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses of the non-U.S. holder, if any (even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States); or

 

●           our common stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest because we are, or have been, at any time during the five-year period preceding such disposition (or the non-U.S. holder’s holding period, if shorter) a “U.S. real property holding corporation.” Generally, a corporation is a U.S. real property holding corporation only if the fair market value of its U.S. real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property interests plus its other assets used or held for use in a trade or business. Although there can be no assurance, we do not believe that we are, or have been, a U.S. real property holding corporation, or that we are likely to become one in the future. Even if we are or become a U.S. real property holding corporation, provided that our common stock is regularly traded, as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations, on an established securities market, our common stock will be treated as a U.S. real property interest only with respect to a non-U.S. holder that holds more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, directly or indirectly, actually or constructively, during the shorter of the 5-year period ending on the date of the disposition or the period that the non-U.S. holder held our common stock. In such case, such non-U.S. holder generally will be taxed on its net gain derived from the disposition at the graduated U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to U.S. persons (as defined in the Code). No assurance can be provided that our common stock will continue to be regularly traded on an established securities market for purposes of the rules described above.

 

67

 

 

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

We must report annually to the IRS and to each non-U.S. holder the gross amount of the dividends on our common stock paid to such holder and the tax withheld, if any, with respect to such dividends. Non-U.S. holders will have to comply with specific certification procedures to establish that the holder is not a U.S. person (as defined in the Code) in order to avoid backup withholding at the applicable rate with respect to dividends on our common stock. A non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. backup withholding with respect to payments of dividends on our common stock if it certifies its non-U.S. status by providing a valid IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or successor form) or W-8ECI, or otherwise establishes an exemption; provided we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know such non-U.S. holder is a U.S. person, as defined in the Code. Dividends paid to non-U.S. holders subject to the U.S. withholding tax, as described above in “Distributions on Our Common Stock,” generally will be exempt from U.S. backup withholding.

 

Information reporting and backup withholding will generally apply to the proceeds of a disposition of our common stock by a non-U.S. holder effected by or through the U.S. office of any broker, U.S. or foreign, unless the holder certifies its status as a non-U.S. holder and satisfies certain other requirements, or otherwise establishes an exemption. Generally, information reporting and backup withholding will not apply to a payment of disposition proceeds to a non-U.S. holder where the transaction is effected outside the United States through a non-U.S. office of a broker. However, for information reporting purposes, dispositions effected through a non-U.S. office of a broker with substantial U.S. ownership or operations generally will be treated in a manner similar to dispositions effected through a U.S. office of a broker. Non-U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to them.

 

Copies of information returns may be made available to the tax authorities of the country in which the non-U.S. holder resides or is incorporated under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement.

 

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a non-U.S. holder may be allowed as a credit against the non-U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

 

Foreign Accounts

 

The Code generally imposes a U.S. federal withholding tax of 30% on dividends and the gross proceeds of a disposition of our common stock paid to a “foreign financial institution” (as specifically defined for this purpose), unless such institution enters into an agreement with the U.S. government to, among other things, withhold on certain payments and to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities substantial information regarding U.S. account holders of such institution (which includes certain equity and debt holders of such institution, as well as certain account holders that are foreign entities with U.S. owners) or otherwise qualifies for an exemption from these rules. A U.S. federal withholding tax of 30% also applies to dividends and will apply to the gross proceeds of a disposition of our common stock paid to a non-financial foreign entity (as defined in the Code), unless such entity provides the withholding agent with either a certification that it does not have any substantial direct or indirect U.S. owners or provides information regarding substantial direct and indirect U.S. owners of the entity, or otherwise qualifies for an exemption from these rules. The withholding provisions described above currently apply to dividends paid on our common stock and will generally apply with respect to gross proceeds of a sale or other disposition of our common stock on or after January 1, 2019.

 

Under certain circumstances, a non-U.S. holder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes. An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and an applicable foreign country may modify the requirements described in this paragraph.

 

EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR SHOULD CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE PARTICULAR U.S. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING, HOLDING AND DISPOSING OF OUR COMMON STOCK, INCLUDING THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY PROPOSED CHANGE IN APPLICABLE LAWS.

 

68

 

 

UNDERWRITING

 

We have entered into an underwriting agreement with Alexander Capital, L.P. (“underwriter”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the underwriter, and the underwriter has agreed to purchase from us, shares of our common stock on a best efforts basis. We plan to list our common stock for trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “WISA.”

 

Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the underwriter and the underwriter has agreed to purchase from us, shares of common stock on a best efforts basis:

 

The obligations of the underwriter may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the underwriting agreement. Furthermore, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the underwriter’s obligations are subject to customary conditions, representations and warranties contained in the underwriting agreement, such as receipt by the underwriter of officers’ certificates and legal opinions and no material adverse change to our business.

 

The underwriter is offering the shares of common stock, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by their counsel and other conditions specified in the underwriting agreement. The underwriter reserves the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject orders in whole or in part.

 

Discounts, Commissions and Expenses

 

The following table shows the public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions payable to the underwriter by us in connection with this offering, and proceeds to us, before expenses:

 

    Per Share     Total  
             
Public offering price   $     $  
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid to us   $     $  
Proceeds to us, before expenses   $     $  

 

We have agreed to reimburse the underwriter for certain out-of-pocket expenses of the underwriter payable by us, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $ [_____]. The underwriting agreement, however, provides that in the event this offering is terminated, the underwriter will only be entitled to the reimbursement of out-of-pocket accountable expenses actually incurred in accordance with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(D).

 

The underwriter proposes to offer the shares of common stock purchased pursuant to the underwriting agreement to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to certain dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $ ____per share. After this offering, the public offering price and concession may be changed by the underwriter. No such change shall change the amount of proceeds to be received by us as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

 

We estimate that the total expenses of the offering payable by us, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $ __________.

 

Indemnification

 

We have agreed to indemnify the underwriter against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or to contribute to payments the underwriter or such other indemnified parties may be required to make in respect thereof.

 

Underwriter’s Warrant

 

We have agreed to issue to the underwriter warrants initially exercisable for up to______ shares of common stock. The warrants are not included in the securities being sold in this offering. The shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are identical to those offered by this prospectus. The warrants are exercisable at a per share price equal to 120% of the price per share in this offering. The warrants will be exercisable at any time, and from time to time, in whole or in part, during the five-year period commencing one year from the effective date of this offering, which period shall not extend further than five years from the effective date of this offering in compliance with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(G)(i). The warrants and the common stock underlying the warrants have been deemed compensation by FINRA and are therefore subject to a 180-day lock-up pursuant to Rule 5110(g)(1) of FINRA. The underwriter (or permitted assignees under Rule 5100(g)(1)) will not sell, transfer, assign, pledge or hypothecate the warrants or the securities underlying the warrants, nor will they engage in any hedging, short sale, derivative, put, or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of the warrants or the underlying securities for a period of 180 days from the date of effectiveness of the registration statement. The exercise price and number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances, including in the event of a stock distribution, extraordinary cash distribution or our recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation.

 

 69

 

Lock-Up Agreements

 

We have agreed not to (i) offer, pledge, issue, sell, contract to sell, purchase, contract to purchase, lend or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock; (ii) enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of shares of common stock; or (iii) file any registration statement with the SEC relating to the offering of any of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our common stock, without the prior written consent of the underwriter for a period of 90 days following the date of this prospectus, subject to an 18-day extension under certain circumstances (the “Lock-up Period”). This consent may be given at any time without public notice. These restrictions on future issuances are subject to exceptions for (i) the issuance of shares of our common stock sold in this offering, (ii) the issuance of shares of common stock upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and the vesting of restricted stock awards, and (iii) the issuance of employee warrants to purchase common stock not exercisable during the Lock-up Period and the grant, redemption or forfeiture of restricted stock awards or restricted stock issued pursuant to our equity incentive plans.

 

In addition, each of our directors, executive officers, and majority of our existing stockholders have entered into a lock-up agreement with the underwriter. Under the lock-up agreements, the directors and executive officers may not, directly or indirectly, sell, offer to sell, contract to sell, or grant any option for the sale (including any short sale), grant any security interest in, pledge, hypothecate, hedge, establish an open “put equivalent position” (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1(h) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act), or otherwise dispose of, or enter into any transaction which is designed to or could be expected to result in the disposition of, any of shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, or publicly announce any intention to do any of the foregoing, without the prior written consent of the underwriter, for a period of 180 days from the closing date of this offering, subject to an 18-day extension under certain circumstances. This consent may be given at any time without public notice. These restrictions on future dispositions by our directors and executive officers are subject to exceptions for (i) one or more bona fide gift transfers of securities to immediate family members who agree to be bound by these restrictions and (ii) transfers of securities to one or more trusts for bona fide estate planning purposes, amongst others.

 

Passive Market Making

 

In connection with this offering, the underwriter and selling group members may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market (should our common stock be listed on NASDAQ) in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act, during a period before the commencement of offers or sales of the shares and extending through the completion of the distribution. A passive market maker must display its bid at a price not in excess of the highest independent bid of that security. However, if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market maker’s bid, then that bid must then be lowered when specified purchase limits are exceeded.

 

 70

 

Other Relationships

 

Certain of the underwriter and their affiliates have provided, and may in the future provide, various investment banking, commercial banking and other financial services for us and our affiliates for which they have received, and may in the future receive, customary fees. However, except as disclosed in this prospectus, we have no present arrangements with the underwriter for any further services.

 

Offer restrictions outside the United States

 

Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us or the underwriter that would permit a public offering of the securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The securities offered by this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale of any such securities be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful.

 

Australia

 

This prospectus is not a disclosure document under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act, has not been lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and does not purport to include the information required of a disclosure document under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act. Accordingly, (i) the offer of the securities under this prospectus is only made to persons to whom it is lawful to offer the securities without disclosure under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act under one or more exemptions set out in section 708 of the Australian Corporations Act, (ii) this prospectus is made available in Australia only to those persons as set forth in clause (i) above, and (iii) the offeree must be sent a notice stating in substance that by accepting this offer, the offeree represents that the offeree is such a person as set forth in clause (i) above, and, unless permitted under the Australian Corporations Act, agrees not to sell or offer for sale within Australia any of the securities sold to the offeree within 12 months after its transfer for the offeree under this prospectus.

 

China

 

The information in this document does not constitute a public offer of the securities, whether by way of sale or subscription, in the People’s Republic of China (excluding, for purposes of this paragraph, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region and Taiwan). The securities may not be offered or sold directly or indirectly in the PRC to legal or natural persons other than directly to “qualified domestic institutional investors.”

 

European Economic Area

 

The information in this document has been prepared on the basis that all offers of securities will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Directive 2003/71/EC (“Prospectus Directive”), as implemented in Member States of the European Economic Area (each, a “Relevant Member State”), from the requirement to produce a prospectus for offers of securities.

 

An offer to the public of securities has not been made, and may not be made, in a Relevant Member State except pursuant to one of the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive as implemented in that Relevant Member State:

 

  to legal entities that are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;

 

  to any legal entity that has two or more of (i) an average of at least 250 employees during its last fiscal year; (ii) a total balance sheet of more than €43,000,000 (as shown on its last annual unconsolidated or consolidated financial statements) and (iii) an annual net turnover of more than €50,000,000 (as shown on its last annual unconsolidated or consolidated financial statements);

 

  to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive) subject to obtaining the prior consent of the Company or any underwriter for any such offer; or

 

 71

 

  in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, provided that no such offer of securities shall result in a requirement for the publication by the Company of a prospectus pursuant.

 

France

 

This document is not being distributed in the context of a public offering of financial securities (offre au public de titres financiers) in France within the meaning of Article L.411-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code (Code monétaire et financier) and Articles 211-1 et seq. of the General Regulation of the French Autorité des marchés financiers (“AMF”). The securities have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in France.

 

This document and any other offering material relating to the securities have not been, and will not be, submitted to the AMF for approval in France and, accordingly, may not be distributed or caused to distributed, directly or indirectly, to the public in France.

 

Such offers, sales and distributions have been and shall only be made in France to (i) qualified investors (investisseurs qualifiés) acting for their own account, as defined in and in accordance with Articles L.411-2-II-2° and D.411-1 to D.411-3, D.744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and any implementing regulation and/or (ii) a restricted number of non-qualified investors (cercle restreint d’investisseurs) acting for their own account, as defined in and in accordance with Articles L.411-2-II-2° and D.411-4, D.744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and any implementing regulation.

 

Pursuant to Article 211-3 of the General Regulation of the AMF, investors in France are informed that the securities cannot be distributed (directly or indirectly) to the public by the investors otherwise than in accordance with Articles L.411-1, L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 to L.621-8-3 of the French Monetary and Financial Code.

 

Ireland

 

The information in this document does not constitute a prospectus under any Irish laws or regulations and this document has not been filed with or approved by any Irish regulatory authority as the information has not been prepared in the context of a public offering of securities in Ireland within the meaning of the Irish Prospectus (Directive 2003/71/EC) Regulations 2005 (the “Prospectus Regulations”). The securities have not been offered or sold, and will not be offered, sold or delivered directly or indirectly in Ireland by way of a public offering, except to (i) qualified investors as defined in Regulation 2(l) of the Prospectus Regulations and (ii) fewer than 100 natural or legal persons who are not qualified investors.

 

Israel

 

The securities offered by this prospectus have not been approved or disapproved by the Israeli Securities Authority, or the ISA, nor have such securities been registered for sale in Israel. The shares may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in Israel, absent the publication of a prospectus. The ISA has not issued permits, approvals or licenses in connection with the offering or publishing the prospectus; nor has it authenticated the details included herein, confirmed their reliability or completeness, or rendered an opinion as to the quality of the securities being offered. Any resale in Israel, directly or indirectly, to the public of the securities offered by this prospectus is subject to restrictions on transferability and must be effected only in compliance with the Israeli securities laws and regulations.

 

Italy

 

The offering of the securities in the Republic of Italy has not been authorized by the Italian Securities and Exchange Commission (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa, “CONSOB”, pursuant to the Italian securities legislation and, accordingly, no offering material relating to the securities may be distributed in Italy and such securities may not be offered or sold in Italy in a public offer within the meaning of Article 1.1(t) of Legislative Decree No. 58 of 24 February 1998 (“Decree No. 58”), other than:

 

  to Italian qualified investors, as defined in Article 100 of Decree no. 58 by reference to Article 34-ter of CONSOB Regulation no. 11971 of 14 May 1999 (“Regulation no. 1197l”) as amended (“Qualified Investors”); and

 

  in other circumstances that are exempt from the rules on public offer pursuant to Article 100 of Decree No. 58 and Article 34-ter of Regulation No. 11971 as amended.

 

 72

 

Any offer, sale or delivery of the securities or distribution of any offer document relating to the securities in Italy (excluding placements where a Qualified Investor solicits an offer from the issuer) under the paragraphs above must be:

 

  made by investment firms, banks or financial intermediaries permitted to conduct such activities in Italy in accordance with Legislative Decree No. 385 of 1 September 1993 (as amended), Decree No. 58, CONSOB Regulation No. 16190 of 29 October 2007 and any other applicable laws; and

 

  in compliance with all relevant Italian securities, tax and exchange controls and any other applicable laws.

 

Any subsequent distribution of the securities in Italy must be made in compliance with the public offer and prospectus requirement rules provided under Decree No. 58 and the Regulation No. 11971 as amended, unless an exception from those rules applies. Failure to comply with such rules may result in the sale of such securities being declared null and void and in the liability of the entity transferring the securities for any damages suffered by the investors.

 

Japan

 

The securities have not been and will not be registered under Article 4, paragraph 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25 of 1948), as amended (the “FIEL”) pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements applicable to a private placement of securities to Qualified Institutional Investors (as defined in and in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3 of the FIEL and the regulations promulgated thereunder). Accordingly, the securities may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan other than Qualified Institutional Investors. Any Qualified Institutional Investor who acquires securities may not resell them to any person in Japan that is not a Qualified Institutional Investor, and acquisition by any such person of securities is conditional upon the execution of an agreement to that effect.

 

Portugal

 

This document is not being distributed in the context of a public offer of financial securities (oferta pública de valores mobiliários) in Portugal, within the meaning of Article 109 of the Portuguese Securities Code (Código dos Valores Mobiliários). The securities have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in Portugal. This document and any other offering material relating to the securities have not been, and will not be, submitted to the Portuguese Securities Market Commission (Comissã do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários) for approval in Portugal and, accordingly, may not be distributed or caused to distributed, directly or indirectly, to the public in Portugal, other than under circumstances that are deemed not to qualify as a public offer under the Portuguese Securities Code. Such offers, sales and distributions of securities in Portugal are limited to persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Portuguese Securities Code). Only such investors may receive this document and they may not distribute it or the information contained in it to any other person.

 

Sweden

 

This document has not been, and will not be, registered with or approved by Finansinspektionen (the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority). Accordingly, this document may not be made available, nor may the securities be offered for sale in Sweden, other than under circumstances that are deemed not to require a prospectus under the Swedish Financial Instruments Trading Act (1991:980) (Sw. lag (1991:980) om handel med finansiella instrument). Any offering of securities in Sweden is limited to persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Financial Instruments Trading Act). Only such investors may receive this document and they may not distribute it or the information contained in it to any other person.

 

Switzerland

 

The securities may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering material relating to the securities may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

 

 73

 

Neither this document nor any other offering material relating to the securities have been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of securities will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority.

 

This document is personal to the recipient only and not for general circulation in Switzerland.

 

United Arab Emirates

 

Neither this document nor the securities have been approved, disapproved or passed on in any way by the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or any other governmental authority in the United Arab Emirates, nor has the Company received authorization or licensing from the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or any other governmental authority in the United Arab Emirates to market or sell the securities within the United Arab Emirates. This document does not constitute and may not be used for the purpose of an offer or invitation. No services relating to the securities, including the receipt of applications and/or the allotment or redemption of such shares, may be rendered within the United Arab Emirates by the Company.

 

No offer or invitation to subscribe for securities is valid or permitted in the Dubai International Financial Centre.

 

United Kingdom

 

This prospectus is not an approved prospectus for purposes of the UK Prospectus Rules, as implemented under the EU Prospectus Directive 2003/71/EC, and has not been approved under section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended)(the “FSMA”) by a person authorized under FSMA. The financial promotions contained in this prospectus are directed at, and this prospectus is only being distributed to: (1) persons who receive this prospectus outside of the United Kingdom; and (2) persons in the United Kingdom who fall within the exemptions under articles 19 (investment professionals) and 49(2)(a) to (d) (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (all such persons together being referred to as “Relevant Person(s)”). This prospectus must not be acted upon or relied upon by any person who is not a Relevant Person. Any investment or investment activity to which this prospectus relates is available only to Relevant Persons and will be engaged in only with Relevant Persons. This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other person that is not a Relevant Person.

 

The underwriter has represented, warranted and agreed that:

 

  they have only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the FSMA in connection with the issue or sale of any of the shares of common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the issuer; and

 

  they have complied with and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by them in relation to the shares of common stock in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.

  

 74

 

LEGAL MATTERS

 

Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. of New York, New York will pass upon the validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby. The underwriter is being represented by Carmel, Milazzo & DiChiara in connection with the offering.

 

EXPERTS

 

The consolidated financial statements of Summit Semiconductor, LLC, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report (which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements) of BPM LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock being offered by this prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information in the registration statement and its exhibits. For further information with respect to us and the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus, we refer you to the registration statement and its exhibits. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or any other document referred to are not necessarily complete, and in each instance, we refer you to the copy of the contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement.

 

You can read our SEC filings, including the registration statement, over the internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file with the SEC at its public reference facilities at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of these documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facilities.

 

Upon completion of this offering, we will be subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and we will file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information will be available for inspection and copying at the public reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. We also maintain a website at www.summitwireless.com, at which you may access these materials free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. However, the information contained in or accessible through our website is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and investors should not rely on such information in making a decision to purchase our common stock in this offering.

 

 75

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC and Subsidiaries

 

 

 

I n d e x    t o    f i n a n c i a l    S t a t e m e n t s

 

 

Years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015    
     
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   F-2
Consolidated Financial Statements    
Consolidated Balance Sheets   F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations   F-4
Consolidated Statements Comprehensive Loss   F-5
Consolidated Statements of Members’ Deficit   F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows   F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements   F-8
     
Nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016    
     
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):    
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets   F-32
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations   F-33
Condensed Consolidated Statements Comprehensive Loss   F-34
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows   F-35
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements   F-36

 

F-1

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

The Board of Directors and Members of

Summit Semiconductor, LLC

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Summit Semiconductor, LLC, and subsidiaries (a Delaware corporation) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, preferred units and members’ deficit and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor have we been engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Summit Semiconductor, LLC, and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses and negative cash flow from operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ BPM LLP

San Jose, California

October 31, 2017

 

F-2

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

    2016     2015  
Assets                
Current Assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 92,262     $ 25,438  
Accounts receivable, net     7,089       38,318  
Inventories     585,961       574,372  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     101,517       145,451  
Total current assets     786,829       783,579  
                 
Property and equipment, net     58,264       204,417  
Other assets     97,546       83,579  
Total assets   $ 942,639     $ 1,071,575  
Liabilities, Preferred Units and Members’ Deficit                
Current Liabilities:                
Accounts payable   $ 1,034,699     $ 996,844  
Accrued liabilities     2,091,352       892,413  
Accrued interest     362,756       63,561  
  Promissory notes     120,583       1,782,533  
  Convertible notes payable     3,734,517        
Total current liabilities     7,343,907       3,735,351  
                 
Warrant liability     1,619,287        
Total liabilities     8,963,194       3,735,351  
                 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)                
Preferred units, no par value, 41,438,818 and no units authorized and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively (liquidation preference of $12,432,000 as of December 31, 2016)     64,734,841        
Members’ Deficit:                
Common units, no par value, 5,122,221 and 39,089,467 units authorized and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively     9,913,210       70,295,815  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (37,396 )     (36,650 )
Accumulated deficit     (82,631,210 )     (72,922,941 )
Total members’ deficit     (72,755,396 )     (2,663,776 )
                 
Total liabilities, preferred units and members’ deficit   $ 942,639     $ 1,071,575  

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-3

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

   2016   2015 
         
Revenue, net  $1,273,113   $2,111,995 
Cost of revenue   1,533,790    2,206,751 
Gross profit   (260,677)   (94,756)
           
Operating Expenses:          
Research and development   5,218,958    5,748,282 
Sales and marketing   2,049,265    2,168,383 
General and administrative   967,690    809,205 
Total operating expenses   8,235,913    8,725,870 
           
Loss from operations   (8,496,590)   (8,820,626)
Interest expense   (1,863,746)   (392,284)
Change in fair value of warrant liability   568,103     
Other income (expense), net   93,399    125,727 
Loss before provision for income taxes   (9,698,834)   (9,087,183)
Provision for income taxes   9,435    9,922 
Net loss  $(9,708,269)  $(9,097,105)
Net loss per common unit - basic and diluted  $(0.49)  $(0.40)
Weighted average number of common units used in computing net loss per common unit   19,785,238    22,604,551 

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

   2016   2015 
         
Net loss  $(9,708,269)  $(9,097,105)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:          
Foreign currency translation adjustment   (746)   (12,336)
Comprehensive loss  $(9,709,015)  $(9,109,441)

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-5

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Consolidated Statements Of Preferred Units and Members’ Deficit

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

                   Accumulated Other       Total 
   Preferred Units   Common Units   Comprehensive   Accumulated   Members’ 
   Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount   Loss   Deficit   Deficit 
                             
Balance as of December 31, 2014      $    10,000,000   $62,759,843   $(24,314)  $(63,825,836)  $(1,090,307)
Proceeds from issuance of common units, net of issuance costs           16,666,666    4,554,500            4,554,500 
Issuance of common units upon conversion of notes payable           12,422,801    2,981,472            2,981,472 
Currency translation adjustment                   (12,336)       (12,336)
Net loss                       (9,097,105)   (9,097,105)
Balance as of December 31, 2015           39,089,467    70,295,815    (36,650)   (72,922,941)   (2,663,776)
Proceeds from issuance of common units, net of issuance costs             800,000    219,750            219,750 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred units, net of issuance costs   5,381,572    1,501,058                     
Issuance of preferred units upon conversion of notes payable   1,290,000    387,000                     
Conversion of common units to preferred in connection with financing   34,767,246    62,846,783    (34,767,246)   (62,846,783)           (62,846,783)
Compensation expense for issuance of employee warrants               615,548            615,548 
Beneficial conversion feature upon issuance of convertible notes               809,909            809,909 
Issuance of warrants for common units               818,971            818,971 
Currency translation adjustment                   (746)       (746)
Net loss                       (9,708,269)   (9,708,269)
Balance as of December 31, 2016   41,438,818   $64,734,841    5,122,221   $9,913,210   $(37,396)  $(82,631,210)  $(72,755,396)

 

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Statements of Cash Flows

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

   2016   2015 
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net loss  $(9,708,269)  $(9,097,105)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:          
  Depreciation and amortization   146,153    168,602 
  Noncash portion of interest expense   489,731    254,990 
  Amortization of debt discount   1,213,488     
  Change in fair value of warrant liability   (568,103)    
  Compensation expense for issuance of employee warrants   615,548     
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Accounts receivable   31,229    (36,147)
Inventories   (87,339)   738,772 
Prepaid expenses and other assets   29,966    (88,875)
Accounts payable   194,145    154,763 
Accrued liabilities   1,198,939    146,279 
Net cash used in operating activities   (6,444,512)   (7,758,721)
           
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Purchases of property and equipment, net       (45,541)
Net cash used in investing activities       (45,541)
           
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from the issuance of preferred units   1,501,058     
Proceeds from the issuance of common units   219,750    4,554,500 
Proceeds from issuance of promissory notes   685,704    1,528,475 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable   4,411,484    1,509,300 
Repayment of promissory notes   (305,914)   (125,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities   6,512,082    7,467,275 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents   (746)   (12,335)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   66,824    (349,322)
           
Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of year   25,438    374,760 
           
Cash and cash equivalents as of end of year  $92,262   $25,438 
           
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:          
           
Cash paid for income taxes  $50,858   $109,583 
           
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:          
  Issuance of warrants in connection with convertible notes payable  $2,187,390   $ 
  Beneficial conversion feature of convertible notes payable  $809,909   $ 
  Issuance of preferred units upon conversion of convertible notes payable  $300,000   $ 
  Issuance of preferred units in lieu of payment of employee expenses  $87,000   $ 
  Issuance of convertible notes payable upon amendment of promissory notes  $1,947,515   $ 
  Issuance of common units upon conversion of convertible notes payable  $   $2,981,472 
  Conversion of common units to preferred in connection with financing  $62,846,783   $ 
  Repayment of term loan by issuance of convertible notes payable  $   $450,000 
  Reduction of promissory note by shipment of inventory  $75,750   $ 
  Issuance of convertible notes in lieu of payment of principal and accrued interest  $190,536   $ 
  Issuance of convertible notes payable in lieu of payment of expenses for employee  $69,290   $ 

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-7

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

1. Business and Viability of Operations

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC (also refer to as “we”, “us”, “our”, or “the Company”) was originally incorporated in Delaware on July 23, 2010. The Company develops wireless audio integrated circuits for home entertainment and professional audio markets.

 

The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred net operating losses each year since inception. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $82.6 million and has not generated positive cash flows from operations. The Company expects operating losses to continue in the foreseeable future because of additional costs and expenses related to research and development activities, plans to expand its product portfolio, and increase its market share. The Company’s ability to transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon achieving a level of revenues adequate to support its cost structure. Based on current operating levels and required debt repayments, the Company will need to raise additional funds by selling additional equity or incurring additional debt. To date, the Company has not generated significant revenues and has been able to fund its operations through private equity financings from various investors and debt financings. Additionally, future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of revenue growth, the selling price of the Company’s products, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of spending on research and development efforts and the continuing market acceptance of the Company’s products. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Management of the Company intends to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities and debt. There can be no assurance that, in the event the Company requires additional financing, such financing will be available at terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Failure to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, raise additional capital and reduce discretionary spending could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its intended business objectives. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP.”) and include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The consolidated financial statements reflect the accounts of Summit Semiconductor, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Summit Semiconductor K.K., a Japanese corporation and WiSA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Continued

F-8

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

 

Concentration of Credit Risk and Other Risks and Uncertainties

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are deposited in demand and money market accounts at one financial institution. At times, such deposits may be in excess of insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents.

 

The Company’s accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located throughout the world. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and sometimes requires partial payment in advance of shipping. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had two customers accounting for 57% and 15% of accounts receivable. The Company had three customers accounting for 45%, 20% and 13% of its net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had two customers accounting for 84% and 13% of accounts receivable. The Company had three customers accounting for 62%, 15% and 11% of its net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

The Company’s future results of operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect the Company’s future operating results and cause actual results to vary materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, rapid technological change, continued acceptance of the Company’s products, competition from substitute products and larger companies, protection of proprietary technology, strategic relationships and dependence on key individuals.

 

The Company relies on sole-source suppliers to manufacture some of the components used in its product. The Company’s manufacturers and suppliers may encounter problems during manufacturing due to a variety of reasons, any of which could delay or impede their ability to meet demand. The Company is heavily dependent on a single contractor in China for assembly and testing of its products.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoice amount and are generally not interest bearing. The Company reviews its trade receivables aging to identify specific customers with known disputes or collection issues. The Company exercises judgment when determining the adequacy of these reserves as it evaluates historical bad debt trends and changes to customers’ financial conditions. Uncollectible receivables are recorded as bad debt expense when all efforts to collect have been exhausted and recoveries are recognized when they are received.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Carrying amounts of certain of the Company’s financial instruments and investments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. Based upon borrowing rates currently available to the Company for borrowings with similar terms, the carrying value of the outstanding borrowings approximates fair value.

 

Continued

F-9

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

 

Inventories

 

Inventories, principally purchased components, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using an average cost, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory in excess of salable amounts and inventory which is considered obsolete based upon changes in existing technology is written off. At the point of loss recognition, a new lower cost basis for that inventory is established and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in the new cost basis.

 

Property and Equipment, Net

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of two to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life or term of the lease. Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for indicators of possible impairment by comparison of the carrying amounts to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Should an impairment exist, the impairment loss would be measured based on the excess carrying value of the asset over the asset’s fair value or discounted estimates of future cash flows. The Company has not identified any such impairment losses to date.

 

Convertible Financial Instruments

 

The Company bifurcates conversion options and warrants from their host instruments and accounts for them as free standing derivative financial instruments if certain criteria are met. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. An exception to this rule is when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as that term is described under applicable U.S. GAAP.

 

When the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options and warrants should be bifurcated from their host instruments, discounts are recorded for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in the instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the instrument.

 

Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the earlier of the term of the related debt or their earliest date of redemption. 

 

The Company has pledged all its assets, including its personal property, fixtures, intellectual property and products as collateral for certain of its promissory and convertible notes payable.

 

Continued

F-10

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

  

Warrants for Common Units and Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Warrants for common units and other derivative financial instruments are classified as equity if the contracts (1) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (2) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own units (physical settlement or net-share settlement). Contracts which (1) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), (2) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in units (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or (3) that contain reset provisions that do not qualify for the scope exception are classified as equity or liabilities. The Company assesses classification of its warrants for common units and other derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between equity and liabilities is required.

 

The issuance of the convertible notes payable generated a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”), which arises when a debt or equity security is issued with an embedded conversion option that is beneficial to the investor or in the money at inception because the conversion option has an effective strike price that is less than the market price of the underlying stock at the commitment date. The Company recognized the BCF by allocating the intrinsic value of the conversion option, which is the number of units of common stock available upon conversion multiplied by the difference between the effective conversion price per unit and the fair value of common stock per unit on the commitment date, to additional paid-in capital, resulting in a discount on the convertible debt.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company’s revenue is derived predominantly from sales to original equipment manufacturers and original device manufacturers. The Company recognizes revenue from product sales upon shipment if evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured and title and risk of loss has passed. If those criteria are not met, then revenue is not recognized until all of the criteria are satisfied.

 

Transfer of title and risk of ownership occurs when the product is shipped to the customer or when the customer receives the product, depending on the nature of the arrangement. Revenue is recorded net of customer discounts. For sales transactions when collectibility is not reasonably assured, the Company recognizes revenue upon receipt of cash payment. Shipping and handling fees charged to customers are recorded as a component of revenue, net and the related expense as a component of cost of revenue.

 

The Company does not provide its customers with a contractual right of return. However, the Company accepts limited returns on a case-by-case basis. As such, the Company records revenue net of estimated returns based on the historical rates of return.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred. 

 

Net Loss per Common Unit

 

Basic net loss per common unit is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period, without consideration for potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per common unit is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common units and potentially dilutive common unit equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock and if-converted methods. For purposes of the diluted net loss per common unit calculation, preferred units and warrants for common units are considered to be potentially dilutive securities.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015, warrants to purchase 5,813,311 common units have been excluded from the calculation of net loss per common unit because the inclusion would have been antidilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2016, warrants to purchase 17,067,512 shares of common units and 41,438,818 preferred units have been excluded from the calculation of net loss per common unit because the inclusion would be antidilutive.  

 

Continued

F-11

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

  

Income Taxes

 

The Company has elected to be treated as a limited liability corporation (“LLC”) for federal and state income tax purposes, such that the Company’s taxable income is reported by its members in their respective tax returns. The Company is subject only to a California LLC tax which is recorded as a state income tax in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred a provision for income taxes of $9,435 and $9,922 respectively, related to the Company’s foreign operations.

 

Continued

F-12

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

  

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

  

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

 

Comprehensive Loss

 

Comprehensive loss includes all changes within members’ deficit that are not the result of transactions with members. Accumulated other comprehensive loss includes the foreign currency translation adjustments arising from the consolidation of the Company’s foreign subsidiary.

 

Product Warranty

 

The Company’s products are generally subject to a one year warranty, which provides for the repair, rework, or replacement of products (at the Company’s option) that fail to perform within the stated specification. The Company has assessed its historical claims and, to date, product warranty claims have not been significant. The Company will continue to assess if there should be a warranty accrual going forward.

 

Foreign Currency

 

The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s foreign operations are measured using currencies other than the U.S. dollar as their functional currencies. Accordingly, for these operations all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rates as of the respective balance sheet date. Expense items are translated using the weighted average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Cumulative gains and losses from the translation of these operations’ financial statements are reported as a separate component of members’ equity, while foreign currency transaction gains or losses, resulting from remeasuring local currency to the U.S. dollar are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations in other income (expense), net and were not material for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

Advertising Costs

 

Advertising costs are charged to selling and marketing expenses as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were not material.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The update allows entities not to make quantitative disclosures about remaining performance obligations in certain cases and requires entities that use any of the optional exemptions to expand their qualitative disclosures. This standard also clarifies other areas of the new revenue standard, including disclosure requirement for prior period performance obligations, impairment guidance for contract costs and the interaction of impairment guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 340-40 with other guidance elsewhere in the Codification. This update is an amendment to ASU 2014-09 and becomes effective concurrently with ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this new pronouncement on its consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

Continued

F-13

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

  

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued

 

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The amendments in this update, among other things: (1) clarify the objective of the collectability criterion for applying paragraph 606-10-25-7; (2) permit an entity to exclude amounts collected from customers for all sales (and other similar) taxes from the transaction price; (3) specify that the measurement date for noncash consideration is contract inception; (4) provide a practical expedient that permits an entity to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications that occur before the beginning of the earliest period presented when identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, determining the transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations; (5) clarify that a completed contract for purposes of transition is a contract for which all (or substantially all) of the revenue was recognized under legacy U.S. GAAP before the date of initial application, and (6) clarify that an entity that retrospectively applies the guidance under ASU 2014-09 to each prior reporting period is not required to disclose the effect of the accounting change for the period of adoption. This update is an amendment to ASU 2014-09 and becomes effective concurrently with ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The objective of the update is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with a lease term of more than 12 months. In addition, the update will require additional disclosures regarding key information about leasing arrangements. Under existing guidance, operating leases are not recorded as lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The update will be effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amended guidance requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The requirement would replace the current lower of cost or market evaluation. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted to be applied prospectively. The Company adopted this accounting guidance in 2016 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This update that requires an entity to present debt issuance costs on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability as opposed to an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued, and the new guidance would be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. The Company adopted this accounting guidance in 2016 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. This guidance is effective for the Company’s annual reporting period ending December 31, 2016 and all annual and interim reporting periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this standard on December 31, 2016. This guidance requires management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least 12 months from the issuance date of the financial statements and to provide related footnote disclosures.

 

Continued

F-14

 

  

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

  

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for non-public entities for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Non-public entities have the option to adopt at the same time as public entities which is for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

3. Balance Sheet Components

 

Inventories:            
    2016     2015  
Raw materials   $ 4,846     $ 6,153  
Work in progress     221,941       182,767  
Finished goods     359,174       385,452  
Total inventories   $ 585,961     $ 574,372  

  

Property and equipment, net:

 

    2016     2015  
Machinery and Equipment   $ 713,947     $ 715,995  
Tooling     19,900       19,900  
Computer Software     82,831       82,831  
Furniture and Fixtures     15,000       15,000  
Leasehold improvements     11,238       11,238  
      842,916       844,964  
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization     (784,652 )     (640,547 )
Property and equipment, net   $ 58,264     $ 204,417  

  

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $146,153 and $168,602, respectively. 

 

Accrued liabilities:            
    2016     2015  
Accrued compensation   $ 1,177,484     $ 213,102  
Accrued stay bonus     271,670        
Accrued vacation     268,740       266,714  
Accrued other     373,458       412,597  
Total accrued liabilities   $ 2,091,352     $ 892,413  

 

Continued

F-15

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

4. Promissory Notes

 

In connection with the acquisition of the Focus Enhancements, Inc. assets in July 2010, the Company assumed an asset purchase agreement with Hallo Development Co, LLC (“Hallo”). In October 2010, the Hallo agreement was amended to require the Company to pay royalties to Hallo at specified rates based on annual net sales derived from the Company’s purchased technology over a period of three years with a minimum royalty of $900,000. Initial shipments commenced in 2011 and after three years, cumulative royalties due Hallo were $900,000. In April 2014, the Hallo agreement was amended, converting the outstanding balance of $357,500, to an unsecured promissory note (“Hallo Note”), bearing interest at 18.0% per year with an initial maturity date of December 31, 2015, that was later extended. In December 2016, following a principal reduction payment of $37,500, the Hallo Note was amended accordingly (i) the maturity date was changed to “five days following an IPO”, (ii) following a debt or equity financing in excess of $4,000,000, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $12,500, (iii) on the maturity date, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $95,000, and (iv) the remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest, after the payments described in (ii) and (iii) above, shall automatically convert to units in connection with the initial public offering (“IPO”), at a conversion price equal to the average of the highest and the lowest price of the related stock that the Company sold on the maturity date. As a result of such amendment, the Hallo Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable as of December 31, 2016. The Company has recognized interest expense of $50,364 and $58,729 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company made principal reduction payments under the Hallo Note of $57,500 and $125,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, $232,500 was due under the Hallo Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable. As of December 31, 2015, $290,000 of principal was due under the Hallo Note and such amount is classified under promissory notes payable.

 

On December 23, 2014, a significant unit holder provided a $775,000 unsecured advance to the Company (the “December 2014 Advance”). On January 30, 2015, the same significant unit holder provided a $475,000 unsecured advance to the Company (the “January 2015 Advance”). During February 2015, the December 2014 Advance and the January 2015 Advance were extinguished, and the unit holder agreed that the $1,250,000 aggregate principal balance of the advances would be used to fund the investors participation in the Series B Convertible Notes.

 

On January 5, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $500,000 (the “January 2015 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. The initial interest rate was 15.0% per year with an initial maturity date of July 5, 2015, that was later extended. In February 2016, following a principal reduction payment of $225,000, the January 2015 Note the maturity date was extended to June 1, 2017, and (ii) interest rate was adjusted to 10.0% per year. In December 2016, following a principal reduction payment of $23,414, the January 2015 Note was amended accordingly (i) the maturity date was changed to “five days following an IPO”, (ii) interest rate was adjusted to 10.0% per year (iii) following a debt or equity financing in excess of $4,000,000 prior to an IPO, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $12,500, (iv) on the maturity date, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $95,000, and (v) the remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest, after the payments described in (iii) and (iv) above, shall automatically convert to units in connection with the IPO, at a conversion price equal to the average of the highest and the lowest price of the related stock that the Company sold on the maturity date. As a result of such amendment, the January 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable as of December 31, 2016. The Company has recognized interest expense of $31,823 and $68,750 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company made principal reduction payments under the January 2015 Note of $248,414 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, $251,586 was due under the January 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable. As of December 31, 2015, $500,000 of principal was due under the January 2015 Note and such amount is classified under promissory notes payable.

 

Continued

F-16

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

4. Promissory Notes, continued

 

On April 4, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $450,000 (the “April 2015 Note”). The proceeds from April 2015 Note were used to repay the $450,000 loan outstanding with a bank. The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 5.0% per year during the first twelve months and increases to 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally January 31, 2017. An amendment signed in November 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert into the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the April 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $39,514 and $23,167 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, $450,000 of principal was due under the April 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable. As of December 31, 2015, $450,000 of principal was due under the April 2015 Note and such amount is classified under promissory notes payable.

 

On September 18, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $200,000 (the “September 2015 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally January 31, 2017. An amendment signed in November 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the September 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $20,055 and $5,699 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, $200,000 of principal was due under the September 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable. As of December 31, 2015, $200,000 of principal was due under the September 2015 Note and such amount is classified under promissory notes payable.

 

Continued

F-17

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

4. Promissory Notes, continued

 

On December 22, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $353,475 (the “December 2015 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 12.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally September 22, 2016, that was later extended. An amendment signed in December 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the December 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $35,685 and $1,162 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In 2016, the Company shipped finished inventory valued at $75,750 to the lender which agreed that such shipment shall be considered a principal reduction payment. As of December 31, 2016, $277,725 of principal was due under the December 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable. As of December 31, 2015, $353,475 of principal was due under the December 2015 Note and such amount is classified under promissory notes payable.

 

During February 2016, we entered into five different Loan and Securities Agreements and separate Secured Promissory Notes with a total principal face value of $250,000 (the “Five February 2016 Notes”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowings. Interest accrues at a rate 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally February 1, 2017, that was later extended. In December 2016, two of the Five February 2016 Notes were terminated and extinguished and the lenders agreed that the $100,000 aggregate principal balance of the loans and the $8,863 aggregate accrued interest would be used to fund their participation in the Series D convertible notes. The Company recognized interest expense of $22,301 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Three of the Five February 2016 Notes with a principal balance of $150,000 remain outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and are classified as promissory notes.

  

During February, April and June 2016 we entered into three different Loan and Securities Agreements and separate Secured Promissory Notes with Brett Moyer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, with a total principal face value of $135,704 (the “Moyer 2016 Notes”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowings. Interest accrues at a rate 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was one year from the date of issuance (February, April and June 2017, respectively). The Moyer 2016 Notes were terminated and extinguished during December 2016, and Mr. Moyer agreed that the $135,704 aggregate principal balance of the loans and the $9,672 aggregate accrued interest would be used to fund his participation in the Series D convertible notes. The Company has recognized interest expense of $9,672 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

In connection with the Five February 2016 Notes and the Moyer 2016 Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase common units of 1,666,670 and 226,175, respectively (see Note 7 for fair value computation). The sum of the fair value of the warrants for the promissory notes were recorded as a debt discount to be amortized over the respective terms of the various notes. The debt discounts are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $593,690 from the amortization of the debt discount. In connection with the December 2016 termination of two of the Five February 2016 Notes and the Moyer 2016 Notes, the remaining unamortized debt discount of $36,865 was immediately expensed.

 

Continued

F-18

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

4. Promissory Notes, continued

 

Promissory Notes:

 

    As of December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Hallo Note   $     $ 290,000  
January 2015 Note           500,000  
April 2015 Note           450,000  
September 2015 Note           200,000  
December 2015 Note           353,475  
Five February 2016 Notes     150,000        
Total     150,000       1,793,475  
Less: Debt discount     (29,417 )     (10,942 )
Balance at year end   $ 120,583     $ 1,782,533  

  

5. Convertible Notes Payable

 

 

          Carrying Value     Accrued Interest        
    Company     as of     as of     Principal Value  
    Proceeds     December 31, 2016     December 31, 2016     as of Maturity  
Series C Convertible notes payable   $ 2,880,000     $ 25,000     $ 3,155     $ 29,412  
Series D Convertible notes payable     1,573,292       4,923,880       118,666       5,792,800  
Various individual convertible notes payable     1,711,810       1,711,810       240,935       1,711,810  
Total   $ 6,165,102       6,660,690       362,756     $ 7,534,022  
Less: Debt discount             (1,809,082 )              
Less: Beneficial conversion features             (1,117,091 )              
Balance at year end           $ 3,734,517     $ 362,756          

  

2015 Activity

 

During February 2015 through July 2015, the Company received total proceeds of $2,837,800 from the issuance of original issue discount convertible notes (“Series B Convertible Notes”) to investors. The principal balance, plus all accrued and unpaid interest was due February 28, 2016 or at the next equity financing by the Company. The conversion price in effect was the lower of the price equal to 80% of the price of the units in the next equity financings and a unit price based on an enterprise value of the Company of $8,000,000. During August 2015, 12,422,801 common units were issued upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Notes and accrued interest.

 

Continued

F-19

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

5. Convertible Notes Payable, continued

 

2016 Activity

 

On February 12, 2016, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $300,000 (the “February 2016 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally January 31, 2017. An amendment signed in November 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the February 2016 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $26,630 for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, $300,000 of principal was due under the February 2016 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable.

 

The February 2016 Note contains an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation. The Company has determined that the embedded conversion feature has de minimus value as of the date of issuance as the Company was not actively seeking any type of offering or change of control at that time due to the financial condition of the Company.

 

In connection with the February 2016 Note, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 common units (see Note 7 for fair value computation). The sum of the fair value of the warrants for the February 2016 Note was recorded as a debt discount and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest method. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $145,750 from the amortization of the debt discount.

 

On May 11, 2016, a significant unit holder provided a $300,000 unsecured advance to the Company (the “May 2016 Advance”) in contemplation of participating in the Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement dated April 12, 2016, which required the significant unit holder to invest a minimum of $500,000. In July 2016, the significant unit holder invested an additional $200,800 and requested the May 2016 Advance be cancelled and its principal be aggregated with the $200,800 to purchase a total of 1,669,595 preferred units at $0.30 per unit.

 

Series C Convertible Notes Payable

 

During February 2016 through October 2016, the Company received total proceeds of $2,880,000 from the issuance of original issue discount convertible notes (“Series C Convertible Notes”) to investors. The principal balance, plus all accrued and unpaid interest, is due one year from date of issuance (February 2017 to October 2017) or upon a change of control or an IPO by the Company. The conversion price in effect upon on IPO is the lesser of $0.60 or the price per common unit in the pre-money valuation immediately prior to the IPO multiplied by 80%. The conversion price at any other conversion event is $0.60. Issuance costs to obtain the convertible notes were recorded as a debt discount in the amount of $208,800.

 

Continued

F-20

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

5. Convertible Notes Payable, continued

 

Series C Convertible Notes Payable, continued

 

In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investors and investment bankers to purchase common units of 2,823,529 and 395,296, respectively (see Note 7 for fair value computation). The sum of the fair value of the warrants, the BCF and issuance costs for the Series C Convertible Notes were recorded as debt discounts to be amortized to interest expense over the respective term using the effective interest method. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $746,902 from the amortization of the debt discounts. All of the Series C Convertible Notes, except for $25,000, were extinguished and converted to Series D Convertible Notes between November and December 2016.

 

The Series C Convertible Notes contain an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation. The Company has determined that the embedded conversion feature has de minimus value as of the date of issuance as the Company was not actively seeking any type of offering or change of control at that time due to the financial condition of the Company.

 

Series D Convertible Notes Payable

 

During November 2016 and December 2016, the Company received total proceeds of $1,573,292 from the issuance of original issue discount convertible notes (“Series D Convertible Notes”) to investors. In addition, the Company: (i) extinguished Series C Convertible Notes in the amount of $2,855,000 along with accrued interest of $172,059 and converted those to Series D Convertible Notes (ii) extinguished other promissory notes in the amount of $235,704 along with accrued interest of $18,536 and converted those to Series D Convertible Notes and (iii) allowed Mr. Moyer to convert $69,290 of reimbursable expense reports into Series D Convertible Notes. At the date of issuance, the Series D Convertible Notes had a senior priority security interest in all the personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company except for the January 2015 Note and the Hallo Note which had a pari passu security interest with the Series D Convertible Notes. The principal balance, plus all accrued and unpaid interest is due on June 1, 2017. The Series D Convertible Notes are eligible for conversion at any point prior to the maturity date or upon a change of control or an IPO by the Company. The conversion price in effect upon on IPO is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the IPO multiplied by 75%. The conversion price at any other conversion event is $0.30. Issuance costs to obtain the convertible notes were recorded as a debt discount in the amount of $133,068.

 

In connection with the Series D Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investors and investment bankers to purchase common units of 9,156,181 and 3,931,787, respectively (see Note 7 for fair value computation). The sum of the fair value of the warrants, the BCF and issuance costs for the Series D Convertible Notes described above were recorded as debt discounts to be amortized to interest expense over the respective term using the effective interest method. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $18,934 and $4,743, respectively from the amortization of the debt discounts.

 

The Series D Convertible Notes contain an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation. The Company has determined that the embedded conversion feature has de minimus value as of the date of issuance as the Company was not actively seeking any type of offering or change of control at that time due to the financial condition of the Company.

 

Continued

F-21

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

6. Fair Value Measurements

  

The Company measures the fair value of financial instruments using a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Each level of input has different levels of subjectivity and difficulty involved in determining fair value.

 

  Level 1 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Therefore, determining fair value for Level 1 investments generally does not require significant judgment, and the estimation is not difficult.

 

  Level 2 – Pricing is provided by third-party sources of market information obtained through investment advisors. The Company does not adjust for or apply any additional assumptions or estimates to the pricing information received from its advisors.

 

  Level 3 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions. The determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments involves the most management judgment and subjectivity.

 

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 by level within the fair value hierarchy, are as follows:

 

    December 31, 2016  
    Quoted
prices in
active
markets
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
 
    (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Liabilities:                        
Warrant liability   $     $     $ 1,619,287  

  

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

The following table includes a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s warrant liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

      Warrant Liability  
    2016     2015  
Beginning balance   $     $  
Additions     2,187,390        
Change in fair value     (568,103 )      
Ending balance   $ 1,619,287     $  

  

The changes in fair value of the warrant liability are recorded in change in fair value of warrant liability in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Continued

F-22

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

6. Fair Value Measurements, continued

  

A summary of the weighted average significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) used in measuring the Company’s warrant liability that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:

  

    As of  
    December 31, 2016  
Common Unit Price   $ 0.30  
Term (Years)     4.95  
Volatility     52 %
Risk-free rate of interest     1.93 %
Dividend Yield     0.0 %

  

7. Preferred Units and Members’ Deficit

 

The Members have organized a Delaware limited liability company and adopted a Limited Liability Company Agreement on July 27, 2010, as amended and restated on July 13, 2011, December 18, 2014 and April 9, 2016. The units are classified into common and preferred units, and a member is entitled to the right to one vote for each unit held. Subject to the terms of the Company’s Carve-Out Plan, the Carve-Out Plan participants are entitled to receive any distribution payable prior to any liquidation payments to the members. (See Note 8.) The holders of preferred units are entitled to a liquidation preference prior to any distributions to holders of common units of $0.30 per unit, respectively, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends, if any. If the amounts available for distribution are insufficient to permit the payments to the members holding preferred units, then the available distributions will be made on a pro rata basis among the holders of the preferred units. Distribution of any remaining assets or proceeds upon liquidation will be made to the holders of common units in an amount equal to the aggregate purchase price paid for the units and for convertible securities divided by the aggregate purchase price paid by all holders for common and preferred units and convertible securities. If the amounts available for distribution are insufficient to permit the payments to the members holding common units, then the available distributions will be made on a pro rata basis among the holders of the common units. The holders of preferred units have no voluntary rights to redeem units. A liquidation or winding up of the Company, a greater than 50% change in control, or a sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets would constitute a redemption event. Although the preferred units are not mandatorily or currently redeemable, a liquidation or winding up of the Company would constitute a redemption event that is outside of the Company’s control. Therefore, all preferred units have been presented outside of members’ deficit. All profits and losses of the Company are allocated to the members based on their ownership percentages.

 

Preferred Units

 

At various dates between April 2016 and July 2016, the Company entered into purchase agreements with investors for the sale of 5,381,572 preferred units at $0.30 per unit, resulting in gross cash proceeds of $1,614,471 and net cash proceeds of $1,501,058, after payment of underwriting costs of $113,413. In addition, preferred units of 1,290,000 were purchased with non-cash contributions resulting from the conversion of a $300,000 promissory note and the conversion of reimbursable employee expenses of $87,000. To participate in this financing transaction, common unit holders were required to contribute the lesser of (i) 14 percent of their total prior investments or (ii) $500,000. If that criterion were met, then all common units held by that investor would automatically convert to an equal number of preferred units. In connection with this financing 34,767,246 common units were converted to preferred units.

 

Common Units

 

At various dates between April 2015 and November 2015, the Company entered into purchase agreements with investors for the sale of 16,666,666 common units at $0.30 per unit, resulting in gross cash proceeds of $5,000,000 and net cash proceeds of $4,554,500, after payment of underwriting costs of $445,500.

 

At various dates between February 2015 and July 2015, the Company issued common units of 12,422,801 upon the conversion of convertible notes payable. The total amount of the debt conversion was $2,981,472.

 

Continued

F-23

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

7. Preferred Units and Members’ Deficit, continued

 

During January, February and April 2016, we entered into purchase agreements with investors for the sale of 800,000 common units at $0.30 per unit, resulting in gross cash proceeds of $240,000 and net cash proceeds of $219,750, after payment of underwriting costs of $20,250.

 

Warrants for Common Units

 

The Company has issued warrants to purchase common units to employees as compensation for services rendered, as well as, in conjunction with the purchase of common units in equity and debt transactions. A summary of the warrant activity and related information as of December 31, 2016 is provided follows. 

 

In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,823,529 common units at an exercise price of $0.69 per unit with a five-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $746,902 which was recorded as warrant liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the Series C Convertible Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 55%, risk-free interest rate 1.18% and expected life of 5 years. In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the remaining fair value of the warrants of $183,078 was converted into Series D Convertible Notes warrants.

 

In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investment bankers to purchase 395,296 common units at an exercise price of $0.69 per unit with a five-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $100,405 which was recorded as warrant liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the Series C Convertible Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 53%, risk-free interest rate 1.10% and expected life of 5 years. In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the remaining fair value of the warrants of $100,405 was converted into Series D Convertible Notes.

 

In connection with the Series D Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 9,156,181 common units at an exercise price of $0.36 per unit with a five-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $1,136,024. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.30, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 52%, risk-free interest rate 1.85% and expected life of 5 years. After consideration of the modification of the Series C warrants, the incremental fair value of the Series D warrants of $952,946 was recorded as warrant liability.

 

In connection with the Series D Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investment bankers to purchase 3,931,787 common units at an exercise price of $0.36 per unit with a five-year term. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.30, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 52%, risk-free interest rate 1.93% and expected life of 5 years. After consideration of the modification of the Series C warrants, the incremental fair value of the Series D investment banker warrants was $387,137 was recorded as warrant liability.

 

In connection with the Series C, Series D and Series E Convertible Notes, the Company recognized the fair value of the warrants as a liability, as the warrant agreements included a price protection provision adjusting the exercise price of the warrant in the event the Company issued units (i) at a price per share less than the exercise price then in effect or (ii) without consideration.

 

Continued

F-24

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

7. Preferred Units and Members’ Deficit, continued

 

Warrants for Common Units, continued

 

During 2016, the Company granted warrants to purchase up to 1,562,189 common units to employees as compensation. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.30 per unit and are exercisable upon a change in control of the Company if the change in control occurs before May 2021. The fair value of the warrants was $615,548 which was recorded as compensation expense with the offset recorded to members’ deficit. The fair value of the warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 56%, risk-free interest rate 1.11% and expected life of 5 years.

 

In connection with the February 2016 Note, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 common units at an exercise price $0.36 per unit with a three-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $159,000 which was recorded as a component of members’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the February 2016 Note. The fair value of the warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 53%, risk-free interest rate 0.89% and expected life of 3 years.

 

In connection with the Five February 2016 Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,666,670 common units at an exercise price $0.30 per unit with a three-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $588,335 which was recorded as a component of members’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the Five February 2016 Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 53%, risk-free interest rate 0.91% and expected life of 3 years.

 

In connection with the Moyer 2016 Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 226,175 common units at an exercise price $0.36 per unit with a three-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $71,638 which was recorded as a component of members’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the Moyer 2016 Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 52%, risk-free interest rate 0.94% and expected life of 3 years.

 

Information regarding warrants for common units outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2016 is as follows: 

 

Exercise     Warrants     Remaining     Warrants  
Price     Outstanding     Life (years)     Exercisable  
                     
$ 0.30       3,228,859       3.23       1,666,670  
$ 0.36       13,814,143       4.03       13,814,143  
$ 0.69       24,510       4.96       24,510  
$ 0.40       17,067,512       4.05       15,505,323  

 

Warrants exercisable above, excludes 1,562,189 warrants that have been granted to employees that are outstanding but only become exercisable upon a change of control of the Company.

 

Continued

F-25

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

8. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases

 

The Company rents its office under an operating lease, which expires in October 2018. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is responsible for taxes, insurance and maintenance expense. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $329,000 and $281,000, respectively.

 

Future annual minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable operating lease as of December 31, 2016 are $300,000 for the year ending December 31, 2017 and $266,000 for the year ending December 31, 2018.

 

Other Commitments

 

Employees, consultants, and directors of the Company are entitled to participate in the Company’s Carve-Out Plan (the “Plan”) at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. Each Plan participant is awarded points which entitle the participant to a portion of the proceeds payable to the Company and/or its members upon a sale of the Company. The proceeds payable to a Plan participant shall equal an amount determined in accordance with the following formula: (number of points held by participant /total points outstanding)*18% of Net Sale Price. For this purpose, “Net Sale Price” equals the aggregate amount payable to the Company and/or its members in connection with a sale of the Company less all amounts payable to creditors of the Company. Awards payable to Plan participants are senior to any amounts payable to members of the Company. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has not recorded a liability relating to this Plan. Any amounts payable under the Plan will be recognized as compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations during the period the Company becomes obligated to make such payments.

 

Contingencies

 

In the normal course of business, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of a possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred.

 

The Company’s management does not believe that any such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

9. Assumption of WiSA, LLC

 

On April 25, 2014, the Company assumed 100% of Silicon Image, Inc.’s (“SIMG”) interest in WiSA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“WiSA”). WiSA (“Wireless Speaker and Audio Association”) is a trade association jointly established by the Company and SIMG in July 2011, for the promotion of the Company’s proprietary technology for the wireless transmission and reception of audio from a source device. SIMG had been responsible for acting as an agent of WiSA and managing the day-to-day affairs of WiSA including the development of its trademarks and marketing plans.

 

SIMG assigned its ownership in WiSA to the Company at no cost and gave the Company a three year license to use the WiSA trademarks for $100. In addition, at the Company’s sole discretion, the Company has the option to purchase the WiSA trademarks for $2,000,000 at the earlier of (i) April 25, 2017 or (ii) the closing date of a “Change in Ownership” as defined in the Company’s July 13, 2011 Operating Agreement.

 

Continued

F-26

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

9. Assumption of WiSA, LLC, continued

 

No assets or liabilities were booked in connection with the Company’s assumption of SIMG’s interest in WiSA as the Company was already a party to the marketing plans and only received a license to the trademarks which were determined to have no incremental value.

 

10. Related Parties

 

Brett Moyer

 

Mr. Moyer has served as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and a board member since the Company’s founding in August 2010.

 

In February 2015, Mr. Moyer participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing by investing $197,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, Mr. Moyer’s Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $208,032. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, Mr. Moyer’s convertible note was extinguished and converted into 866,800 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Moyer owned 2.2% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

In 2016, Mr. Moyer loaned the Company $185,704 via the issuance of various notes described in Note 4 as the Moyer 2016 Notes ($135,704) and as one of the participants in the Five February 2016 Notes ($50,000). In July 2016, Mr. Moyer participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $87,000 by extinguishing $87,000 of reimbursable expenses. In connection with this preferred unit financing, Mr. Moyer’s $87,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 290,000 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, Mr. Moyer’s 866,801 common units, immediately outstanding prior to his participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 866,801 preferred units. In December 2016, Mr. Moyer extinguished the Moyer 2016 Notes, his portion of the Five February 2016 Note and $69,290 of reimbursable expense reports, and invested the aggregate sum of $269,091 in the Series D Convertible Notes financing. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Moyer was owed $269,091 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 2.5% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

Jonathan Gazdak

 

Mr. Gazdak, works as Managing Director – Head of Investment Banking for Alexander Capital an investment banking firm based in New York. Mr. Gazdak has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since June 2015. Alexander Capital has acted as the lead investment bank in a number of the Company’s private financings.

 

In February 2015, Mr. Gazdak participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing by investing $25,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, Mr. Gazdak’s Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $26,133. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, Mr. Gazdak’s Series B Convertible Note was extinguished and converted into 108,889 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price. In June 2015, Mr. Gazdak participated in the Company’s common unit financing by investing $50,000. In connection with this common unit financing, Mr. Gazdak’s $50,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 166,667 common units. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, Mr. Gazdak owned 0.7% and 0.6%, respectively, of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

Continued

F-27

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

10. Related Parties, continued

 

The Company has signed an engagement letter with Alexander Capital under which Alexander Capital earns a fee on total investments by their clients. Alexander Capital earned fees of $359,311 and $504,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and as of December 31, 2016, had been issued 3,400,061 common unit warrants that are exercisable at $0.30 per unit and have a five year life.

 

Helge Kristensen

 

Mr. Kristensen has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2010. Mr. Kristensen is a managing member of Inizio Capital, an investment company based in China and Hansong Technology LTD, an original device manufacture of audio products based in China.

 

In February 2015, Inizio Capital participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing by investing $300,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, Inizio Capital’s Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $314,800. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, Inizio Capital’s Series B Convertible Note was extinguished and converted into 1,311,667 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price. In December 2015, Hansong Technology loaned the Company $353,475 under a promissory note (See Note 4 – December 2015 Note). As of December 31, 2015, affiliates of Mr. Kristensen were owed $353,475 of principal under promissory notes and owned 3.4% of the Company’s outstanding units.

 

In February 2016, Inizio Capital invested $50,000 as one the participants in the Five February 2016 Notes (see Note 4). In April of 2016, the Company shipped finished inventory valued at $75,750 to Hansong Technology, which the parties agreed would be a principal reduction payment of the December 2015 Note. In May 2016, Inizio Capital participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $131,696. In connection with this preferred unit financing, Inizio Capital’s $131,696 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 438,987 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, Inizio Capital’s 1,311,667 common units, immediately outstanding prior to its participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 1,311,667 preferred units. As of December 31, 2016, affiliates of Mr. Kristensen were owed $327,725 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 3.8% of the Company’s outstanding units.

 

David Carlick

 

Mr. Carlick served as a member of the Company’s board of directors from May 2015 to November 2016. In April 2016, Mr. Carlick participated in the Company’s common unit financing by investing $15,000. In connection with this common unit financing, Mr. Carlick’s $15,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 50,000 common units. In May 2016, Mr. Carlick participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $5,014. In connection with this preferred unit financing, Mr. Carlick $5,014 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 16,713 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, Mr. Carlick’s 50,000 common units, immediately outstanding prior to his participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 50,000 preferred units. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Carlick owned 0.1% of the Company’s outstanding units.

 

Continued

F-28

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

10.Related Parties, continued

 

Significant Unitholders

 

As of December 31, 2014, a significant unitholder owned 90% of the outstanding units of the Company and was owed $775,000 under a promissory note (see Note 4 - the December 2014 Advance).

 

In 2015, the same significant unitholder participated in the Company’s Series B Convertible Notes financing in the amount of $1,490,800 by investing $475,000 in February 2015, $240,800 in August 2015 and by including his December 2014 Advance of $775,000. At the time of conversion in August 2015, the significant unitholder Series B Convertible Note had a maturity value of $1,564,332. In accordance with the terms of the Series B Convertible Notes, the significant unitholder’s convertible notes were extinguished and converted into 6,518,049 common units using a $0.24 per unit conversion price. Additionally in 2015, the significant unitholder loaned the Company $650,000 in two tranches identified in Note 4 as the April 2015 Note ($450,000) and the September 2015 Note ($250,000). As of December 31, 2015, the significant unitholder was owed $650,000 of principal under promissory notes and owned 39.6% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

In 2016, the same significant unitholder loaned the Company an additional $600,000 in two tranches identified in Note 5 as the February 2016 Note ($300,000) and the May 2016 Advance ($300,000). In July 2016, the significant unitholder participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $500,878 by investing an additional $200,878 in July 2016 and including his May 2016 Advance of $300,000. In connection with this preferred unit financing, the significant unitholder’s $500,878 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 1,669,595 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, the significant unitholder’s 15,468,049 common units, immediately outstanding prior to his participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 15,468,049 preferred units. As of December 31, 2016, the significant unitholder was owed $950,000 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 36.8% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

Another significant unitholder is a client of Alexander Capital who began investing in the Company in 2015. In 2015, this significant unitholder participated in the Company’s common unit financing by investing a total of $3,000,000. In connection with this common unit financing, this significant unitholder’s $3,000,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 10,000,000 common units. As of December 31, 2015, this significant unitholder owned 25.6% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

In July 2016, this significant unitholder participated in the Company’s preferred unit financing in the amount of $500,000. In connection with this preferred unit financing, this significant unitholder’s $500,000 was converted at $0.30 per unit thereby receiving 1,666,667 preferred units. In addition, as described in Note 7 – Preferred Units, all participants who participated in the preferred unit financing had their outstanding common units immediately convert into an equal number of preferred units. As such, this significant unitholder’s 10,000,000 common units, immediately outstanding prior to her participation in the preferred unit financing were converted into 10,000,000 preferred units. In November 2016, this significant unitholder invested $500,000 in the Series D Convertible Note financing. As of December 31, 2016, this significant unitholder was owed $588,235 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 25.1% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

Continued
F-29

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

11.Segment Information

 

The Company operates in one business segment, wireless audio products. Our chief decision-maker, the President and Chief Executive Officer, evaluates our performance based on company-wide consolidated results.

 

Net revenue from customers is designated based on the geographic region to which the product is delivered. Net revenue by geographic region was as follows:

 

   For the year ended December 31, 
   2016   2015 
United States  $40,230   $113,438 
Europe   635,532    1,388,321 
Asia Pacific   597,351    610,236 
Total  $1,273,113   $2,111,995 

 

12.Subsequent Events

 

The Company has evaluated all events occurring subsequent to December 31, 2016 through October 30, 2017, which is the date these consolidated financial statements were available to be issued, and did not identify any additional material recognizable subsequent events, other than the events described in the following paragraphs.

 

Financing

 

Between January 1, 2017 and August 30, 2017, the Company issued $3,712,588 of additional Series D Convertible Notes raising gross proceeds $3,143,700 and cancelling $12,000 of expenses. In connection with the additional Series D Convertible Notes the Company issued 6,187,647 warrants to its lenders and 557,841 warrants to the investment bankers. The warrants have a five year life and are exercisable into common units at $0.36 per unit.

 

In May 2017, the remaining holders of the Five February 2016 Notes agreed to amend their notes to include a provision that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%.

 

On May 17, 2017, the Company entered into a security purchase agreement under which the Company may issue up to $5,882,353 of original issue discount convertible promissory notes (“Series E Convertible Note”). Between May 17, 2017 and October 30, 2017 the Company received gross proceeds of $5,000,000 and issued Series E Convertible Notes of $5,882,353. The Series E Convertible Notes include an original issue discount of 15% and have a senior priority security interest in all the personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company. The principal balance of the Series E Convertible Notes, plus all accrued interest is due on October 31, 2017. The maturity date of the Series E Convertible Notes will be extended to November 30, 2017 if the Company submits a complete filing for a public offering prior to October 31, 2017. The Series E Convertible Notes are eligible for conversion at any point prior to the maturity date or upon a change of control or an IPO by the Company. The conversion price in effect upon on IPO is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the IPO multiplied by 75%. The conversion price at any other conversion event is the lessor of $0.30 or the price per unit issued by the Company in connection with any sale involving substantially all the assets of the Company.

 

In connection with the issuance of the $5,882,353 of Series E Convertible Notes, the Company issued 19,607,843 warrants to the lender and 1,458,333 warrants to investment bankers. The warrants have a five year life and are exercisable into common units at $0.30 and $0.36 per unit, respectively.

 

Continued
F-30

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

  

 

12.Subsequent Events, continued

 

Financing, continued

 

Additionally, in connection with the Series E Convertible Note financing, all of the Company’s outstanding promissory and convertible note holders agreed to: (i) subordinate their notes to the Series E Convertible Notes, (ii) release all security interests in the Company’s assets in favor of the Series E Convertible Notes (iii) extend their maturity dates to February 28, 2018 and (iv) amend the Company’s Operating Agreement to allow the Series E Convertible Note lender one seat on the Company’s Board of Directors so long as the investor owns any debt or securities of the Company.

 

WiSA LLC

 

On May 17, 2017, the Company and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (“Lattice”), the acquirer of Silicon Image Inc., agreed to amend the license and transfer agreement between Summit Semiconductor and Silicon Image dated March 26, 2014. Under the terms of the amendment, the Company’s license of the WiSA trademarks would be extended to September 15, 2017 upon a payment of $25,000 to Lattice; the Company completed such payment on May 19, 2017. On October 16, 2017, in connection with a second amendment to the transfer agreement, the Company paid Lattice $125,000 and Lattice (i) assigned its entire equity interest in the Company, consisting of 250,000 common units to the Company and (ii) assigned the WiSA trademarks to the Company.

 

F-31

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

                      Pro Forma  
                Pro Forma     as adjusted  
                as of     as of  
    December 31,     September 30,     September 30,     September 30,  
    2016     2017     2017     2017  
Assets   (1)   (unaudited)     (unaudited)(2)     (unaudited)(3)  
Current Assets:                                
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 92,262     $ 436,404                  
Accounts receivable, net     7,089       53,184                  
Inventories     585,961       465,337                  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     101,517       176,585                  
Total current assets     786,829       1,131,510                  
                                 
Property and equipment, net     58,264       9,873                  
Other assets     97,546       97,546                  
Total assets   $ 942,639     $ 1,238,929                  
Liabilities, Preferred Units and Members’ Deficit                                
Current Liabilities:                                
Accounts payable   $ 1,034,699     $ 826,378                  
Accrued liabilities     2,091,352       960,318                  
Accrued interest     362,756       2,005,941                  
Promissory notes     120,583                        
Convertible notes payable     3,734,517       5,867,747                  
Total current liabilities     7,343,907       9,660,384                  
                                 
Derivative liability           4,183,000                  
Warrant liability     1,619,287       1,748,716                  
Total liabilities     8,963,194       15,592,100                  
                                 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)                                
Preferred units, no par value, 41,438,818 units authorized and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (liquidation preference of $12,432,000 as of September 30, 2017)     64,734,841       64,734,841              
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 2,762,594 and zero shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 - pro forma and pro forma as adjusted                 64,734,841        
Members’ Deficit:                                
Common units, no par value, 5,122,221 units authorized and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively     9,913,210       13,064,875              
Common stock, par value $0.0001, 200,000,000 shares authorized and 341,481 and 3,104,075 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 - pro forma and pro forma as adjusted                 34       310  
Additional paid-in capital                 13,064,841       77,799,406  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (37,396 )     (40,750 )     (40,750 )     (40,750 )
Accumulated deficit     (82,631,210 )     (92,112,137 )     (92,112,137 )     (92,112,137 )
Total members’ deficit     (72,755,396 )     (79,088,012 )     (79,088,012 )     (14,353,171 )
Total liabilities, preferred units and members’ deficit   $ 942,639     $ 1,238,929     $ 1,238,929     $ 1,238,929  

 

 

(1) The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 was derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date.

(2) The pro forma column shows the reclassification of preferred and common units to preferred and common stock in connection with the Company’s conversion from an LLC to a C Corporation.

(3) The pro forma as adjusted column shows both the conversion of the Company from an LLC to a C Corporation as well as the conversion of all preferred stock to common stock in connection with the Company’s initial public offering.

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-32

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(unaudited)

 

 

 

    Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2016     2017  
             
Revenue, net   $ 990,915     $ 901,454  
Cost of revenue     1,222,092       1,028,871  
Gross profit     (231,177 )     (127,417 )
                 
Operating Expenses:                
Research and development     4,280,693       2,783,064  
Sales and marketing     1,582,628       1,251,887  
General and administrative     723,992       856,697  
Total operating expenses     6,587,313       4,891,648  
Loss from operations     (6,818,490 )     (5,019,065 )
Interest expense     (1,134,469 )     (7,654,750 )
Change in fair value of warrant liability     51,142       3,203,468  
Other income (expense), net     (5,061 )     (7,630 )
Loss before provision for income taxes     (7,906,878 )     (9,477,977 )
Provision for income taxes     3,622       2,950  
Net loss   $ (7,910,500 )   $ (9,480,927 )
           
Net loss per common unit - basic and diluted   $ (0.32 )   $ (1.85 )
                 
Weighted average number of common units used in computing net loss per common unit     24,779,040       5,122,221  
           
Pro forma net loss per common share - basic and diluted (1)   $ (4.79 )   $ (27.76 )
           
Pro forma weighted average number of common shares used in computing pro forma net loss per common shares (1)     1,651,936       341,481  
           
Pro forma as adjusted net loss per common share - basic and diluted (2)           $ (3.05 )
           
Pro forma as adjusted weighted average number of common shares used in computing pro forma as adjusted net loss per common share (2)             3,104,043  

 

 

 

(1) Pro forma shows the reclassification of preferred and common units to preferred and common stock in connection with the Company’s conversion from an LLC to a C Corporation.

(2) Pro forma as adjusted shows both the conversion of the Company from an LLC to a C Corporation as well as the conversion of all preferred stock to common stock in connection with the Company’s initial public offering.

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-33

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(unaudited)

 

 

 

    2016     2017  
             
Net loss   $ (7,910,500 )   $ (9,480,927 )
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:                
Foreign currency translation adjustment     1,038       (3,354 )
Comprehensive loss   $ (7,909,462 )   $ (9,484,281 )

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-34

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

    Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2016     2017  
Cash flows from operating activities:                
Net loss   $ (7,910,500 )   $ (9,480,927 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
Depreciation and amortization     112,476       50,486  
Noncash portion of interest expense     281,814       1,652,419  
Amortization of debt discount     798,967       5,475,903  
Change in fair value of warrant liability     (51,142 )     (3,203,468 )
Compensation expense for issuance of employee warrants     615,548        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                
Accounts receivable     1,093       (46,095 )
Inventories     (106,302 )     (157,101 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets     (29,826 )     (75,068 )
Accounts payable     218,672       (196,321 )
Accrued liabilities     1,106,210       (1,131,034 )
Net cash used in operating activities     (4,962,990 )     (7,111,206 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:                
Purchases of property and equipment, net     2,048       (2,095 )
Net cash used in investing activities     2,048       (2,095 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:                
Proceeds from the issuance of preferred units     1,501,058        
Proceeds from the issuance of common units     219,750        
Proceeds from issuance of promissory notes     3,474,904        
Repayment of promissory notes     (238,023 )      
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable           7,518,700  
Repayment of convertible notes payable           (57,903 )
Net cash provided by financing activities     4,957,689       7,460,797  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents     1,038       (3,354 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents     (2,215 )     344,142  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of year     25,438       92,262  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents as of end of year   $ 23,223     $ 436,404  
                 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:                
Cash paid for income taxes   $ 3,622     $ 2,950  
                 
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:                
  Issuance of warrants in connection with convertible notes payable   $ 797,307     $ 3,332,897  
  Beneficial conversion feature of convertible notes payable   $ 696,902     $ 3,151,665  
  Issuance of preferred units upon conversion of convertible notes payable   $ 300,000     $  
  Issuance of preferred units in lieu of payment of employee expenses   $ 87,000     $  
  Issuance of convertible notes payable upon amendment of promissory notes   $     $ 150,000  
  Conversion of common units to preferred in connection with financing   $ 62,846,783     $  
  Reduction of convertible notes payable by shipment of inventories   $ 75,750     $ 277,725  
  Conversion of interest to convertible notes payable as principal   $     $ 9,234  
  Issuance of convertible notes payable in lieu of vendor expense payment   $     $ 12,000  
  Fair value of derivative liability in connection with issuance of notes payable   $     $ 4,183,000  

 

The accompanying notes are integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-35

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

1. Business and Viability of Operations

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC. (also refer to as “we”, “us”, “our”, or “the Company”) was originally incorporated in Delaware on July 27, 2010. The Company develops wireless audio integrated circuits for home entertainment and professional audio markets.

 

Liquidity and management plans

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. However, since inception, the Company has sustained significant operating losses and such losses are expected to continue for the foreseeable future. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $92.1 million and cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.4 million, and has not generated positive cash flows from operations. As a result of these conditions, management has concluded that substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern exists as conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable the Company will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date of issuance of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Management expects operating losses to continue in the foreseeable future because of additional costs and expenses related to research and development activities, plans to expand its product portfolio, and increase its market share. The Company’s ability to transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon achieving a level of revenues adequate to support its cost structure. Based on current operating levels and required debt repayments, the Company will need to raise additional funds by selling additional equity or incurring additional debt. To date, the Company has not generated significant revenues and has been able to fund its operations through private equity financings from various investors and debt financings. Additionally, future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of revenue growth, the selling price of the Company’s products, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of spending on research and development efforts and the continuing market acceptance of the Company’s products. Management intends to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities and debt. There can be no assurance that, in the event the Company requires additional financing, such financing will be available at terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Failure to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, raise additional capital and reduce discretionary spending could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its intended business objectives.

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of the Company’s assets and the satisfaction of the Company’s liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business and does not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects of the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

 

Continued
F-36

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited) 

 

 

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include only normal and recurring adjustments that the Company believes are necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position and the results of operations and cash flows. Interim period results are not necessarily indicative of results of operations or cash flows for a full year or any subsequent interim period. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Because all of the disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements are not included herein, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes accompanying them should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this registration statement.

 

Unaudited pro forma presentation

 

The unaudited pro forma members’ deficit as of September 30, 2017 reflects the conversion of the Company to a C Corporation from an LLC as discussed in Note 11. The unaudited pro forma as adjusted members’ deficit as of September 30, 2017 reflects the assumed conversion of all the Company’s outstanding shares of convertible preferred shares into common shares. The pro forma balance sheet assumes that the completion of the initial public offering (“IPO”) contemplated by this prospectus had occurred as of September 30, 2017 and excludes common shares issued in such initial public offering and any related net proceeds.

 

The unaudited pro forma as adjusted basic and diluted net loss per common share has been computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding after giving effect to the conversion of the Company to a C Corporation from an LLC as discussed in Note 11 and the assumed conversion of all the outstanding convertible preferred shares to common shares immediately prior to the IPO. For purposes of pro forma as adjusted basic and diluted net loss per common share, all convertible preferred shares have been treated as though they have been converted to common shares at the later of the issuance date or on January 1, 2017. The pro forma net loss per common share does not include the common shares expected to be sold and related proceeds to be received from the IPO.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Continued
F-37

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

 

Concentration of Credit Risk and Other Risks and Uncertainties

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are deposited in demand and money market accounts at one financial institution. At times, such deposits may be in excess of insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents.

 

The Company’s accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located throughout the world. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and sometimes requires partial payment in advance of shipping. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had one customer accounting for 94% of accounts receivable. The Company had three customers accounting for 50%, 31% and 8% of its net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company had three customers accounting for 38%, 16% and 16% of its net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

 

The Company’s future results of operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect the Company’s future operating results and cause actual results to vary materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, rapid technological change, continued acceptance of the Company’s products, competition from substitute products and larger companies, protection of proprietary technology, strategic relationships and dependence on key individuals.

 

The Company relies on sole-source suppliers to manufacture some of the components used in its product. The Company’s manufacturers and suppliers may encounter problems during manufacturing due to a variety of reasons, any of which could delay or impede their ability to meet demand. The Company is heavily dependent on a single contractor in China for assembly and testing of its products.

 

Convertible Financial Instruments

 

The Company bifurcates conversion options and warrants from their host instruments and accounts for them as freestanding derivative financial instruments if certain criteria are met. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. An exception to this rule is when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as that term is described under applicable U.S. GAAP.

 

When the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options and warrants should be bifurcated from their host instruments, discounts are recorded for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in the instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the instrument.

 

Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized to interest expense using the interest method over the earlier of the term of the related debt or their earliest date of redemption. 

 

The Company has pledged all its assets, including its personal property, fixtures, intellectual property and products as collateral for certain of its promissory and convertible notes payable.

 

Continued
F-38

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

 

Warrants for Common Units and Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Warrants for common units and other derivative financial instruments are classified as equity if the contracts (1) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (2) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own units (physical settlement or net-share settlement). Contracts which (1) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), (2) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in units (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or (3) that contain reset provisions that do not qualify for the scope exception are classified as equity or liabilities. The Company assesses classification of its warrants for common units and other derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between equity and liabilities is required.

 

The issuance of the convertible notes payable generated a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”), which arises when a debt or equity security is issued with an embedded conversion option that is beneficial to the investor or in the money at inception because the conversion option has an effective strike price that is less than the market price of the underlying stock at the commitment date. The Company recognized the BCF by allocating the intrinsic value of the conversion option, which is the number of units of common stock available upon conversion multiplied by the difference between the effective conversion price per unit and the fair value of common stock per unit on the commitment date, to common units, resulting in a discount on the convertible debt.

 

Comprehensive Loss

 

Comprehensive loss includes all changes within members’ deficit that are not the result of transactions with members. Accumulated other comprehensive loss includes the foreign currency translation adjustments arising from the consolidation of the Company’s foreign subsidiary.

 

Foreign Currency

 

The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s foreign operations are measured using currencies other than the U.S. dollar as their functional currencies. Accordingly, for these operations all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rates as of the respective balance sheet date. Expense items are translated using the weighted average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Cumulative gains and losses from the translation of these operations’ financial statements are reported as a separate component of members’ equity, while foreign currency transaction gains or losses, resulting from remeasuring local currency to the U.S. dollar are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations in other income (expense), net and were not material for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

 

Advertising Costs

 

Advertising costs are charged to selling and marketing expenses as incurred. Advertising costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were not material.

 

Continued
F-39

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company has reviewed recent accounting pronouncements, other than those presented in the audited consolidated financial statements included in this registration statement, and concluded the pronouncements are either not applicable to the business, or no material effect is expected on the consolidated financial statements as a result of future adoption.

 

3. Balance Sheet Components

 

Inventories:

 

    September 30,     December 31,  
    2017     2016  
Raw materials   $ 4,218     $ 4,846  
Work in progress     122,398       221,941  
Finished goods     338,721       359,174  
                 
Total inventories   $ 465,337     $ 585,961  

 

Property and equipment, net:

 

    September 30,     December 31,  
    2017     2016  
Machinery and Equipment   $ 716,042     $ 713,947  
Tooling     19,900       19,900  
Computer Software     82,831       82,831  
Furniture and Fixtures     15,000       15,000  
Leasehold improvements     11,238       11,238  
      845,011       842,916  
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization     (835,138 )     (784,652 )
                 
Property and equipment, net   $ 9,873     $ 58,264  

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $50,486 and $112,476, respectively.

 

Accrued liabilities:

 

    September 30,     December 31,  
    2017     2016  
Accrued compensation   $ 334,964     $ 1,177,484  
Accrued stay bonus     236,569       271,670  
Accrued vacation     199,524       268,740  
Accrued other     189,261       373,458  
                 
Total accrued liabilities   $ 960,318     $ 2,091,352  

 

Continued
F-40

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

4. Promissory Notes

 

In connection with the acquisition of the Focus Enhancements, Inc. assets in July 2010, the Company assumed an asset purchase agreement with Hallo Development Co, LLC (“Hallo”). In October 2010, the Hallo agreement was amended to require the Company to pay royalties to Hallo at specified rates based on annual net sales derived from the Company’s purchased technology over a period of three years with a minimum royalty of $900,000. Initial shipments commenced in 2011 and after three years, cumulative royalties due Hallo were $900,000. In April 2014, the Hallo agreement was amended, converting the outstanding balance of $357,500, to an unsecured promissory note (“Hallo Note”), bearing interest at 18.0% per year with an initial maturity date of December 31, 2015, that was later extended. In December 2016, following a principal reduction payment of $37,500, the Hallo Note was amended accordingly (i) the maturity date was changed to “five days following an IPO”, (ii) following a debt or equity financing in excess of $4,000,000, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $12,500, (iii) on the maturity date, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $95,000, and (iv) the remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest, after the payments described in (ii) and (iii) above, shall automatically convert to units in connection with the initial public offering (“IPO”), at a conversion price equal to the average of the highest and the lowest price of the related stock that the Company sold on the maturity date. As a result of such amendment, the Hallo Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable as of December 31, 2016. The Company has recognized interest expense of $30,100 and $37,908 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company made principal reduction payments under the Hallo Note of $13,750 and $57,500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, $218,750 and $232,500, respectively was due under the Hallo Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable.

 

On January 5, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $500,000 (the “January 2015 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. The initial interest rate was 15.0% per year with an initial maturity date of July 5, 2015, that was later extended. In February 2016, following a principal reduction payment of $225,000, the January 2015 Note the maturity date was extended to June 1, 2017, and (ii) interest rate was adjusted to 10.0% per year. In December 2016, following a principal reduction payment of $23,414, the January 2015 Note was amended accordingly (i) the maturity date was changed to “five days following an IPO”, (ii) interest rate was adjusted to 10.0% per year (iii) following a debt or equity financing in excess of $4,000,000 prior to an IPO, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $12,500, (iv) on the maturity date, the Company would make a principal reduction payment of $95,000, and (v) the remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest, after the payments described in (iii) and (iv) above, shall automatically convert to units in connection with the IPO, at a conversion price equal to the average of the highest and the lowest price of the related stock that the Company sold on the maturity date. As a result of such amendment, the January 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable as of December 31, 2016. The Company has recognized interest expense of $18,831 and $24,715 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $256,668 and $251,586, respectively was due under the January 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable.

 

Continued
F-41

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

4. Promissory Notes, continued

 

On April 4, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $450,000 (the “April 2015 Note”). The proceeds from April 2015 Note were used to repay the $450,000 loan outstanding with a bank. The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 5.0% per year during the first twelve months and increases to 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally January 31, 2017. An amendment signed in November 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert into the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the April 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $33,658 and $28,171 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $450,000 was due under the April 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable.

 

On September 18, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $200,000 (the “September 2015 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally January 31, 2017. An amendment signed in November 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the September 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $14,959 and $18,016 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $200,000 was due under the September 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable.

 

Continued
F-42

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

4. Promissory Notes, continued

 

On December 22, 2015, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $353,475 (the “December 2015 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 12.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally September 22, 2016, that was later extended. An amendment signed in December 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the December 2015 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $5,510 and $27,284 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In 2017 and 2016, the Company shipped finished inventory valued at $277,725 and $75,750, respectively, to the lender which agreed that such shipment shall be considered a principal reduction payment. As of December 31, 2016, $277,725 of principal was due under the December 2015 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable. As of September 30, 2017, the December 2015 Note had a zero balance.

 

During February 2016, we entered into five different Loan and Securities Agreements and separate Secured Promissory Notes with a total principal face value of $250,000 (the “Five February 2016 Notes”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowings. Interest accrues at a rate 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date which was originally February 1, 2017, that was later extended. In December 2016, two of the Five February 2016 Notes were terminated and extinguished and the lenders agreed that the $100,000 aggregate principal balance of the loans and the $8,863 aggregate accrued interest would be used to fund their participation in the Series D convertible notes. Three of the Five February 2016 Notes with a principal balance of $150,000 remained outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and are classified as promissory notes at that date. In May 2017, the three remaining holders of the Five February 2016 Notes agreed to amend their notes to include a provision that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the three remaining Five February 2016 Notes were reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $11,219 and $16,123 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, $150,000 was due under to the remaining holders of the Five February 2016 Notes and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable.

 

In connection with the Five February 2016 Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase common units of 1,666,667. The sum of the fair value of the warrants for the promissory notes was recorded as a debt discount to be amortized over the respective terms of the various notes. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $29,000 and $118,000 from the amortization of the debt discount. The BCF was recorded at the date of the amendment to convertible notes payable as a debt discount to be amortized over the respective terms of the various notes.

 

Continued
F-43

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

4. Promissory Notes, continued

 

Promissory Notes:

 

   September 30,    December 31,  
   2017    2016  
         
Five February 2016 Notes          150,000  
Less: Debt discount          (29,417 )
Balance at year end   $    $ 120,583  

  

5. Convertible Notes Payable

 

   Company Proceeds    Carrying Value as of September 30, 2017    Accrued Interest as of September 30, 2017    Principal Value as of Maturity  
Series C Convertible notes payable   $ 2,880,000    $ 25,000    $ 4,412    $ 29,412  
Series D Convertible notes payable     4,716,992      8,039,580      1,286,920      9,458,330  
Series E Convertible notes payable     4,375,000      4,375,000      366,097      5,147,059  
Various individual convertible notes payable     1,575,417      1,575,417      348,512      1,567,086  
Total   $ 13,547,409      14,014,997      2,005,941    $ 16,201,887  
Less: Debt discount          (6,489,625 )           
Less: Beneficial conversion features          (1,657,625 )           
Balance as of September 30, 2017        $ 5,867,747    $ 2,005,941       

  

2016 Activity

 

On February 12, 2016, we entered into a Loan and Securities Agreement and a separate Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $300,000 (the “February 2016 Note”). The personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company serve as the collateral for the borrowing. Interest accrues at a rate 10.0% per year through maturity. All principal and related accrued interest outstanding are due and payable at the maturity date on February 28, 2018, as amended. An amendment signed in November 2016 provided (i) a maturity date of June 1, 2017 and (ii) that if the Company completes an underwritten public offering of its common units or consummates a change of control, then the aggregate outstanding principal and related accrued interest will automatically convert in to the number of common units equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate principal and accrued interest by the conversion price. The conversion price is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the initial public offering or paid by a buyer upon a change in control multiplied by 75%. As a result of such amendment, the February 2016 Note was reclassified to convertible notes payable. The Company has recognized interest expense of $22,438 and $19,068 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $300,000 of principal was due under the February 2016 Note and such amount is classified under convertible notes payable.

 

Continued

F-44 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

5. Convertible Notes Payable, continued

 

In connection with the February 2016 Note, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 common units During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $13,000 and $106,000 from the amortization of the debt discount.

 

On May 11, 2016, a significant unit holder provided a $300,000 unsecured advance to the Company (the “May 2016 Advance”) in contemplation of participating in the Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement dated April 12, 2016, which required the significant unit holder to invest a minimum of $500,000. In July 2016, the significant unit holder invested an additional $200,800 and requested the May 2016 Advance be cancelled and its principal be aggregated with the $200,800 to purchase a total of 1,669,595 preferred units at $0.30 per unit.

 

Series C Convertible Notes Payable

 

During February 2016 through October 2016, the Company received total proceeds of $2,880,000 from the issuance of original issue discount convertible notes (“Series C Convertible Notes”) to investors. The principal balance, plus all accrued and unpaid interest, is due February 28, 2018, as amended, or upon a change of control or an IPO by the Company. The conversion price in effect upon on IPO is the lesser of $0.60 or the price per common unit in the pre-money valuation immediately prior to the IPO multiplied by 80%. The conversion price at any other conversion event is $0.60. Issuance costs to obtain the convertible notes were recorded as a debt discount in the amount of $208,800. The Company has recognized interest expense of $667 and $141,087 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investors and investment bankers to purchase common units of 2,823,529 and 395,296, respectively. The sum of the fair value of the warrants, the BCF and issuance costs for the Series C Convertible Notes were recorded as debt discounts to be amortized to interest expense over the respective term using the effective interest method. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized interest expense of $0 and $178,000 from the amortization of the debt discounts. All of the Series C Convertible Notes, except for $25,000, were extinguished and converted to Series D Convertible Notes between November and December 2016.

 

Series D Convertible Notes Payable

 

On various dates in 2016 and 2017, the Company received total proceeds of $4,716,992 from the issuance of original issue discount convertible notes (“Series D Convertible Notes”) to investors. In addition, the Company: (i) extinguished Series C Convertible Notes in the amount of $2,855,000 along with accrued interest of $172,059 and converted those to Series D Convertible Notes; (ii) extinguished other promissory notes in the amount of $235,704 along with accrued interest of $18,536 and converted those to Series D Convertible Notes; (iii) allowed Mr. Moyer to convert $69,290 of reimbursable expense reports into Series D Convertible Notes; and (iv) allowed Mr. Gadzak to convert $12,000 of certain expenses into Series D Convertible Notes. At the date of issuance, the Series D Convertible Notes had a senior priority security interest in all the personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company except for the January 2015 Note and the Hallo Note which had a pari passu security interest with the Series D Convertible Notes. The principal balance, plus all accrued and unpaid interest is due on February 28, 2018, as amended. The Series D Convertible Notes are eligible for conversion at any point prior to the maturity date or upon a change of control or an IPO by the Company. The conversion price in effect upon on IPO is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the IPO multiplied by 75%. The conversion price at any other conversion event is $0.30. Issuance costs to obtain the convertible notes were recorded as a debt discount in the amount of $386,415. The Company has recognized interest expense of $1,168,254 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

 

Continued

F-45 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

5. Convertible Notes Payable, continued

 

In connection with the Series D Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investors and investment bankers to purchase common units of 15,343,806 and 5,706,731, respectively (see Note 7 for fair value computation). The sum of the fair value of the warrants, the BCF and issuance costs for the Series D Convertible Notes described above were recorded as debt discounts to be amortized to interest expense over the respective term using the effective interest method. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized interest expense of $2,323,452 from the amortization of the debt discounts.

 

Series E Convertible Notes Payable

 

On various dates from May to September 2017, the Company received total proceeds of $4,375,000 from the issuance of original issue discount convertible promissory notes (“Series E Convertible Note”). The Series E Convertible Notes include an original issue discount of 15% and have a senior priority security interest in all the personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company. The principal balance of the Series E Convertible Notes, plus all accrued interest is due on October 31, 2017. The maturity date of the Series E Convertible Notes will be extended to November 30, 2017 if the Company submits a complete filing for a public offering prior to October 31, 2017. The Series E Convertible Notes are eligible for conversion at any point prior to the maturity date or upon a change of control or an IPO by the Company. The conversion price in effect upon on IPO is the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the IPO multiplied by 75%. The conversion price at any other conversion event is the lessor of $0.30 or the price per unit issued by the Company in connection with any sale involving substantially all the assets of the Company. Issuance costs to obtain the convertible notes were recorded as a debt discount in the amount of $246,875. The Company has recognized interest expense of $366,097 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

 

In connection with the Series E Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investors and investment bankers to purchase common units of 17,156,863 and 1,583,910, respectively (see Note 7 for fair value computation). The sum of the fair value of the warrants, the BCF and issuance costs for the Series E Convertible Notes described above were recorded as debt discounts to be amortized to interest expense over the respective term using the effective interest method. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized interest expense of $2,898,810 from the amortization of the debt discounts.

 

Additionally, in connection with the Series E Convertible Note financing, all of the Company’s outstanding promissory and convertible note holders agreed to: (i) subordinate their notes to the Series E Convertible Notes, (ii) release all security interests in the Company’s assets in favor of the Series E Convertible Notes (iii) extend their maturity dates to February 28, 2018 and (iv) amend the Company’s Operating Agreement to allow the Series E Convertible Note lender one seat on the Company’s Board of Directors so long as the investor owns any debt or securities of the Company.

 

Derivative Liability

 

The February 2016 Note, the Series C Convertible Notes, the Series D Convertible Notes and the Series E Convertible Notes contain an embedded conversion feature that the Company has determined is a derivative requiring bifurcation. The fair value of the derivative liability was $4,183,000 which was recorded as derivative liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the convertible notes payable. (See Note 6 for fair value computation.) Prior to September 30, 2017, the Company has determined that the embedded conversion feature had de minimus value as the Company was not actively seeking any type of offering or change of control at that time due to the financial condition of the Company.

 

Continued

F-46 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

6. Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company measures the fair value of financial instruments using a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Each level of input has different levels of subjectivity and difficulty involved in determining fair value.

 

Level 1 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Therefore, determining fair value for Level 1 investments generally does not require significant judgment, and the estimation is not difficult.

 

Level 2 – Pricing is provided by third-party sources of market information obtained through investment advisors. The Company does not adjust for or apply any additional assumptions or estimates to the pricing information received from its advisors.

 

Level 3 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions. The determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments involves the most management judgment and subjectivity.

 

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 by level within the fair value hierarchy, are as follows:

 

   September 30, 2017  
   Quoted prices in active markets    Significant other observable inputs    Significant unobservable inputs  
   (Level 1)    (Level 2)    (Level 3)  
Liabilities:                
Warrant liability   $    $    $ 1,748,716  
Derivative liability   $    $    $ 4,183,000  

 

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

 

   December 31, 2016  
   Quoted prices in active markets    Significant other observable inputs    Significant unobservable inputs  
   (Level 1)    (Level 2)    (Level 3)  
Liabilities:                
Warrant liability   $    $    $ 1,619,287  

 

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Continued

F-47 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

6. Fair Value Measurements, continued

 

Warrant Liability

 

The following table includes a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s warrant liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

 

   Warrant Liability  
   For the nine months ended  
   September 30, 2017  
Beginning balance   $ 1,619,287  
Additions     3,332,897  
Change in fair value     (3,203,468 )
Ending balance   $ 1,748,716  

 

The changes in fair value of the warrant liability are recorded in change in fair value of warrant liability in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

A summary of the weighted average significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) used in measuring the Company’s warrant liability that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2017 is as follows:

 

   As of
September 30, 2017
 
Common Unit Price   $ 0.16  
Term (Years)     4.43  
Volatility     57 %
Risk-free rate of interest     1.85 %
Dividend Yield     0.0 %

 

Derivative Liability

 

The following table includes a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s derivative liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:

 

   Derivative Liability  
   For the nine months ended  
   September 30, 2017  
Beginning balance   $  
Additions     4,183,000  
Change in fair value     
Ending balance   $ 4,183,000  

 

Continued

F-48 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

6. Fair Value Measurements, continued

 

As of September 30, 2017, the Company measured the fair value of the derivative by estimating the fair value of the convertible notes payable at certain conversion points. To calculate the fair value of the convertible notes payable with the conversion feature, the Company calculated the present value of the convertible notes payable upon conversion at a qualifying initial public offering in the first quarter of 2018, and the present value of the convertible notes payable at non-qualifying initial public offering in the last quarter of 2018. The Company estimated a probability of 50% for the occurrence of a qualifying initial public offering in the first quarter of 2018 and a probability of 50% in the last quarter of 2018.

 

The Company’s derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using the Probability Weighted Expected Return valuation methodology. A summary of the weighted average significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) used in measuring the Company’s embedded conversion options that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2017 is as follows:

 

   As of
September 30, 2017
 
Common Unit Price   $ 0.24  
Term (Years)     1.00  
Volatility     52 %
Risk-free rate of interest     1.31 %
Dividend Yield     0.0 %

 

7. Members’ Deficit

 

The Members have organized a Delaware limited liability company and adopted a Limited Liability Company Agreement on July 27, 2010, as amended and restated on July 13, 2011, December 18, 2014 and April 9, 2016. The units are classified into common and preferred units, and a member is entitled to the right to one vote for each unit held. Subject to the terms of the Company’s Carve-Out Plan, the Carve-Out Plan participants are entitled to receive any distribution payable prior to any liquidation payments to the members. (See Note 8.) The holders of preferred units are entitled to a liquidation preference prior to any distributions to holders of common units of $0.30 per unit, respectively, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends, if any. If the amounts available for distribution are insufficient to permit the payments to the members holding preferred units, then the available distributions will be made on a pro rata basis among the holders of the preferred units. Distribution of any remaining assets or proceeds upon liquidation will be made to the holders of common units in an amount equal to the aggregate purchase price paid for the units and for convertible securities divided by the aggregate purchase price paid by all holders for common and preferred units and convertible securities. If the amounts available for distribution are insufficient to permit the payments to the members holding common units, then the available distributions will be made on a pro rata basis among the holders of the common units. All profits and losses of the Company are allocated to the members based on their ownership percentages.

 

Continued

F-49 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

7. Members’ Deficit, continued

 

Preferred Units

 

At various dates between April 2016 and July 2016, the Company entered into purchase agreements with investors for the sale of 5,381,572 preferred units at $0.30 per unit, resulting in gross cash proceeds of $1,614,471 and net cash proceeds of $1,501,058, after payment of underwriting costs of $113,413. In addition, preferred units of 1,290,000 were purchased with non-cash contributions resulting from the conversion of a $300,000 promissory note and the conversion of reimbursable employee expenses of $87,000. To participate in this financing transaction, common unit holders were required to contribute the lesser of (i) 14 percent of their total prior investments or (ii) $500,000. If that criterion were met, then all common units held by that investor would automatically convert to an equal number of preferred units. In connection with this financing 34,767,246 common units were converted to preferred units.

 

Common Units

 

During January, February and April 2016, we entered into purchase agreements with investors for the sale of 800,000 common units at $0.30 per unit, resulting in gross cash proceeds of $240,000 and net cash proceeds of $219,750, after payment of underwriting costs of $20,250.

 

Warrants for Common Units

 

The Company has issued warrants to purchase common units to employees as compensation for services rendered, as well as, in conjunction with the purchase of common units in equity and debt transactions. A summary of the warrant activity and related information that occurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and as of September 30, 2017 is provided in the following paragraphs.

 

In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,823,529 common units at an exercise price of $0.69 per unit with a five-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $746,902 which was recorded as warrant liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the Series C Convertible Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 55%, risk-free interest rate 1.18% and expected life of 5 years. In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the remaining fair value of the warrants of $183,078 was converted into Series D Convertible Notes warrants.

 

In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants to investment bankers to purchase 395,296 common units at an exercise price of $0.69 per unit with a five-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $100,405 which was recorded as warrant liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the Series C Convertible Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 53%, risk-free interest rate 1.10% and expected life of 5 years. In connection with the Series C Convertible Notes, the remaining fair value of the warrants of $100,405 was converted into Series D Convertible Notes.

 

Continued

F-50 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

7. Members’ Deficit, continued

 

As of September 30, 2017, in connection with the Series D Convertible Notes, the Company has issued, during 2016 and 2017, warrants to purchase 15,343,806 common units at an exercise price of $0.36 per unit with a five-year term. For the warrants issued in 2017, the fair value of $831,039 was recorded as warrant liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the Series D Convertible Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price on the dates of grant $0.30, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 56%, risk-free interest rate 1.90% and expected life of 5 years. The fair value of all of the warrants, including those issued in 2016 and in 2017, was remeasured during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and was $623,000 as of September 30, 2017. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions upon remeasurement at September 30, 2017: common unit price of $0.16, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 57%, risk-free interest rate 1.83% and expected remaining life of 4.3 years.

 

As of September 30, 2017, in connection with the Series E Convertible Notes, the Company has issued warrants to purchase 17,156,863 common units at an exercise price of $0.30 per unit with a five-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $2,228,726 which was recorded as warrant liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the Series E Convertible Notes. The fair value of the warrants at the dates of issuance was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price of $0.30, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 57%, risk-free interest rate 1.81% and expected life of 5.0 years. The fair value of all of the warrants was remeasured during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and was $857,843 as of September 30, 2017. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions upon remeasurement at September 30, 2017: common unit price of $0.16, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 56%, risk-free interest rate 1.92% and expected remaining life of 4.7 years.

 

In connection with the Series D and Series E Convertible Notes, the Company issued warrants during 2016 and 2017 to investment bankers to purchase 4,116,128 common units at an exercise price of $0.36 per unit with a five-year term. For the warrants issued in 2017, the fair value of $273,132 was recorded as warrant liability with the offset recorded as a discount to the Series D and E Convertible Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model on the dates of grant based on the following weighted average assumptions: common unit price of $0.30, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 56%, risk-free interest rate 1.91% and expected life of 5 years. The fair value of the warrants was remeasured during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and as of September 30, 2017 is $267,662. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following weighted average assumptions upon remeasurement at September 30, 2017: common unit price of $0.16, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 58%, risk-free interest rate 1.79% and expected remaining life of 4.3 years.

 

In connection with the Series C, Series D and Series E Convertible Notes, the Company recognized the fair value of the warrants as a liability, as the warrant agreements included a price protection provision adjusting the exercise price of the warrant in the event the Company issued units (i) at a price per share less than the exercise price then in effect or (ii) without consideration.

 

In connection with the February 2016 Note, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 common units at an exercise price $0.36 per unit with a three-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $159,000 which was recorded as a component of members’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the February 2016 Note. The fair value of the warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 53%, risk-free interest rate 0.89% and expected life of 3 years.

 

Continued

F-51 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

7. Members’ Deficit, continued

 

In connection with the Five February 2016 Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,666,670 common units at an exercise price $0.30 per unit with a three-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $588,335 which was recorded as a component of members’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the Five February 2016 Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 53%, risk-free interest rate 0.91% and expected life of 3 years.

 

In connection with the Moyer 2016 Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 226,175 common units at an exercise price $0.36 per unit with a three-year term. The fair value of the warrants was $71,638 which was recorded as a component of members’ deficit with the offset recorded as a discount to the Moyer 2016 Notes. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on the following assumptions: common unit price on date of grant $0.60, expected dividend yield 0%, expected volatility 52%, risk-free interest rate 0.94% and expected life of 3 years.

 

Exercise    Warrants    Remaining    Warrants  
Price    Outstanding    Life (years)    Exercisable  
              
$ 0.30      20,385,722      4.61      18,823,533  
$ 0.36      22,534,311      4.29      22,534,311  
$ 0.69      24,510      3.54      24,510  
$ 0.33      42,944,543      4.44      41,382,354  

 

Warrants exercisable above, excludes 1,562,189 warrants that have been granted to employees that are outstanding but only become exercisable upon a change of control of the Company (see Note 11).

 

8. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases

 

The Company rents its office under an operating lease, which expires in October 2018. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is responsible for taxes, insurance and maintenance expense. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period. Rent expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $251,000 and $246,000, respectively.

 

Future annual minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable operating lease as of September 30, 2017 are $83,394 for the year ending December 31, 2017 and $266,000 for the year ending December 31, 2018.

 

Continued

F-52 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

8. Commitments and Contingencies, continued

 

Other Commitments

 

Employees, consultants, and directors of the Company are entitled to participate in the Company’s Carve-Out Plan (the “Plan”) at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. Each Plan participant is awarded points which entitle the participant to a portion of the proceeds payable to the Company and/or its members upon a sale of the Company. The proceeds payable to a Plan participant shall equal an amount determined in accordance with the following formula: (number of points held by participant /total points outstanding)*18% of Net Sale Price. For this purpose, “Net Sale Price” equals the aggregate amount payable to the Company and/or its members in connection with a sale of the Company less all amounts payable to creditors of the Company. Awards payable to Plan participants are senior to any amounts payable to members of the Company. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has not recorded a liability relating to this Plan. Any amounts payable under the Plan will be recognized as compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations during the period the Company becomes obligated to make such payments. (See Note 11).

 

Contingencies

 

In the normal course of business, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of a possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred.

 

The Company’s management does not believe that any such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 
 

9. Assumption of WiSA, LLC

 

On April 25, 2014, the Company assumed 100% of Silicon Image, Inc.’s (“SIMG”) interest in WiSA LLC, a Delaware corporation (“WiSA”). WiSA (“Wireless Speaker and Audio Association”) is a trade association jointly established by the Company and SIMG in July 2011, for the promotion of the Company’s proprietary technology for the wireless transmission and reception of audio from a source device. SIMG had been responsible for acting as an agent of WiSA and managing the day-to-day affairs of WiSA including the development of its trademarks and marketing plans.

 

SIMG assigned its ownership in WiSA to the Company at no cost and gave the Company a three year license to use the WiSA trademarks for $100. In addition, at the Company’s sole discretion, the Company had the option to purchase the WiSA trademarks for $2,000,000 at the earlier of (i) April 25, 2017 or (ii) the closing date of a “Change in Ownership” as defined in the Company’s July 13, 2011 Operating Agreement. On May 17, 2017, the Company and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (“Lattice”), the acquirer of SIMG agreed to amend the license and transfer agreement between Summit Semiconductor and Silicon Image dated March 26, 2014 (WiSA Transfer Agreement). Under the terms of the amendment, the Company’s license of the WiSA trademarks were extended to September 15, 2017 upon a payment of $25,000 to Lattice which the Company completed on May 19, 2017 (see Note 11).

 

Continued

F-53 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

9. Assumption of WiSA, LLC, continued

 

No assets or liabilities were booked in connection with the Company’s assumption of SIMG’s interest in WiSA as the Company was already a party to the marketing plans and only received a license to the trademarks which were determined to have no incremental value.

 

10. Related Parties

 

Brett Moyer

 

Mr. Moyer has served as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and a board member since the Company’s founding in August 2010. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Mr. Moyer was owed $269,091 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 2.5% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

Michael Fazio

 

Mr. Michael Fazio is the Chairman of MARCorp Financial LLC a private equity firm located in Illinois. Mr. Fazio has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since May 2017. MARCorp Signal LLC, a wholly owned entity of MARCorp Financial LLC, is the sole holder of the Company’s Series E Convertible Notes.

 

Jonathan Gazdak

 

Mr. Gazdak, works as Managing Director – Head of Investment Banking for Alexander Capital an investment banking firm based in New York. Mr. Gazdak has been a member of the Company’s board of directors since June 2015. Alexander Capital has acted as the lead investment bank in a number of the Company’s private financings. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Mr. Gazdak owned 0.7% of the outstanding units of the Company. As of September 30, 2017, Mr. Gazdak was owed $14,118 of principal under convertible promissory notes.

 

The Company has signed an engagement letter with Alexander Capital under which Alexander Capital earns a fee on total investments by their clients. Alexander Capital earned fees of $248,175 and $223,663 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 Alexander Capital had been issued 4,494,106 common unit warrants that are exercisable at $0.36 per unit and have a five year life.

 

Helge Kristensen

 

Mr. Kristensen has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors since 2010. Mr. Kristensen is a managing member of Inizio Capital, an investment company based in China and Hansong Technology LTD, an original device manufacture of audio products based in China. As of December 31, 2016, affiliates of Mr. Kristensen were owed $327,725 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 3.8% of the Company’s outstanding units. As of September 30, 2017, affiliates of Mr. Kristensen were owed $0 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 3.8% of the Company’s outstanding units.

 

Continued

F-54 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

10. Related Parties, continued

 

Significant Unitholders

 

As of September 30, 2017, the significant unitholder was owed $1,302,941 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 36.8% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

Another significant unitholder is a client of Alexander Capital who began investing in the Company in 2015. As of September 30, 2017, this significant unitholder was owed $1,011,764 of principal under convertible promissory notes and owned 25.1% of the outstanding units of the Company.

 

11. Subsequent Events

 

Financing

 

On October 17, 2017, the Company received additional gross proceeds of $625,000 under the Series E Convertible Note, thereby making the total outstanding under the Series E Convertible Notes $5,882,353. On October 31, 2017, the Company filed a confidential S-1 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“S-1”) with the belief that the S-1 filing would extend the maturity date of the Series E Convertible Notes to November 30, 2017. The Series E Convertible Note holders claimed that the S-1 filing did not meet the definition outlined in the Series E Convertible Note and issued a notice of default to the Company on November 2, 2017 (“Default Notice”).

 

On November 30, 2017, as a result of the Default Notice and an inability of the two parties to renegotiate the Series E Convertible Notes under acceptable terms, the Company requested and received a Series E Convertible Note payoff letter (“Series E Payoff Letter”) from the Series E Convertible Note holders. The Series E Payoff Letter stated that in addition to the repayment of the Series E Convertible Notes of $5,882,353, that the Series E Convertible Note holders were due, $1,097,695 of default interest and penalties, reimbursement of $178,645 of legal fees, and consulting, travel and lodging fees of $102,063. Despite the Company’s vigorous disagreement that it was in default and subject to default penalties, interest and legal fees, the Company paid the full monetary demand of $7,260,756 as requested by the Series E Convertible Note holders on November 30, 2017.

 

On November 30, 2017, in connection with a provision in the Series E Convertible Note warrants (Series E Warrants), the outstanding Series E Warrants doubled, as the Company had not completed an IPO by November 30, 2017. Therefore, total warrants outstanding under the Series E Convertible Notes are 39,215,686.

 

Continued

F-55 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

11. Subsequent Events, continued

 

Financing, continued

 

On November 30, 2017, the Company entered into a security purchase agreement under which the Company may issue up to $13,000,000 of convertible promissory notes (“Series F Convertible Note”). Between November 30, 2017 and January 30, 2018 the Company received gross proceeds of $9,852,500 and issued Series F Convertible Notes of $9,852,500. The Series F Convertible Notes accrue interest at 15% per year and have a senior priority security interest in all the personal property, fixtures and intellectual property and products of the Company. The principal balance of the Series F Convertible Notes, plus all accrued interest is due on June 30, 2018. The Series F Convertible Notes are eligible for conversion at any point prior to the maturity date at the option of the holder. The conversion price in effect upon on IPO shall be the lesser of $0.30 or the highest price per common unit sold in the IPO multiplied by 60%. The conversion price at any other conversion event shall be $0.30.

 

In connection with the issuance of the $9,852,500 of Series F Convertible Notes, the Company issued 16,420,833 warrants to the lender and 3,284,168 warrants to investment bankers. The warrants have a five year life and are exercisable into common units at $0.36 per unit.

 

WiSA LLC

 

On October 16, 2017, in connection with a second amendment to the WiSA Transfer Agreement, the Company paid Lattice $125,000 and Lattice: (i) assigned its entire equity interest in the Company, consisting of 250,000 common units to the Company, which were retired, and (ii) assigned the WiSA trademarks to the Company.

 

Amendment to Employee Warrants

 

As described in Note 7, warrants granted to employees in 2016 were only exercisable in connection with a change of control as the result of a sale or merger of the Company. In October 2017, the Company’s board of directors approved an amendment to modify the definition of a change in control to include sale, merger or the effective date of a registration statement duly filed by the Company with the SEC in accordance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

Conversion from LLC to C Corporation

 

On December 31, 2017, the Company converted from a Delaware Limited Liability Company to a Delaware C Corporation (the “Conversion”). Prior to the Conversion, the Company had been taxed as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, such that the Company’s taxable income is reported by its members in their respective tax returns. Following the Conversion, the Company will now be taxed as a corporation. In connection with the Conversion, the Company authorized 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 200,000,000 shares of common stock and issued 324,821 shares of common stock to such investors previously holding 4,872,221 common membership interests and 2,762,594 shares of preferred stock to such investors previously holding 41,438,818 preferred membership interests. Such shares of common stock and preferred stock were fully paid, nonassessable shares of stock of the Company. A pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 has been included to show the effect of the Conversion. In addition, pro form net loss per share has been included on the statements of operations to show the effects of the Conversion on net loss per common share.

 

Continued

F-56

 

 

Summit Semiconductor, LLC.

 

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Cancellation of Carve-Out Plan and Approval of Long-Term Incentive Plan

  

On January 30, 2018, the Company terminated the Carve-Out Plan (the “Plan”) described in Note 8, Other Commitments and, subject to stockholder ratification and approval, issued to its employees and directors 1,284,470 and 153,126, respectively, shares of restricted common stock. Such shares of restricted common stock are fully vested, and will be released to the employees and directors in three tranches at the rate of 34%, 33% and 33% on September 1, 2018, March 1, 2019 and September 1, 2019, respectively. In the event an employee voluntarily resigns, the release dates of the shares will be extend such that only 16.5% of the shares are released every six months, until 100% are released. In the event a director voluntarily resigns, each of the release dates will be extended six months. 

 

On January 30, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the establishment of the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), which is intended to replace the Plan. The LTIP was effective upon adoption by the Board, subject to approval within twelve (12) months by the stockholders of the Company.

 

 F-57

 

                          Shares

 

Summit Semiconductor, Inc.

Common Stock 

 

Prospectus 

 

Alexander Capital, L.P.

  

Through and including,                       , 2018 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that effect transactions in shares of our common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions. 

 

 

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

 

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than the underwriting discounts and commissions, payable in connection with the sale and distribution of the securities being registered. All amounts are estimated except the SEC registration fee, the FINRA filing fee and The Nasdaq Stock Market listing fee. Except as otherwise noted, all the expenses below will be paid by us.

 

SEC registration fee   $    
FINRA filing fee        
Nasdaq initial listing fee        
Legal fees and expenses        
Accounting fees and expenses        
Printing and engraving expenses        
Transfer agent and registrar fees and expenses        
Blue sky fees and expenses        
Miscellaneous fees and expenses        
Total   $    

  

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

 

Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL allows a corporation to provide in its certificate of incorporation that a director of the corporation will not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except where the director breached the duty of loyalty, failed to act in good faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized the payment of a dividend or approved a stock repurchase in violation of Delaware corporate law or obtained an improper personal benefit. Our certificate of incorporation provides for this limitation of liability. 

 

Section 145 of the DGCL, or Section 145, provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was, is or is threatened to be made, party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of such corporation), by reason of the fact that such person is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of such corporation or is or was serving at the request of such corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was illegal. A Delaware corporation may indemnify any persons who are, were or are a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit, provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, provided that no indemnification is permitted without judicial approval if the officer, director, employee or agent is adjudged to be liable to the corporation. Where an officer or director is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action referred to above, the corporation must indemnify him against the expenses which such officer or director has actually and reasonably incurred. 

 

Section 145 further authorizes a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation would otherwise have the power to indemnify him under Section 145. 

 

II-1

 

Our bylaws provide that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL and must also pay expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition upon delivery of an undertaking, by or on behalf of an indemnified person, to repay all amounts so advanced if it should be determined ultimately that such person is not entitled to be indemnified. 

 

We have entered into indemnification agreements with certain of our executive officers and directors pursuant to which have agreed to indemnify such persons against all expenses and liabilities incurred or paid by such person in connection with any proceeding arising from the fact that such person is or was an officer or director of our company, and to advance expenses as incurred by or on behalf of such person in connection therewith. 

 

The indemnification rights set forth above shall not be exclusive of any other right which an indemnified person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, provision of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. 

 

We maintain standard policies of insurance that provide coverage (1) to our directors and officers against loss rising from claims made by reason of breach of duty or other wrongful act and (2) to us with respect to indemnification payments that we may make to such directors and officers.

 

The proposed form of Underwriting Agreement to be filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement will provide for indemnification of our directors and officers by the placement agent party thereto against certain liabilities. See “Item 17. Undertakings” for a description of the SEC’s position regarding such indemnification provisions.

 

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

In January 2015, we entered into a 15% Secured Promissory Note with the principal face value of $500,000 (January 2015 Note), with an accredited investor. As there was no placement agent or other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $500,000.

 

Between February 2015 and July 2015, we completed “best efforts” private offerings (Series B Convertible Notes) with a group of accredited investors for the sale of 12% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, as amended, in the aggregate principal amount of $2,837,800, for total net proceeds to us of $2,779,300, after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. Such notes were subsequently converted into 988,889 shares of common stock and 11,433,911 shares of preferred stock.

 

In April 2015, we entered into a 5% Secured Promissory Note (April 2015 Note), with the principal face value of $450,000 with Carl E. Berg, a significant unitholder and an accredited investor. As there was no placement agent or other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $450,000.

 

Between April 2015 and April 2016, we completed “best efforts” private offerings (Series B-1) with a group of accredited investors for the sale of an aggregate of 17,466,667 shares of common stock for total gross proceeds to us of $5,240,000 and total net proceeds of $4,774,250, after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. Subsequently, 14,383,333 of those shares were converted into shares of preferred stock.

 

In September 2015, we entered into a 10% Secured Promissory Note (September 2015 Note), with the principal face value of $200,000 with Mr. Berg. As there was no placement agent or other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $200,000.

 

In December 2015, we entered into a 12% Secured Promissory Note (December 2015 Note), with the principal face value of $353,475, with Hansong Technology, an affiliate of Helge Kristensen, a member of the Company’s board of directors. As there was no placement agent or other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $353,475.

 

In February 2016, we entered into 10% Secured Promissory Note (Five February 2016 Notes) with the principal face value of $500,000 with five accredited investors including, Brett Moyer, CEO of the Company, and Inizio Capital, an affiliate of Mr. Kristensen. As there was no placement agent or other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $500,000. In addition, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,666,667 common units at an exercise price of $0.30 per unit.

 

In February 2016, we entered into 10% Secured Promissory Note (February 2016 Note) with the principal face value of $300,000 with Mr. Berg, a significant shareholder and accredited investor. As there was no placement agent or other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $300,000. In addition, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 common units at an exercise price of $0.36 per unit.

 

In May 2016, Mr. Berg provided a $300,000 unsecured advance to the Company (May 2016 Advance). The May 2016 Advance was ultimately cancelled and used to purchase preferred units under the Series B-2 offering described below.

 

Between February 2016 and June 2016, we entered into three separate 10% Secured Promissory Notes (Moyer 2016 Notes) with a total principal face value of $135,704 with Mr. Moyer. As there was no placement agent or other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $135,704. In addition, the Company issued warrants to purchase 226,175 common units at an exercise price of $0.36 per unit.

 

Between February 2016 and October 2016, we completed a “best efforts” private offering (Series C Convertible Notes) with a group of accredited investors for the sale of 15% Original Issue Discount (“OID”) Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, as amended, in the aggregate principal amount of $2,880,000 and warrants to purchase common stock for total net proceeds to us of $2,671,200, after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. Such notes are convertible into shares of common stock at $0.60. The warrants are exercisable at $0.69 per share for an aggregate of 2,823,529 shares of common stock. Between November 2016 and December 2016, $2,855,000 of Series C Convertible Notes along with accrued interest of $172,059 was converted to Series D Convertible Notes. In addition,

 

Between April 2016 and July 2016, we completed “best efforts” private offerings (Series B-2) with a group of accredited investors for the sale of 5,381,572 shares of preferred stock for total gross proceeds to us of $1,614,471 and net proceeds of $1,501,058, after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. In addition, preferred units of 1,290,000 were purchased with non-cash contributions resulting from the conversion of a $300,000 promissory note and the conversion of reimbursable employee expenses of $87,000. 

 

II-2

 

Between November 2016 and July 2017, we completed “best efforts” private offerings (Series D Convertible Notes) with a group of accredited investors for the sale of 15% OID Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, as amended, in the aggregate principal amount of $4,716,992 and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for total net proceeds to us of $4,330,577, after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. In addition, $3,362,588 of other promissory notes, Series C Convertible Notes and related accrued interest were converted to Series D Convertible Notes. Such notes are convertible into shares of common stock at $0.30. The warrants are exercisable at $0.36 per share, for an aggregate of 15,343,806 shares of common stock.

 

Between May 2017 and October 2017, we completed “best efforts” private offerings (Series E Convertible Notes) with MARCorp Signal, LLC, an accredited investor, for the sale of 15% OID Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, as amended, in the aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000 and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for total net proceeds to us of $4,725,000, after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. Such notes are convertible into shares of common stock at $0.30. The warrants are exercisable at $0.30 per share, for an aggregate of 19,607,843 shares of common stock.

 

Between November 2017 and December 2017, we completed “best efforts” private offerings (Series F Convertible Notes) with a group of accredited investors for the sale 15% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, as amended, in the aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000 and warrants to purchase shares of common stock for total net proceeds to us of $8,190,000 after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. Those notes are convertible into shares of common stock at $0.30. The warrants are exercisable at $0.36 per shares for an aggregate of 15,000,000 shares of common stock.

 

The sale and the issuance of the foregoing notes and warrants were offered and sold in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act (“Regulation D”). We made this determination based on the representations of each investor which included, in pertinent part, that each such investor was either (a) an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D or (b) a “qualified institutional buyer” within the meaning of Rule 144A under the Securities Act and upon such further representations from each investor that (i) such investor acquired the securities for his, her or its own account for investment and not for the account of any other person and not with a view to or for distribution, assignment or resale in connection with any distribution within the meaning of the Securities Act, (ii) such investor agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the purchased shares unless they are registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws, or an exemption or exemptions from such registration are available, (iii) such investor had knowledge and experience in financial and business matters such that he, she or it was capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in us, (iv) such investor had access to all of our documents, records, and books pertaining to the investment and was provided the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers regarding the terms and conditions of the offering and to obtain any additional information which we possessed or were able to acquire without unreasonable effort and expense, and (v) such investor had no need for the liquidity in its investment in us and could afford the complete loss of such investment. In addition, there was no general solicitation or advertising for securities issued in reliance upon these exemptions.

 

II-3

 

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

  (a) Exhibits.

 

Exhibit No.   Description of Exhibit
1.1 #   Form of Underwriting Agreement.
     
3.1(i) #   Certificate of Incorporation of Summit Semiconductor, Inc., as currently in effect.
     
3.2(i) #   Bylaws of Summit Semiconductor, Inc., as currently in effect.
     
3.3(ii) #   Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Summit Semiconductor, Inc., to be effective upon the completion of this offering.
     
4.1 #   Form of Common Stock Certificate.
     
4.2 #   Form of Representatives’ Warrant to be issued upon completion of this offering
     
5.1 #   Form of Opinion of Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C.
     
10.1 #   Summit Semiconductor, Inc., Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan.
     
10.2 #   Forms of Restricted Stock Agreement and Grant Notice under the Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan.
     
10.3 #   Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Summit Semiconductor, Inc., and each of its directors and executive officers.
     
10.4 #   Lease Agreement between ____________ and Summit Semiconductor, Inc., dated ____________.
     
10.5 #   Securities Purchase Agreement between MARCorp Signal, LLC and Summit Semiconductor, LLC, dated May 17, 2017.
     
21.1#   List of subsidiaries
     
23.1 #   Consent of BPM LLP
     
23.2 #   Consent of Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C. (included in Exhibit 5.1).
     
24.1*   Power of Attorney (see page II-7 to this registration statement).

 

* Filed herewith
# To be filed by amendment.

 

  (b) Financial statement schedules.

 

No financial statement schedules are provided because the information called for is not required or is shown in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

 

II-4

 

Item 17. Undertakings

 

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the Underwriting Agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:

 

(1)  For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.

 

(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser

 

II-5

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, we have duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Jose, State of California, on the ___ day of ______________, 2018. 

 

  SUMMIT SEMICONDUCTOR , INC.
     
  By:  
    Brett Moyer
    President and Chief Executive Officer

 

II-6

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY 

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose individual signature appears below hereby authorizes and appoints Brett Moyer and Gary Williams, and each of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution and full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act in his name, place and stead and to execute in the name and on behalf of each person, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file any and all amendments to this Registration Statement on Form S-1, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

         
Signature    Title    Date 
         
    President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Board (principal executive officer)   , 2018
Brett Moyer       
         
    Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)    2018
 Gary Williams       
         
    Director   , 2018
Michael Fazio         
         
    Director   2018
 Jonathan Gazdak         
         
    Director   2018
Jeffrey M. Gilbert         
         
    Director   2018
Helge Kristensen        
     
    Director   2018
Sam Runco         

  

II-7